“The entire observable universe is subliminally paradoxical.” - UVS inspired -

In the UVS worldview, the entire structure of the observable universe is intrinsically formed in a vortical system of the cosmos that could negate to obfuscate in the objective reality. All physical states of existence and the underlying structures of natural phenomena are thus inherently imbued with its paradoxical characteristics.

This paradoxical nature of reality is subliminally caused by the delusional characteristics of the cosmic hypersphere, and it manifests all possible manners of its subliminally negated circumstances by obfuscating the observations of the natural phenomena. The effect subliminally renders all kinds of natural cognitive paradoxes with their natural negations, and thus obfuscate to render the paradoxical observations of the natural phenomena that contradicts their actualities.

These are through identifying the various forms of nested torus structures and their inferred unisonal vortices, which are being demonstrated elusively in the empirically observed natural phenomena. They are then analyzed with the UVS model in its conceptual framework, which could thus induce the insights for resolving their subliminal negations. This epistemic process could elucidate how the observational delusions in their subliminally negated circumstances, are rendering their cognitive paradoxes.

A nested solid torus structure.

A vortical fractal of unisonal vortex.

See the UVS subtopic on "The metaphors for half-integral spin" that elaborates on a negation mechanism of the cosmic hypersphere.

Heuristically, this can elevate the perceptions of an observer for the natural phenomena to their transcendental perspectives to know how the cognitive paradoxes negate their actualities, how they mislead people with their delusionally perceived observations, and to fundamentally understand how such naturally negated observations, have had subliminally led to their cognitive paradox fallacies.

The delusional observation of a morning rising Sun, is paradoxically a cognitive contradiction of its actuality.

For millenniums in the past, the majority of people from all over the whole wide world in its illusion of knowing about the Sun, were incognizantly misled by its delusion, and thus has had led to its physical paradoxes with all sorts of geocentrism.

The illusion of knowing in a delusion, is apparently real in its cognitive paradox.

A paradoxical effect can consistently fool us with its cognitive paradox in its state of delusion.

“Delusion is the mother of all its illusions of knowledge.” - UVS inspired -

See the UVS subtopics on "The cognitive paradox fallacy in Copernican heliocentrism" that elaborates on the unisonal vortex mechanism of the Solar System with its cognitive paradox resolved in its transcendental perspective, and "The vortically manifested planetary orbitals" that elaborates on the vortical nature of the Solar System.

With manifold negating factors that are subliminally manifested, the paradoxical effect of the cosmos causes natural phenomena to be intermingled with multifarious cognitive paradoxes for their apparent observations. As thus, these observations would always paradoxically render as enigmas by obfuscating to contradict their actualities in a combination of subliminally negated circumstances. These enigmas of the natural phenomena are thus rendered in their manifold delusional observations, they therefore are counterintuitive, mysterious, confusing, and paradoxically misleading.

Paradoxically, the Sun does not rise in the east like it seems to be, it is not stationary like it had been believed to be so with the putative laws of physics that assert heliocentrism, and it is also not the center of the Solar System like it was being thought as with its conventional wisdom; nothing could be further from the truth than these false facts that were established in all sorts of delusion about the Sun.

Without realizing the cognitive paradoxes that naturally negate to cause delusions in the observable universe, the paradoxical effect of the cosmos has had fooled even the very intelligent people.

The realization of a manifested paradoxical effect in its transcendental perspective, could elucidate its delusion.

With the delusion of a natural phenomenon elucidated, it reveals the natural negation of its manifested paradoxical effect that renders the subliminally negated circumstances for causing its cognitive paradox.

See the UVS subtopic on “The cognitive paradox fallacy in cosmic inflation on accelerated expansion of space” that elaborates on how the cognitive paradox of a hallmark modern discovery in astrophysics, was methodically resolved with its delusion elucidated.

In the observable universe, the apparently observed natural phenomena that are being paradoxically rendered in all possible manners of their subliminally negated circumstances, are overwhelming.

With the inductive approach of the UVS research to intuitively analyze apparently observed natural phenomena in the conceptual framework of UVS, construed with their hypothetical constructs based on the UVS model for illustrating their underlying vortical structures and mechanisms, it could elucidate their delusions to efficaciously resolve the subliminally negated circumstances that render their cognitive paradoxes.

Intuition is a cognitive function that has the ability to acquire knowledge without conscious reasoning. And with the visualization intuitively induced in its state of awakening for acquiring knowledge, it has the element of surprise with a rush of jubilation for its enlightenment when its state of delusion is dispersed. With the intuition and its insight for the actuality of a paradoxically rendered natural phenomenon, it could elucidate its delusion for resolving its cognitive paradox, and thus solves the misconception, mystery, or anomaly of its apparent observation.

“The only real valuable thing is intuition.” - Albert Einstein

Being enlightened in the conceptual framework of UVS with their inductive resolutions, has an awakening effect for understanding how the delusions of natural phenomena, could be rendered in all possible manners of their subliminally negated circumstances. This is by discerning the subliminally manifested paradoxical effects, so as to resolve all kinds of natural cognitive paradoxes that are manifested with all sorts of negations in a typical obfuscated manner.

The awakening from delusion is enlightenment; awakened from delusion is enlightening.

Enlightenment on the paradoxical effect of the cosmos, enlightens.

By realizing the paradoxical effect of the cosmos, it enlightens on how natural phenomena could be negated to render their delusions in a typical obfuscated manner.

The enigmas of the natural phenomena could be resolved by knowing how the paradoxical effect of the cosmos subliminally negates, which are causing the circumstances of their observational delusions.

This epistemic process in its coherently grounded transcendental perspectivalism, could enlighten with the insights of the UVS hypothetical constructs that explicate their underlying structures and mechanisms. This approach could intuitively induce the resolutions that have very profound resolving capability for the revelations of their obfuscated actualities. And with their induced visual thinkings, it therefore could elucidate the delusions of those paradoxically rendered natural phenomena.

“By elucidating delusions, it induces the resolutions on actualities.” - UVS inspired -

The enlightenment experienced with the UVS research when resolving an enigmatic natural phenomenon, could be analogous to a person is attempting to find the way out in an outskirt area to no avail during the night fall. Then with the unexpected flashes of lightning bolts, whatever that were obfuscated in the darkness, are suddenly illuminated to render the visuals for the scenes that were obscured by darkness. The optically negated scenarios, are thus briefly lit up in the sudden overall illuminations. These strokes of sudden illumination thus render the visualizations that could resolve the enigmas, and so forth triggered their explosions of discoveries.

Strokes of lightning bolts dispersing the darkness instantly.

For the discovery of Archimedes' Principle, a breakthrough was made while Archimedes was taking a bath, he noticed that the level of the water in the tub rose as he got in, and realized that this effect could be used to determine the volume of the crown for a task he has undertaken at then. For practical purposes water is incompressible, so the submerged crown would displace an amount of water equal to its own volume. By dividing the weight of the crown by the volume of water displaced, the density of the crown could be obtained, and this was an intractable problem previously. Archimedes is said to have been so eager to share his realization that he leapt out of his bathtub and ran through the streets of Syracuse naked in a rush of jubilation proclaiming "Eureka!". Take note how that critical visual thinking for the breakthrough was induced at a stroke with just a subtle hint.

See the UVS topic on “Significant revolutionary discoveries of the UVS research" for some case studies on the inductive resolutions of natural phenomena.

To understand how the inductive resolutions of the UVS research made their revolutionary discoveries in the case studies, one should experience the discovery process himself. This can begin by assimilating the UVS cosmological model, and then practice it on those well-resolved cognitive paradoxes of the paradoxically rendered natural phenomena that are easier to comprehend. Try to understand the manifested paradoxical effects on how it could render all possible manners of their subliminally negated circumstances, which are being manifested in a typical obfuscated manner to negate the observations of these natural phenomena.

After realizing the negation of a paradoxically observed natural phenomenon, and at the moment of being snapped out of its delusion in the state of its enlightenment, it could intuitively resolve its cognitive paradox with its transcendental perspective to perceive its actuality in the conceptual framework of UVS. Thereafter, other comparable natural phenomena in the generalization of a nested vortical paradigm that is scalable and systematically transformable with the UVS model, could be explored with its comparative analyses by addressing their comparable paradoxical effects to efficaciously resolve their cognitive paradoxes.

Essentially, this is an epistemic process with its nested positive feedback loop for inducing the inductive resolution on those comparable natural phenomena, where their apparent observations on different scale levels are also appearing to be enigmatic as a result of their typically manifested natural cognitive paradoxes.

An inductive resolution of the UVS research that enlightens intuitively, and therefore at a stroke resolves the enigma of a paradoxically rendered natural phenomenon, could therefore trigger its explosion of discoveries.

See "Preface" for suggestions on how to effectively explore the UVS treatise, and the "Afterword of UVS" that elaborates on the inception of the UVS research.

“The structure of the observable universe is a nested vortical hypersphere, which is
being formed in the vortical transformations of a nested torus paradigm.” - UVS inspired -

For the application of the UVS grounded methodology on any enigmatic natural phenomenon that could be paradoxically rendered, first contemplates in the UVS worldview to develop its hypothetical construct to explicate its underlying vortical structure and mechanism based on the UVS model. Then with the inductive approach contemplates in its conceptual framework to intuitively resolve its cognitive paradox, and then evaluate its inspired insight with the UVS' theory of knowledge for its criteria of truth to investigate the perceived actuality.

It would be an awe-inspiring experience in the awakened state of its enlightenment when one begins to realize the actuality of an enigmatic natural phenomenon, which is being enlightened at a stroke when its delusion is elucidated in its inductive resolution. This would drive us to turn every stone for its evaluations, which might lead to evidence for supporting or against the transpired actuality. Nonetheless, discreetly avoid the pitfalls of self-fulfilling prophecy, and applies necessary discretions appropriately to check with qualitative rigor for cogency.

With the enlightenment, it could be incredibly simple and easy to perceive the actualities of the enigmatic natural phenomena. However, under all possible manners of their subliminally negated circumstances, the state of such enlightenments could be extremely hard to attain. Despite the paradoxical effect of the cosmos could be explicitly understood, its abstraction under all sorts of negations are extremely difficult to grasp or accept at all especially for the very well-informed people.

Under negated circumstances, when interpreting the actuality of a natural phenomenon as apparently observed, we could always be fooled by our hard-core beliefs of the mainstream endorsed scientific method of the modern science.

See the UVS topics "Critique of the scientific method on its intrinsic flaws" that elaborates on how we are being subliminally fooled by some deep-seated beliefs of modern science, "Logic and belief systems" that elaborates on the causalities from first principles for all sorts of science delusion.

What we have undoubtedly believed as a reality is one thing, what is its actuality could be another thing.

“The only thing that interferes with my learning is my education.” - Albert Einstein

The paradoxical effect of the cosmos would always cause such natural phenomena to be counterintuitive for the subliminally obfuscated observers; the actualities for such natural phenomena are always obfuscated in delusions that would subliminally negate our perceptions to mislead us. Our awareness in the fixed mind sets of our hard-core beliefs are naturally focused to only perceive what we have subconsciously prepared to accept. Hence, we are always subconsciously misled by all sorts of manifested paradoxical effects with all sorts of delusion perceived in all sorts of obfuscated circumstances.

As a result of our obscured perceptions and limitations in many aspects, the actualities of the subliminally negated natural phenomena are therefore not apparent to us. And always examine ourselves inward by introspecting; the shortcomings and flaws are absolutely within us. Don't be stubborn with our beliefs, don't condition our thought to our beliefs on how the natural phenomena are happening, don't be outright denial with what being revealed to us are contradicting our beliefs, and most of all, don't let our ego rule with our hard-core beliefs.

The hardest part is on dealing with our egocentric perceptions that would hold us from truly letting go our hard-core beliefs, which would obstruct us from any opportunity at all for resolving the cognitive paradox of any paradoxically rendered natural phenomenon; our ego would negate our intuition to obscure us from being able to realize the cognitive paradoxes that are subliminally rendered in negated circumstances.

Such beliefs could only lead us to appraise any natural phenomenon with its confirmation bias, caused by how we have anticipated a preferred outcome that subconsciously has satisfied our deep-seated belief. Thus, our perception would always end up regressing inside paradoxical realms to let us firmly believe all things are already thoroughly investigated, fully covered, and correctly understood to the rank and file levels. And with such illusions of knowing that assert our beliefs, we would relentlessly fool ourselves in all sorts of delusion.

Naturally, we all are cognitively negated fools.

When fathoming any natural phenomenon for its actuality, we must not fool ourselves.

Ironically, we must not be afraid of being fooled; we are fools fooling ourselves by afraid of being fooled after we are being subliminally fooled.

The more we think we know something, the least we would explore outside our hard-core beliefs for the ease in our comfort zone, and the more hindrance we would have with our arrogant when fathoming any natural phenomenon for its actuality.

Regardless of how much we think we know about the actuality of a natural phenomenon, we have to be humble so as to become hollowed out for its groundwork research, and accept that we could be fooled as a result of its subliminal negation. And to become truly humble for contemplating on the actualities of natural phenomena, it needs the humility to transcend our ego. This prerequisitely requires us to recognize and know that the hindrances and shortcomings are within us, and honestly acknowledges that inherently we all are cognitively negated fools.

To fathom any natural phenomenon with the UVS model in its conceptual framework, all hard-core beliefs have to be put aside until we are hollowed out enough so as to become receptive to the very bizarre ideology of a non-standard cosmological model without prejudice. Thus, we would not outrightly reject its postulation that contradicts our hard-core belief, and could therefore conceptually visualize to contemplate with its inspiration for what it is revealing.

Under all possibe manners of subliminally negated circumstances, only by being hollowed out with a pure intention to know, we could then be inspired to transpire the actualities of the natural phenomena to become disillusioned of our preconceptions.

This is no mean feat, and our ego needs to be vigilantly dealt with. This is especially so when we are trying to really let go any deep-seated belief in its disbelief while overcoming our egocentric perceptions. And consequently, we could undergo extreme traumatic mental experiences, such as become irrationally denial, psychologically stressed, emotionally depressed, or devastatingly anguished; in cognitive dissonance it can be very agonizing to face a total collapse of our hard-core beliefs.

See an externally linked topic on "How to Break out of Your Social Comfort Zone" that elaborates on some tips for breaking out of your comfort zone.

To resolve a paradoxically rendered natural phenomenon in the conceptual framework of UVS, its observation has to be brought to its transcendental perception with its underlying vortical structure and mechanism vividly perceived with the UVS model, so as to be able to conceptually visualize it for interacting with it in its conceptual thinking to comprehend it intuitively.

In the contemplating process, have integrity, and be absolutely honest with ourselves on any finding. Without the slightest attachment to our thoughts on the finding, have perseverance, and stay focused. Put our beliefs aside so as to free our imagination, and surrender our rigid mind to our intuition. Do not expect anything but be opened to everything including contradictions, and then let the imagination run, let it organise, and let it show.

When the perception of a paradoxically rendered natural phenomenon in its transcendental visualization, is coherently organized and vividly shown with the conceptual framework of UVS, we could be unexpectedly enlightened by its inspired intuition that elucidates its delusion. This could reveal its actuality for resolving its natural cognitive paradox, and would therefore transpire to solve the misconception, mystery, or anomaly of its apparent observation.

By visualizing the underlying vortical structures and mechanisms, it intuitively reveals the actualities of the mysteriously rendered natural phenomena.

“Work up imagination to the state of vision.” - William Blake

Recapitulating on the example for resolving the delusory perception of sunrise, its delusion could be elucidated with its transcendental visualization of the Solar System on how a rotating spheroidal Earth, is rendering the relative motion illusion of a morning rising Sun. With this transcendental perception, we therefore could perceive how it subliminally negates to naturally render its cognitive paradox, which is as a result of the Earth's rotating motion is paradoxically appearing to be motionless for the earthbound observers.

By knowing the paradoxical effect of the cosmos on how it could subliminally negate in a typical obfuscated manner, and with the conceived hypothetical constructs that are coherently construed with the UVS model, in the transcendental perspectivalism of the UVS conceptual framework, the inductive resolutions of the UVS research thus intuitively enlighten to reveal the actualities of the paradoxically rendered natural phenomena.

See the “Philosophical inspirations of UVS” for the excerpts of some all-encompassing sculptural ideas that were inspired in the UVS worldview.

Some resonated remarks received that are relevant to Universal Vortical Singularity (aka UVS) on "The paradoxical effect of the cosmos":

“Your work is really amazing.”/ “It's raining enlightenment!” (18th Dec 2017)
- Dr. Rosa Hilda Compagnucci, a climatologist accredited to the Nobel Peace Prize bestowed on the IPCC in 2007, PhD degree in Meteorological Sciences, University of Buenos Aires; UBA · Department of Atmospheric and Ocean Sciences. Co-authored paper on "Dynamical characterization of the last prolonged solar minima", which elaborates with quantitative analysis on an imminent Grand Minimum.

“Cognitive paradoxes are events whose subjective reality is overwhelming.” (20 Aug 2015)
- Neil Vodavzny

“With great admiration.” (3rd June 2014)
- Dr. Vuthipong Priebjrivat, B.S. in civil engineering from Massachusetts Institute of Technology, M.S. in environmental engineering from Stanford University, Ph.D. in economics and public management from the University of Chicago, metaphysicist, corporate leader, law maker, and author of several books such as "DRAW YOUR THOUGHTS" that elaborates and illustrates a peculiar type of analytical method, "DHARMODYNAMICS", "NEODHARMA", "DHARMOSCIENCE", "SANKHARA" that coherently elaborate with "draw your thoughts" on some intrinsic structures for nature of reality in its transcendental perspectivalism.

“UVS is a paradox that will bring another paradigm shift...A giant step toward TOE. ” (8th Aug 2012)
- James A. Graber (aka Jag of TOEQuest Forum) with twenty-eight years into vortex research.
* Paradox also refers to a statement or proposition that seems self-contradictory or absurd, but expresses a truth.

“Without a doubt, someday your theory will be the way of science!” (23rd July 2012)
- Allen Barrow (aka PoPpAScience of TOEQuest Forum)

“I can hardly wait for you to enlighten the world to a new way of seeing the dynamics of Reality.” (17th Oct 2010)
- Allen Barrow (aka PoPpAScience of TOEQuest Forum).

“An intriguing website full of enlightening concepts and analyses!” (Dec 2009)
- Dr. Wayne Nowland, physicist, researcher, philosopher & author of Interdimensional Science & Philosophy, planned and launched Australia's first AUSSAT communications satellite system.

“Vincent, I am convinced that UVS would give satisfactory answers to most of the mysteries...” (20th Sep 2008)
- Dipayan Kar (aka dipayankar of TOEQuest Forum).

“Objectively speaking, even in its present mostly qualitative form, UVS makes a significant contribution to the discovery of spiral nature of the universe. No person holds a complete truth about the nature of the universe, and UVS brings attention of scientists to an interesting path of solving this very challenging problem.”
“With great respect, Vladimir.” (28th Jun 2009)
- Dr. Vladimir B. Ginzburg, mathematician, accomplished material scientist, author of "Prime Elements of Ordinary Matter, Dark Matter & Dark Energy", "Spiral Grain of the Universe" and several other renowned books such as "Metallurgical Design of Flat Rolled Steels" for applied science, and holds over fifty U.S. and foreign patents.

“Vincent I think I finally got you; the whole universe is twisted!” (2008)
- Graham Burnett (aka G_burnett of TOEQuest Forum).

“OH boyohboyohboy ... Consciousness of natural event, paradoxical from the beginning, paradoxical from reasoning, paradoxical from rationalization, paradoxical from depiction, and on and on the paradoxes go .... even when we say consciousness ends the paradox is it does not, so there will be then ... what? Paradoxes for it all?” (2008)
- Graham Burnett (aka G_burnett of TOEQuest Forum)

“I am studying very hard right now on the many aspects of the vortex. It is amazing how many endless paths it takes me down. When I am in wikipedia, I find myself many times over clicking 6 pages deep just to read one sentence that I started in the first page. I have read most of this knowledge before, but I find with the "Universal Vortical Singularity" at the forefront of my mind, it is like reading it for the first time with all new ways of see it. Its like being a kid in a candy store once again.” (13th April 2008)
- Allen Barrow (aka PoPpAScience of TOEQuest Forum)

“It is funny how I did not see it before, the out right dominance of the Vortex phenomena. All the endless studying I have done on so many subjects to do with science, and the best I could see was, spin. Now I see vortices in every thing I see. Its amazing how one can miss something so important. It is great to once again see the workings of the Universe with new eyes.” (10th Apr 2008)
- Allen Barrow (aka PoPpAScience of TOEQuest Forum).

“Hi Vincent, I have been reading posts in forums like this one since forums began, and you are the first poster to spark my imagination again, and I like to thank you for this.” (31st Mar 2008)
- Allen Barrow (aka PoPpAScience of TOEQuest Forum).

References and links:
Cosmos - From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Observable universe - From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Natural phenomenon - From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The objective reality - From Joan Caccaro of Griffith University
Worldview - From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Heuristic - From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Sunrise - From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Geocentrism - From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Perspective - From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Perceptions - From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Universe - From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Heliocentrism - From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Solar System - From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Conventional wisdom - From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Centripetal force - From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Centrifugal forces - From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Conservation of energy - From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Physical paradox - From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Understanding - From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Inductive approach - From Research Methodology
Transcendental perspectivalism - From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Hypothetical construct - From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Knowledge - From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Visual thinking - From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Generalization - From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Criteria of truth - From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Self-fulfilling prophecy - From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Scientific method - From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Modern Science - From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Archimedes' Principle - From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Eureka - From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Confirmation bias - From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Belief - From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Comfort zone - From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Ideology - From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Non-standard cosmological model - From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Cognitive dissonance - From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Realism - From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Lightning bolts animation - Source: Linx Singapore
Wobbling spheres animation
Animated transformation of torus - By Lucas Vieira; Wiki Common
Animation for fratals of unisonal vortex - Vincent Wee-Foo
Image of sunrise - Image credit of Vincent Wee-Foo

counter was reset on 02/02/2010

Disclaimers: The treatise of Universal Vortical Singularity (UVS) in its epistemological paradigm shift, is fundamentally unconventional. Its hypotheses grounded on a generally unheard-of UVS model, bound to have shortcomings, such as loose ends, errors, and omissions errors. Many details and assumptions in its propositions have yet to be further researched, probed, evaluated, validated, or verified. Its implicit explanations are for casual understanding of the UVS topics presented in the UVS worldview, so if any term or statement is offensive in any manner from whatsoever perspectives, is most regretted. Links to other sites do not imply endorsement of their contents; apply appropriate discretion whenever necessary. Also, the content of the UVS topics, from time to time could be arbitrarily modified without any notice.

Viewing tips: Despite the presentations of the UVS web pages has went through much accommodation for their viewings on smart phones, they are still not entirely friendly to these mobile devices. For the best experiences, use a MS Windows based PC or computer system with Java enabled browser for running its interactive applets. (Such as Java Applet of Moiré pattern, JPL Small-Body Database Browser, and Planet Finder.)

Copyright information: This UVS web site is for non-profit purposes and not for commercial use. Wherever possible, direct credits to the origins of the works or images were provided, be it on fair dealings, with explicit permission from their owners, or the materials were believed to be from the public domain.