TINY
BITS
So, let us
explore the ramifications of this Statistical Energy Density as a foundational
building block of our model with the following thought experiments. If a single star were hypothetically alone in all the cosmos, its castoff energy and particles that make up its “solar wind” might continue to dissipate into ever less dense concentrations to a point of nearly unconceivable emptiness.
For simplicity,
though, let us set up a mental experiment where we will onlyconsider the
solar winds of one pair of two closely neighbored stars as an isolated
system with no other consideration to any other stars. For any two
such stars, regardless of any amount of difference in their sizes or energy
outputs, there will be some point, along an imaginary “line”
connecting the two stars, where the forces of their opposing solar winds
will meet at a “point” of statistically averaged opposing
equilibrium of individual particles and/or energy forces. In fact, a plane
of opposing equilibrium would manifest as well, albeit that this “plane”
might be a curved surface, if the stars were significantly different in
size or energy output. The plane would be statistically perpendicular
to the imaginary “line” connecting the two stars and intersecting
the line at the point of solar wind equilibrium. That specific
“point” in the statistical geometry of their solar winds,
would experience a phenomenon very much akin to the way gravity acts,
with opposing forces pushing equally toward a central location. In three
dimensional space this “point” would take on the shape of
a sphere at the center of a disk that is, itself, statistically perpendicular
to the “connecting line” between the two stars. Probability
enters the Model, here. At this central location, where the two opposing
solar winds meet with equal opposing averaged forces, some of the particles/energies
must begin to collide and scatter debris or simply be deflected from their
nearly perfectly opposing directions. This is reasonable to predict, because
of the experimental results witnessed in Atom smashers, and if light can
interfere with light to create interference patterns, then even light
energies can interact with each other in a scattering manner. Then, with
each such collision the probability of secondary collisions should increase
due to more favorable angles of exposure, causing a cascading effect of
accelerating centralized collisions/ interactions (in the number of occurrences
per volumetric space). The end effect of which is: that a region of increasing
energy/mass density will begin to form around a central “point”
between the two stars. This increased energy/mass density could in practicality
begin to manifest over an extended range all along the “connecting”
line between the two stars. Over time, with each collision, this configuration
would naturally push debris ever closer to the statistical midpoint.
Then as the increasing density along the connecting line makes collisions
ever more certain, a threshold could be reached where a virtual impenetrable
barrier begins to form at the statistical midpoint between the two stars. Once this barrier
stage has been reached, a state of true Gravity will have been created,
or more correctly, fully materializedwhere there is an effective equal
force pushing into a central growing mass from all directions. But, in
this model, the Gavitic geometry exists as a first principle prior to
the accumulation of any mass, and the mass develops only as a result of
equally opposing energies acting in a structured cosmic geometry. This
model would utilize all the same Newtonian and Relativistic mathematics
to accurately describe the ratio relationships between massive bodies,
but with a new way of envisioning the underlining mechanism. If this basic
hypothetical example demonstrates a reasonable possibility for the mechanism
of Gravity, then it is a fairly simple progressive process to expand the
model to reflect the true complexity of the universal structure of matter
and energy and forces. Let us briefly
deal with the application of this model with the consideration of moving
stars. Using the same thought experiment as aboveonly this time with
two stars that are moving relative to each other, we find that there is
still a
“moving point” that would track as the statistical midpoint
between the two stars, for any time t or change in time Dt, relative to
the statistical mean time between the two stars. Then, depending on their
proximity and their approaching or departing velocities, there may or
may not be a sufficient build up of energy density to initiate the accelerating
collision condition necessary to “materialize” a stable gravity
area or “field.” Even so, at all but departing velocities
approaching the speed of light, we would predict some degree of Gaviticlike
field to manifest at the moving statistical midpoint for all configurations
of two moving stars. This moving star midpoint example should expand
to work for any number of stars with their various simple and more complex
combined moving midpoints, as well. Now, let us
next consider some hypothetical multiple star configurations. If we were
to add more stars to our thought experiment, then every possible pairing
of two stars would form similar equilibrium midpoint centers and equilibrium
disk planes around the equilibrium midpoints, with each plane being perpendicular
to the “connecting lines” between each and every pairing of
two stars. Then, as these
various planes extend to cross other planes, they would naturally, geometrically,
form equilibrium “lines” of compounded mass/energy density
equilibriums at the junctions where any plane crosses or intersects another
plane. With moving stars, these crossingplane “lines” would,
a priori, curve with time to reflect the relative movements of the particular
stars involved in making the equilibrium points/planes, ultimately leading
to the creation of orbits. As these equilibrium
plane junction lines meet or intersect other equilibrium junction lines,
additional “points” of even greater equilibrium complexity
will occur. By now, a pattern
of chemical elements, with their integer progression, begins to makes
sense as a natural result of nothing more than cosmic geometry with certain
configurations having naturally more stability, as with the Noble gases. So, what happens
when we expand the situation to reflect the actual observable sky, full
of stars? To begin to
illustrate this, let us now try a more specific and somewhat more realistic
configuration as a thought experiment. Let us imagine
a single star at one end of a vast expanse of space, and progressively
add ever more stars, but only at the opposite end of this vast expanse
of space in a manner that the additional stars are in relatively closer
proximity to each other than they are to the single isolated star at the
distant “opposite” end of the expanse. Now, with each
additional star we add in the manner imagined above, the statistical equilibrium
“midpoint” of mass/energy density moves, by averaging, closer
and closer to the single isolated star. After trillions and trillions
of stars are assembled at the “end” opposite the single isolated
star, the resulting statistical equilibrium midpoint has moved relatively
very close to the single isolated star to a “focal” center
on a predictably curved or tear drop shaped “plane” enclosure
forming around the single isolated star. The overall
average direction of particle/energy actions at this “focal”
equilibrium “point“, near the isolated star, should now be
approaching the real function and action of planetary gravity, with vast
numbers of quantum bits pushing (heading) in toward this central focus
point. In fact, the opposing “wall” of resistance to the single
isolated star’s solar wind at this “focus” point/plane/orbit
would be well on its way to becoming massive, literally. If we further
expand our thought experiment to the extent that distant stars completely
surround the single isolated star in all directions, we should expect
to find two very interesting statistically geometric developments.
These “developments”
of our thought experiment are logically inherent features of a cosmic
statistical geometry. In fact, the very position of the individual stars
themselves must also be positioned on the cosmic statistical geometric
matrix “grid” at very dense crossing “points,”
with galaxies forming at even more prevalent crossing points within the
universal cosmic geometry. Even the gravity of Super Massive Black Holes,
detected at the center of galaxies, could be explained by a model such
as this. Addressing
the General Relativity view of Gravity warping space or “spacetime“,
this proposed model gives a more logical and intuitive way of understanding
just what that could possibly mean. Look at it this way: within a three
dimensional space there is a truly applicable way of adding extra dimensions
(pertinent variables) within that same space. For instance, Density, Pressure
and Temperature. These interconnected variables could and do vary within
certain space parameters and will change in a significant way how matter
or energy move and how fast (how much time it takes) to move through different
densities, pressures and temperatures. So instead of a trampoline picture
of a spacetime fabric, picture an onion with concentric spheres of increasing
density layers from the outer layers to the center. This would be a proper
depiction of the model purposed here, and would neatly utilize existing
relativistic mathematical analyses with only a slightly different understanding
The seeming curvature of space by gravity is explained by the increased
density of particles and energies approaching a cosmic geometric node
or crossing “point.” Or you could think of this as the way
in which spacetime is warped by gravity. If this heuristic
consideration of gravity proves to be one of reasonable possibility, then
a congruent geometric model at the atomic scale could be considered as
a foundational model to postulate how Matter rematerializes within geometrically
configured gravitational points or regions throughout the cosmos. Such
a model would neatly conform with the nearly perfect integer progression
of the Periodic Table of Chemistry in the way that the elements have been
analyzed to exist in nature. It could also explain what happens in the
quantum world while going from one quantum state to another as a simple
rebalancing of photonic pressures at geometrically determined atomic grid
points. Inherent in this atomic scale model is a straight forward vector or tensor way of viewing a structure in which all four of the categorized forces of nature (Gravity, ElectroMagnetism, the Weak and the Strong Nuclear forces) could work as aspects of the same super fine “particle” movements, unifying all their underlying first principles into one comprehensive model. These correlations will be expanded upon in subsequent articles on the following aspects of this model:


TINY BITS part 1 GRAVITY  J. Aaron Nicholson  Nov.
15, 2007 