In the UVS worldview, the entire structure of the observable universe is formed in a topsy-turvy vortical universe, and it is thus intrinsically imbued with its paradoxical nature for all its vortical manifestations.

In the vortical universe, all physical existences and the underlying structures of natural phenomena are harmonically resonated to vortically form, they therefore are inherited with its paradoxical characteristic.

“The entire observable universe is subliminally paradoxical.” - UVS inspired -

From the UVS perspective, the paradoxical effect of nature caused by the topsy-turvy characteristic of the vortical universe, could manifest all sorts of subliminally negated circumstances to naturally obfuscate the observations of natural phenomena; the vortex mechanism of the vortical universe causes all sorts of natural cognitive paradox in the naturally negated observations of natural phenomena.

The paradoxical effect of nature, subliminally manifests cognitive paradoxes by negating the observations of natural phenomena in topsy-turvy manners, and thus enigmatically renders these obfuscated observations in all sorts of subliminally negated circumstances.

The analyses on the paradoxical effect of nature for epistemic theories of truth in the UVS research with its grounded theory method, are focused on resolving natural cognitive paradoxes with their inductive resolutions on the naturally negated observations of the natural phenomena that demonstrate vortical characteristics. These are through identifying the vortical structures of unisonal vortex in the natural phenomena for their analyses with the UVS model in its conceptual frameworks, and thus understands the mechanism of their natural negations, as on how the delusions are subliminally rendered with the manifested cognitive paradoxes in their naturally negated circumstances.

A vortical fractal of unisonal vortex.

Heuristically, this can elevate the perceptions of an observer for the natural phenomena to their transcendental perspectives to know how the cognitive paradoxes are counterintuitive, how they can mislead people with their delusional observations, and to fundamentally understand how such naturally negated observations, have had subliminally led to their cognitive paradox fallacies.

Remark: The Foucault pendulum is a concrete proof on the Earth rotates.

The delusional observation of a morning rising Sun, is paradoxically a cognitive contradiction of its actuality.

For millenniums in the past, the majority of people from all over the whole wide world in its illusion of knowing about the Sun, were incognizantly misled by its delusion, and thus has had led to its physical paradoxes with all sorts of geocentrism.

The illusion of knowing in a delusion, is apparently real in its cognitive paradox.

A paradoxical effect can consistently fool us with its cognitive paradox in its state of delusion.

“Delusion is the mother of all its illusions of knowledge.” - UVS inspired -

With manifold negating factors that are naturally manifested, the paradoxical effect of nature causes natural phenomena to be intermingled with multifarious cognitive paradoxes for their apparent observations. As thus, these observations would always paradoxically render as enigmas by obfuscating in all sorts of subliminally negated circumstances. These enigmas of nature, are naturally rendered in their manifold delusional observations, they therefore are counterintuitive, mysterious, confusing, and paradoxically misleading.

Paradoxically, the Sun does not rise in the east like it apparently seems to be, it is not stationary like it had been believed to be so with the putative laws of physics that postulates heliocentrism, and it is also not the center of the Solar System like it is being thought as with conventional wisdom; nothing could be further from the truth than these false facts of past and present that were conceived in all sorts of delusion about the Sun.

See the UVS subtopics on "The cognitive paradox fallacy in Copernican heliocentrism" that elaborates on the unisonal vortex mechanism of the Solar System with its cognitive paradox resolved in its transcendental perspective, and "The vortically manifested planetary orbitals" that elaborates on the vortical nature of the Solar System.

Without realizing the cognitive paradoxes that negate to cause delusions in the observable universe, the paradoxical effect of nature has had fooled even the very intelligent people.

The realization of a manifested paradoxical effect in its transcendental perspective, could elucidate its delusion.

With the delusion of a natural phenomenon elucidated, it reveals the natural negation of its manifested paradoxical effect that subliminal causes its cognitive paradox.

See the UVS subtopic on “The cognitive paradox fallacy in cosmic inflation on accelerated expansion of space” that elaborates on how the cognitive paradox of an important modern discovery in astrophysics, was methodically resolved with its delusion elucidated.

In the observable universe, the apparently observed natural phenomena that are being paradoxically rendered in all sorts of naturally negated circumstances, are overwhelming.

With an inductive intuition approach to analyse apparently observed natural phenomena in the conceptual frameworks of UVS, construed with their hypothetical constructs based on the UVS model for illustrating their underlying structures and mechanisms, it could elucidate their delusions to resolve their cognitive paradoxes.

Intuition is a cognitive function that has the ability to acquire knowledge without conscious reasoning. And a knowledge induced by intuition with pristine clarity in its visualization, has the element of surprise with a rush of jubilation for its enlightenment in a state of awakening that disperses its state of delusion. With the insight and intuition for the actuality of a paradoxically rendered natural phenomenon, it could elucidate its delusion for resolving its cognitive paradox in its visualization, and thus solves the misconception, mystery, or anomaly of its apparent observation.

“The only real valuable thing is intuition.” - Albert Einstein

Being enlightened in the conceptual frameworks of UVS with their inductive resolutions, has an awakening effect for understanding how nature could render natural phenomena in all sorts of subliminally negated circumstances. This is by discerning the subliminally manifested paradoxical effects, so as to resolve all sorts of cognitive paradoxes that are manifested with all sorts of negations in a typical topsy-turvy manner.

The awakening from delusion is enlightenment; awakened from delusion is enlightening.

Enlightenment on the paradoxical effect of nature, enlightens.

By knowing the paradoxical effect of nature, it enlightens on how nature renders delusions in a typical topsy-turvy manner.

The enigmas of the natural phenomena, could be resolved by knowing how the paradoxical effect of nature, subliminally negates to cause the circumstances of their observational delusions. As such, this epistemic process in its coherently grounded transcendental perspectivalism, could elucidate with the mental models of the UVS hypothetical constructs, and thus induces critical visual thinkings for resolving the delusions of those enigmatic natural phenomena that are paradoxically rendered. This approach with elucidated delusions, intuitively induces the resolutions that have very profound resolving capabilities for the revelations of their subliminal actualities.

“By elucidating delusions, it induces the resolutions on actualities.” - UVS inspired -

The contemplations on the enigmas of natural phenomena in their explorations, can be analogous to a person who is working out for a way to get out of the wood at night, and has been stumbling in the dark to no avail. Then with unexpected flashes of lightning bolts, whatever that were obfuscated in the dark, are suddenly illuminated to render the visuals for the scenes that were obscured by darkness. The optically negated actualities, are thus visually lit up in the sudden overall illuminations. These thus render the visualizations that therefore could resolve the enigmas, and thus trigger their explosions of discoveries.

Flashes of lightning bolts.

For the discovery of Archimedes' Principle, a breakthrough was made while Archimedes was taking a bath, he noticed that the level of the water in the tub rose as he got in, and realized that this effect could be used to determine the volume of the crown for a task he has undertaken at then. For practical purposes water is incompressible, so the submerged crown would displace an amount of water equal to its own volume. By dividing the weight of the crown by the volume of water displaced, the density of the crown could be obtained, and this was an intractable problem previously. Archimedes is said to have been so eager to share his realization that he leapt out of his bathtub and ran through the streets of Syracuse naked in a rush of jubilation proclaiming "Eureka!". Notice how the breakthrough critical visual thinking was popped into his awareness at an instance with a subtle hint that is usually overlooked in a common everyday event.

An inductive resolution that elucidates to resolve an enigma, and thus triggers its explosion of discoveries, is enlightened intuitively.

See the UVS topic on “Significant revolutionary discoveries of the UVS research" for some illustrations on the inductive resolutions of natural phenomena.

To understand how the inductive resolutions of the UVS research made their revolutionary discoveries, one should experience the discovery process himself. This can begin by exploring the abstracts on “The UVS model” and “The UVS worldview”, and then practice it on those resolved cognitive paradoxes of the paradoxically rendered natural phenomena, so as to understand the paradoxical effect of nature on how it renders all sorts of delusive circumstances in a typical topsy-turvy manner for their apparent observations.

After realizing the paradoxical effect of a paradoxically observed natural phenomenon, and at the moment of being snapped out of its delusion in its awakening, it could intuitively resolve its cognitive paradox with its transcendental perspective for perceiving its actuality in the conceptual frameworks of UVS. Thereafter, other comparable natural phenomena in the generalization of a nested vortical paradigm that is scalable and systematically transformable with the UVS model, could be explored with its comparative analyses in the UVS worldview, and can be investigated by addressing their comparable paradoxical effects to efficaciously resolve their cognitive paradoxes.

Essentially, this is an epistemic process with positive feedback loops for the inductive resolutions on those comparable natural phenomena, where their apparent observations are also appearing to be enigmatic as a result of their manifested cognitive paradoxes that are similarly rendering their delusional observations in a typical topsy-turvy manner.

See "Preface" for suggestions on how to effectively explore the UVS treatise, and the "Afterword of UVS" for more insights into the developmental background of the UVS treatise.

For the application of the UVS grounded methodology on any enigmatic natural phenomenon that could be paradoxically rendered, first develops its hypothetical construct for perceiving its actuality by moulding it systematically to explicate its underlying structure and mechanism based on the UVS model. Then contemplates to resolve its cognitive paradox with the inductive intuition approach in the conceptual frameworks of UVS, and then test the aroused inspiration with the UVS' theory of knowledge for its criteria of truth to evaluate its actuality. Apply necessary discretions appropriately to check with qualitative rigor for cogency, and also discreetly avoid the pitfalls of self-fulfilling prophecy.

It would be an awe-inspiring experience in an awakened state of enlightenment when one begins to realize how a natural wonder, could be actually working with its delusion elucidated in its inductive resolution. And with its epiphany, there are immerse interest and joys in finding things out. It is mesmerizing to learn with the elucidated delusion, which would arouse the enthusiasm to dig up every information to understand any related working principle for what was being revealed, and thus drives us to turn every stone to find answers that could lead to evidence for supporting or against the inspired actuality.

With the enlightenments, it can be incredibly easy to perceive the actualities of enigmatic natural phenomena, but paradoxically, under all sorts of subliminally negated circumstances, the state of such enlightenments can be extremely hard to attain. Despite the paradoxical effect of nature could be explicitly understood, under negated circumstances, its essence could be extremely difficult to accept or grasp.

Under negated circumstances, when interpreting the actuality of a natural phenomenon as apparently observed, we could always be fooled by our preconceived ideas that innately arise with our inherent shortcomings. What we have believed as its actuality is one thing, what is its actuality could be another thing.

“The only thing that interferes with my learning is my education.” - Albert Einstein

The paradoxical effect of nature would always cause such natural phenomena to be counterintuitive for the subliminally obfuscated observers; the actualities for such natural phenomena are always obfuscated in delusions that would subliminally negate our perceptions to mislead us in topsy-turvy manners. Our awareness with preconceived ideas in fixed mindsets are usually focused to only perceive what we have subconsciously prepared to accept, hence we are always misled by all sorts of manifested paradoxical effects with all sorts of delusion perceived in all sorts of topsy-turvy circumstances.

Always examine ourselves inward, the shortcomings such as flaws and limits are absolutely within us. And as a result of our obscured perceptions and limited bandwidths in many aspects, the actualities of subliminally negated natural phenomena are therefore not apparent to us. Don't be stubborn with our preconceived ideas, don't condition our thought with our wish for how should the natural events are being done, don't be impatient when fathoming any enigmatic natural phenomenon, don't confine the abilities of nature in our thoughts, don't be outright denial with what is being revealed to us, and most of all, don't let our ego rule.

The hardest part is with the egoistic attitude in us that would hold us from truly letting go preconceived ideas, and these would block us from any opportunity at all for resolving the cognitive paradox of any natural phenomenon that is paradoxically rendered; our ego would negate our intuition to obscure us from being able to realize the cognitive paradoxes that are rendered in delusive circumstances.

Such preconceived ideas could only lead us to visualize any natural phenomenon with its confirmation bias, caused by how we have anticipated a preferred outcome that subconsciously would satisfy our deep-seated belief. Thus, our perception would always end up regressing inside paradoxical realms to let us firmly believe that all things are already thoroughly investigated, fully covered, and correctly understood to the rank and file levels. And with such illusions of knowing that are asserted with preconceived ideas, we can relentlessly fool ourselves in all sorts of delusion.

See the UVS topic on "Logic and belief systems" that elaborates on the causalities from first principles for all sorts of science delusion.

When fathoming any natural phenomenon for its actuality, we must not fool ourselves.

Ironically, we must not be afraid of being fooled; we are fools fooling ourselves by afraid of being fooled after we are being subliminally fooled.

See the UVS topic on "Critiques of the scientific method" that elaborates on how we are being subliminally fooled by some deep-seated beliefs.

The more we think we know something, the least we would explore outside our preconceived ideas at the ease of our comfort zone, and the more hindrance we would have with our arrogant when fathoming any natural phenomenon for its actuality.

Regardless of how much we think we know about the actuality of a natural phenomenon, we have to be humble so as to become hollowed out for its ground work research, and accept that we could be fooled as a result of its subliminal negation. And to become truly humble for contemplating on the actualities of natural phenomena, it needs internalized cultivation to subdue our ego. This prerequisitely requires us to recognize and know that the hindrances and shortcomings are within us, and honestly acknowledges that inherently we all are cognitively negated ignorant fools.

To fathom any natural phenomenon with the UVS model in its conceptual frameworks, all other preconceived ideas have to be put aside until we are hollowed out enough so as to become receptive to new ideas without prejudice, so that we would not reject and can thus conceptually visualize to contemplate on any inspiration that could be entirely different from what has been firmly believed.

Under all sorts of subliminally negated circumstances, only by being hollowed out and has a pure intention to know, we could then be inspired on the actualities of the natural phenomena to become disillusioned of our preconceptions.

This is no mean feat, and our ego need to be tamed and properly dealt with. This is especially so when we are trying to really let go any deep-seated belief in its disbelief while overcoming our ego. And consequently we could undergo extreme traumatic mental experiences, such as become unreasonably denial, psychologically stressed, emotionally depressed, or devastatingly anguished; in cognitive dissonance it can be very agonizing to face a total collapse of our hard-core belief.

See an externally linked topic on "How to Break out of Your Social Comfort Zone" that elaborates on some tips for breaking out of comfort zone.

To resolve a paradoxically rendered natural phenomenon in the conceptual frameworks of UVS, its observation has to be brought to its transcendental perception with its underlying structure and mechanism perceived with the UVS model, so as to be able to conceptually visualize it, vividly imagine it, and interact with it rationally in its critical visual thinking to comprehend it intuitively.

With the envisonment for the postulated underlying structure and mechanism of the natural phenomenon, it could thus intuitively induce the resolution for perceiving its actuality.

In the contemplating process, have integrity, and be absolutely honest with ourselves on any finding. Without a slightest attachment to our thoughts on the finding, have perseverance and stay focused. Put our preconceived ideas aside so as to free our imagination, and surrender our rigid mind to our intuition. Do not expect anything but be opened to everything including contradictions, let the imagination run, let it organise, and let it show.

Recapitulating on the example for resolving the delusory perception of sunrise, its delusion could be elucidated with its transcendental visualization of the Solar System on how a rotating spheroidal Earth, is rendering the relative motion illusion of a morning rising Sun in its delusory localized perception. With this transcendental perception, we therefore could visualize how it subliminally negates to render its cognitive paradox, which is as a result of the Earth's rotating motion is paradoxically appearing to be motionless for the earthbound observers. The elucidated delusion of its apparent observation, thus intuitively reveals its actuality that resolves its cognitive paradox.

When the perception of a paradoxically rendered natural phenomenon in its transcendental visualization, is coherently organized with pristine clarity in the conceptual frameworks of UVS, we could be unexpectedly enlightened by an intuition that thus elucidates its delusion. This would reveal its actuality for resolving its cognitive paradox in the realism of objective reality, and thus solves the misconception, mystery, or anomaly of its apparent observation.

By knowing the paradoxical effect of nature that subliminally negates in a typical topsy-turvy manner, and with the conceived hypothetical constructs that are coherently based on the UVS model, in the transcendental perspectivalism of the UVS conceptual frameworks, the inductive resolutions of the UVS research thus intuitively enlighten to reveal the actualities of the paradoxically rendered natural phenomena.

Some resonated remarks received that are relevant to Universal Vortical Singularity (aka UVS) on "The paradoxical effect of nature":

“Cognitive paradoxes are events whose subjective reality is overwhelming.” (20 Aug 2015)
- Neil Vodavzny

“With great admiration.” (3rd June 2014)
- Dr. Vuthipong Priebjrivat, B.S. in civil engineering from Massachusetts Institute of Technology, M.S. in environmental engineering from Stanford University, Ph.D. in economics and public management from the University of Chicago, metaphysicist, corporate leader, law maker, and author of several books such as "DRAW YOUR THOUGHTS" that elaborates and illustrates a peculiar type of analytical method, "DHARMODYNAMICS", "NEODHARMA", "DHARMOSCIENCE", "SANKHARA" that coherently elaborate with "draw your thoughts" on some intrinsic structures for nature of reality in its transcendental perspectivalism.

“UVS is a paradox that will bring another paradigm shift...A giant step toward TOE. ” (8th Aug 2012)
- James A. Graber (aka Jag of TOEQuest Forum) with twenty-eight years into vortex research.

“I can hardly wait for you to enlighten the world to a new way of seeing the dynamics of Reality.” (17th Oct 2010)
- Allen Barrow (aka PoPpAScience of TOEQuest Forum).

“An intriguing website full of enlightening concepts and analyses!” (Dec 2009)
- Dr. Wayne Nowland, physicist, researcher, philosopher & author of Interdimensional Science & Philosophy, planned and launched Australia's first AUSSAT communications satellite system.

“Vincent, I am convinced that UVS would give satisfactory answers to most of the mysteries...” (20th Sep 2008)
- Dipayan Kar (aka dipayankar of TOEQuest Forum).

“Objectively speaking, even in its present mostly qualitative form, UVS makes a significant contribution to the discovery of spiral nature of the universe. No person holds a complete truth about the nature of the universe, and UVS brings attention of scientists to an interesting path of solving this very challenging problem.”
“With great respect, Vladimir.” (28th Jun 2009)
- Dr. Vladimir B. Ginzburg, mathematician, accomplished material scientist, author of "Prime Elements of Ordinary Matter, Dark Matter & Dark Energy", "Spiral Grain of the Universe" and several other renowned books such as "Metallurgical Design of Flat Rolled Steels" for applied science, and holds over fifty U.S. and foreign patents.

“Vincent I think I finally got you; the whole universe is twisted!” (2008)
- Graham Burnett (aka G_burnett of TOEQuest Forum).

“OH boyohboyohboy ... Consciousness of natural event, paradoxical from the beginning, paradoxical from reasoning, paradoxical from rationalization, paradoxical from depiction, and on and on the paradoxes go .... even when we say consciousness ends the paradox is it does not, so there will be then ... what? Paradoxes for it all?” (2008)
- Graham Burnett (aka G_burnett of TOEQuest Forum)

“I am studying very hard right now on the many aspects of the vortex. It is amazing how many endless paths it takes me down. When I am in wikipedia, I find myself many times over clicking 6 pages deep just to read one sentence that I started in the first page. I have read most of this knowledge before, but I find with the "Universal Vortical Singularity" at the forefront of my mind, it is like reading it for the first time with all new ways of see it. Its like being a kid in a candy store once again.” (13th April 2008)
- Allen Barrow (aka PoPpAScience of TOEQuest Forum)

“It is funny how I did not see it before, the out right dominance of the Vortex phenomena. All the endless studying I have done on so many subjects to do with science, and the best I could see was, spin. Now I see vortices in every thing I see. Its amazing how one can miss something so important. It is great to once again see the workings of the Universe with new eyes.” (10th Apr 2008)
- Allen Barrow (aka PoPpAScience of TOEQuest Forum).

References and links:
Observable universe - From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Epistemic theories of truth - From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Natural phenomenon - From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Worldview - From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Heuristic - From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Sunrise - From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Geocentrism - From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Perspective - From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Perceptions - From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Universe - From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Heliocentrism - From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Solar System - From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Conventional wisdom - From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Centripetal force - From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Centrifugal forces - From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Conservation of energy - From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Physical paradox - From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Understanding - From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Inductive approach - From Research Methodology
Transcendental perspectivalism - From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Hypothetical construct - From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Knowledge - From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Visual thinking - From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Mental model - From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Generalization - From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Criteria of truth - From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Epiphany - From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Self-fulfilling prophecy - From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Archimedes' Principle - From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Eureka - From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Confirmation bias - From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Belief - From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Comfort zone - From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Cognitive dissonance - From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Realism - From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The objective reality - From Joan Caccaro of Griffith University
Lightning animation - Prince Adrien
Wobbling spheres animation - ThinkQuest Library
Image of sunrise - Image credit of Vincent Wee-Foo

counter was reset on 02/02/2010

Disclaimers: The treatise of Universal Vortical Singularity (UVS) in its epistemological paradigm shift, is fundamentally unconventional. Its hypotheses based on a generally unheard-of UVS model, bound to have shortcomings, such as loose ends, errors, and omissions errors. Many details and assumptions in its propositions have yet to be further researched, probed, evaluated, validated, or verified. Its implicit explanations are for casual understanding of the UVS topics presented in the UVS worldview, so if any term or statement is offensive in any manner or from whatsoever perspectives, is most regretted. Links to other sites do not imply endorsement of their contents; apply appropriate discretion whenever necessary. Remarks: Despite the shortcomings, it was intended to offer readers the drift of the UVS research methodology for its insights, and thereby the experts in their relevant fields could refine or improve on the UVS topics.

Viewing tips: Despite the presentations of the UVS web pages has went through much accommodation for their viewings on smart phones, they are not very friendly to smaller low resolution mobile devices. It is therefore recommended to access and view the UVS contents with a system device that at least has a larger high definition screen, such as a larger smart phone, an android tablet, or an iPad. For the best experiences, use a MS Windows based PC or computer system to browse with Internet Explorer or Mozilla Firefox that is Java enabled for its interactive applets. (Such as Java Applet of Moiré pattern, JPL Small-Body Database Browser, and Planet Finder.)

Copyright information: This UVS web site is for non-profit purposes and not for commercial use. Wherever possible, direct credits to the origins of the works or images were provided, be it on fair dealings, with explicit permission from their owners, or the materials were believed to be from the public domain.