.
.The UVS visual inductive resolution on the hyperspherical pushed-in gravity

Based on the UVS model, the phenomenon of gravity is a repulsion effect that has vortically manifested in the nested vortical hypersphere of the cosmos[uvs].

With the image as illustrated on top right, visualize every line from the surface of the electrostatic spheroidal confinement to its core, is a longitudinal wave in the form of dipole quantized unisonal vortex, which has a perpetual vortical pushed-in effect towards the core. All mass is vortical interaction.

This suggests gravity is an effect of electrostatic pressure, and it is manifested by quantized vortices to push matters inward to the core in a spheroidal confinement with their vortical repulsion force. This renders as the effect of centripetal acceleration[w].

Gravitational force is manifested in the nested vortical hypersphere of the cosmos with the perpetual vortical push-in interaction of its aether vortical motion.

In the UVS worldview, these quantized unisonal vortices are spawned by aether vortical motion[uvs] with precession[w] effects in its spheroidal confinement that wobbles in a primary two-axis spin. The vortical interactions with the potential density of energy in its closed system consolidated by volumetric pressure in a spheroidal confinement, repels matter electrostatically inside a nested spheroidal torus vortex with reactive centrifugal force[w] generated by the manifested quantized vortices.

The image of a plasma lamp as illustrated on bottom right with loosely packed vortical structures, illuminated by the glowing plasma filaments, is for simulating the dynamics of tightly packed quantized electromagnetic vortices that renders the effect of pushed-in gravity.

The Newton's law of universal gravitation[w] with the assumption of a static Sun resembles Coulomb's law of electrical forces in an inertial frame of reference, which is used to approximately calculate the magnitude of electrical force between two charged bodies.

Both are inverse-square laws in their inertial frames of reference, in which the forces are inversely proportional to the square of the distance between the bodies.

Based on the UVS model, the empirically observed CMB dipole[uvs] in precession is coalesced by a spheroidal torus vortex[uvs] of hypersphere that encapsulates the entire observable universe[w] in its vortically manifested spheroidal volumetric pressure system.

In the UVS worldview, the phenomenon of energy in the closed system of the observable universe, is a physically manifested effect of a cosmic vortical motion of aether rendered by the precession effect of the cosmos.

In a nested spheroidal torus vortex (in essence this is a nested plasmatic bubble) of a hypersphere system[uvs] of 137 nested 3-spheres, the repulsive electrostatic force of negative pressure conserved in the encapsulation of its hypersphere would render an electrostatic potential density. With its density gradient approximately subjected to the principle of inverse-square law, it thus renders the effect of gravity.

Heuristically[w], luminiferous aether[w] pervades throughout the entire cosmos, and its potential density conserved in its vortically weaved nested boundaries to render the intrinsic volumetric pressure, is the causality of gravity in the macrocosms[d] and the microcosms[d].

Do an interactive experiment to contemplate the pushed-in effect of volumetric pressure

When a suction cup pressing on a smooth surface has its air molecules mechanically squeezed out within its enclosure, the suction cup would hold firmly onto the smooth surface. This is a pushed-in effect that is rendered by the atmospheric pressure. This simple interactive experiment demonstrates the concept of pushed-in effect for simulating the proposed pushed-in effect of gravity.

Perceivably, the air molecules are being persistently pushed toward the core with the inertial force repelled from the equipotential surface of the spheroidal air bubble, which is formed under atmospheric pressure.

Should the smaller bubble be induced to merge into the bigger bubble, the nitrogen molecules would be mixed in the nitrogen layer of the larger bubble, while the oxygen and carbon dioxide molecules, would be pushed by the nitrogen molecules to move toward the core to reach their spheroidal molecular clusters accordingly.

If a bubble of nitrogen is introduced inside the carbon dioxide spheroid at a six o'clock position as shown, it would be pushed outward by the heavier density carbon dioxide molecules, relatively rising to the surface on a easiest path, and could be observed to be moving in a vertical downward direction passing through the oxygen molecule layer, and eventually reaches the nitrogen layer.

Water around pushes against the balloon would be compacted to have density gradient following the inverse-square law of water pressure that is proportional to the volume of water displaced, hence, at region nearer to the surface of the balloon, the density of water would be higher according to square of distance.

This would generate an inertial acceleration that implodes around the balloon; this could illustrate the spheroidal pushed-in effect for simulating the causality for gravity.

The concept of hyperspherical pushed-in gravity could explain why matters of different mass, subjected to its inertial acceleration in the vortical flow, would be pushed toward the center of the Earth with the same acceleration.

Drop a tiny pebble (with density just slightly higher that water) into the ocean so that it would drop down (assuming there is no drift in water) to pass near the balloon. When the pebble comes near the balloon in a region of water that has higher density, it would be deflected toward the balloon in a pushed-in manner by higher density water surrounding the balloon and therefore the pebble would drop in a curved path on its way down.

If the density of a barrier of water around the balloon is compressed to be higher than the density of the pebble, and if the dropping pebble could not overcome the escape velocity of the higher density water when it got near the balloon, the pebble would be caught in a high density region of water pushing it towards the balloon and held it levitated on a pause layer of water (with higher density than the pebble) that surrounds as a nested layer of the huge balloon.

Release small air bubbles below the huge balloon, on their way up seeking least resistance paths, these air bubbles would be repelled away in curve paths by the higher density water compressed around the huge balloon.

The pushed-in effects of fluid around the huge balloon, could simulate the mechanism of gravity.

In the UVS worldview, the phenomenon of gravity is caused by aether vortical motion[uvs] to vortically repel matters within the encapsulation of a hypersphere system[uvs]. In the harmonics of aether vortical motion for nested formation of spheroidal torus vortex from the macrocosms to the microcosms, the causality of the fundamental interactions[w], are entirely compatible.

If the water pressure around the balloon is gradually reduced by an underwater whirlpool[uvs], the balloon will proportionally swell with the reduced water pressure.

The arrows around the blue hypothetical equipotential encapsulation represent the overall hyperspherical pushed-in gravity acting on the two celestial objects.

The grey region between the two celestial spheroids is the gravitational shadow region where the overall pushed-in gravitational force is reduced in a mutual blockage of the pushed-in gravitational force, whereas the smaller black arrows inside the two celestial objects, indicate their focal points.

The gravitational subtraction of the overall pushed-in gravitational force acting in the gravitational shadow region, would render the apparent effect of gravitational pulled-in forces mutually acting on each other for the two celestial objects.

These celestial objects are being pushed in from all directions at outside the gravitational shadow region, and therefore viscous matter on the celestial objects would be internally pushed out most intensely at the focal points in the shadow region; this is a delusional observation rendered in its cognitive paradox for a celestial object to appear as being pulled by the external gravitational force.

The barycenter[w] motion of two celestial objects that are precessing with sling actions would cause their viscous matter mediums to be vortically pushed out at the antipodals[w] at the opposite ends of the two celestial objects (green arrows indicate these focal points in the above image).

In equivalence, the force magnitude for the pushed-in viscous matter medium of a celestial object in the gravitational shadow region, with conservation of angular momentum it is matched by the pushed-out viscous matter medium at the antipodal of the celestial object. These effects transform a celestial object from oblate spheroid to become an ellipsoid.

A thought experiment for visualizing the pushed-in universal gravitational force of a planetary system

Matters vortically coalesce in the outer rings, will form as its satellites, which are also coalesced by the pushed-in momentum of resonated harmonics from the resonance of aether vortical motion[uvs]. And it can be conceptually visualized that these satellites rotate and revolve around the barycenter, are caused by the pushed-in force of aether vortical motion.

“All celestial objects are externally impelled to rotate and revolve
in vortical motion with resonated precession effects.” - UVS inspired -

In absolute space and time, the cosmos with an all-pervasive aether, manifests the universal gravitational force by the vortical pushed-in momentum of aether corpuscles that renders the mass effect of matter. The causality for universal gravitation as experienced by the star and its satellites, as well as all celestial objects in the physical universe, is manifested from the strong repulsive force of aether vortical motion, which is transferred from the pushed-in momentum of aether corpuscles[uvs], and thus are pushing the matters that have had displaced the aether corpuscles.

The interactions of the hyperspherical pushed-in gravity in superior and inferior conjunction

Note: The above diagrams for illustrating pushed-in gravity and the conjunctions of Solar System objects, are not to scale for size and distance.

Based on the UVS model, the Sun is coalesced by its stellar vortex, which is vortically impelled by its nested hyperspherical vortex.

In precession cycles, the Sun in barycenter motion exchanging angular momentum with all stuff encapsulated in the toroidal unisonal vortex, vortically moves in and out of the barycenter while revolving around it. From the UVS perspective, with its proposition for a hyperspherical pushed-in gravity effect, in the superior conjunction of an aligned Jupiter-Sun-Saturn, with balanced interactions of Jupiter and Saturn acting on the Sun in a hyperspherical pushed-in gravity effect for seeking their equivalence of center, the Sun would be pushed away from the barycenter of the conjunction to a nearest point from Saturn. The UVS research predicates the superior conjunction of Jupiter-Sun-Saturn would push Saturn to a nearest point from the Sun with the effect of the hyperspherical pushed-in gravity. And in the inferior conjunction, the Sun would be pushed away from the barycenter of the conjunction to a farthermost point from Saturn. The UVS research predicates the inferior conjunction of Sun-Jupiter-Saturn would push Saturn to a farthermost point from the Sun with the effect of the hyperspherical pushed-in gravity.

Reference frame of this animation is fixed on the barycenter (+) of Sun, Jupiter and Saturn. This animation illustrates the movement of the Sun in a 3-body motion. [uvs]

See the UVS topic on "Sunspot" that elaborates on how it qualitatively resolved more than a dozen mysterious phenomena of the Sun with this visual inductive resolution.

See also an externally linked topic on "Superior and inferior conjunction" that explicates on the conjunctions of celestial objects.

According to quantitative prediction of Newton's celestial mechanics[w] for the motion of three celestial objects, an anomaly exists in three-body problem[w].

The cognitive paradox of the three-body problem, is rendered with the assumption of the Sun is the center of the Solar System.

In a nutshell, and barring the gravitational effects of other Solar System objects, Newton's universal gravitation predicts that when there is an superior conjunction of Sun, Jupiter and Saturn, the combined gravity of Sun and a farthest Jupiter with its weakest gravitational force, would pull Saturn to a point farthest from the Sun.

FSaturn = G*mSun*mSaturn /rSaturn² + G*mJupiter*mSaturn /rmax²

where FSaturn is the gravitational force experienced by Saturn in the superior conjunction,
G is the gravitational constant,
mSun is the mass of the Sun,
mSaturn is the mass of Saturn,
rSaturn is the distance of Saturn from the Sun,
mJupiter is mass of Jupiter,
and rmax is the maximum distance between Saturn and Jupiter in the superior conjunction.

On the other hand, also barring the gravitational effects of other Solar System objects, in the inferior conjunction, the combined gravity of Sun and a nearest Jupiter with its strongest gravitational force, would pull Saturn to a point nearest to the Sun.

FSaturn = G*mSun*mSaturn /rSaturn² + G*mJupiter*mSaturn /rmin²

where FSaturn is the gravitational force experienced by Saturn in the inferior conjunction,
G is the gravitational constant, mSun is the mass of the Sun,
mSaturn is the mass of Saturn, rSaturn is the distance of Saturn from the Sun,
mJupiter is mass of Jupiter,
and rmin is the minimum distance between Saturn and Jupiter in the inferior conjunction.

But these predictions contradict the predictions of the mathematical construct for barycenter[w] motion of three-body problems.

For a three-body problem resolution to determine the motion of three bodies to resolve the paradoxes, mathematical patches have to be applied to make it workable for the predictions of planetary motion that are based on Newton's laws of motion[w] and universal gravitation[w]; such a mathematical construct is merely an ad hoc hypothesis[w] with mathematical fallacy[w] rendered by its intentional invalid mathematical proof.

If the Newton's universal gravitation theory is universally correct, these anomalies for three-body system would not exist.

“By denying scientific principles, one may maintain any paradox.” - Galileo Galilei

Although the mathematical construct based on Newton's celestial mechanics with the mathematical patch could pragmatically work, it is not based on its first principle, and therefore it is a formal fallacy[w] of affirming the consequent[w] to claim that this is a scientific proof of the Newton's universal gravitation theory. It suffers the argument from fallacy[w] by assuming the Sun is static and it is the center of the Solar System; it is merely a mathematical construct that does not really refer to reality.

Despite mathematics can precisely describe empirically observed natural phenomena with its validated hypothetical constructs, by itself it is not the correct tool to accurately describe the actualities of the natural phenomena.

Knowing how to quantitatively predict a phenomenon would work with its model is one thing, how does the phenomenon actually work in reality[w] could be another thing.

From the UVS perspective, the predication for the barycenter motion of a three-body system, is equivalent in principle with the pushed-in gravity hypothesis of UVS for a three-body system of three dominating Solar System objects, which are revolving in a spiral motion on a vortical accretion disk that is encapsulated in its nested bipolar torus vortex, and is vortically impelled to revolve around the Milky Way[w] galaxy.

The Sun is not the center of the Solar System.

The UVS research predicates the Sun is not the center of the Solar System.

With the observation delusion elucidated by meticulously resolve its cognitive paradox, it reveals the obscured fact that Sun is exchanging angular momentum with all other stuff in the heliosphere to revolve around a barycenter in the Solar System, is a qualitative proof that Sun is not the center of the Solar System. And the planets are actually revolving around the barycenter of the Solar System, which spirals in helical motion in the galactic system of the Milky way.

It is a fact that a planet rotates and revolves by spiraling around the barycenter of the Solar System with vortical motion while it is moving through space, and the Sun vortically revolves around its barycenter in the invariable plane[w]; a planet does not just merely revolve in elliptical orbit[w] around a static Sun. The three-body problem anomaly does not exist, it was the theory of Newton's universal gravitation with the postulations[d] of a static Sun and gravity is a pulled-in effect had suffered foundational crisis[w]. It is also a fact that Solar System objects intrinsically have induced internal energy and have precession effects like a spinning gyroscope.

“All Solar System objects vortically revolve around the barycenter of the Solar System.” - UVS inspired -

See the UVS subtopics on "The cognitive paradox fallacy in Copernican heliocentrism", "The vortically manifested planetary orbitals" that illustrates on how a planet vortically revolves and rotates around a moving Sun, and "A gyroscopic precession paradox" that illustrates a paradox in the motion of two-axis rotation.

Watch a video clip on "Earth Rotation & Revolution around a moving Sun" that illustrates with an external perception for the helical motion of Earth around a moving Sun.

This is contrary to the Newton's prediction that the combined gravity with a nearer Sun from the Earth in the conjunction will pull the Moon from its usual revolving path to a nearest point from the Earth.

The UVS research predicates the Moon will be at a farthermost away point from the Earth in the lunar opposition during the perihelion of the Earth.

And when the Earth moves toward its aphelion[w], so at its farthest distance from the Sun with a full moon also revolving in to form the lunar opposition with Sun, Moon, and Earth, the Moon from its usual revolving path will be pushed to a nearest point to the Earth by the combined vortical mass effect of the Sun and the Earth in their barycenter motion. This is contrary to the Newton's prediction that the weakened effect of gravity with a farther away Sun from the Earth in the lunar opposition will cause the Moon to be pulled lesser by the gravity of the Sun for its usual revolving path to a farthermost point away from the Earth.

The UVS research predicates the Moon will be at a nearest point to the Earth in the lunar opposition during the aphelion of the Earth.

See video clips on "NASA | South Up Moon Phase & Libration 2013" and "NASA | Moon Phase and Libration South Up 2014" that show in both years, when Earth was near perihelion in January, Moon in both events were at a farthermost distance (near apogee) from the Earth during the lunar oppositions, and when Earth was near aphelion in July, Moon in both events were at a nearest distance (near perigee) from the Earth during the lunar oppositions.

Collecting sufficient data with empirical observation for studying lunar opposition when these events occur near the perihelion of the Earth, can verify these predications of the UVS research.

See externally linked topics on "Motions of Observable Structures Ruled by Hierarchical Two-body Gravitation in the Universe" that quantitatively predict the orbits of planets with a wobbling Sun that has a composite barycenter rendered by the barycenters of its individual planets.

Based on the UVS model, a planetary system is coalesced to form by its stellar vortex, and it is impelled by its nested spheroidal torus vortex that vortically encapsulates its heliosphere.

If two planetary objects are induced to revolve each other by the stellar vortex that impels its planetary vortex, in its inertial frame of reference, the two planetary objects would revolve around each other in circular orbits centering their barycenter. From the UVS perspective, all typically manifested spheroidal torus vortices that spawn celestial objects, are precessing in their two-axis spins. Based on unisonal vortex mechanism[uvs], a planetary vortex in precession would renders the elliptical orbits with apsidal precessions for two revolving planetary objects. The barycenter of the two revolving planetary objects in their planetary vortex, therefore has the mass effect of the two planetary objects combined. A spheroid with two rotational axes.

Center of a star evolving nearer to a barycenter (+) w/ a smaller evolving planet. [s]

See the UVS topic on "The structure of galaxy" that elaborates on how the vortical motion of a galaxy is being transferred to its star systems and their planetary systems.

See also "Lagrangian", "Lagrangian points" that elaborates on the gravitational effect on a small object in five positions of a two-body system, "THE CHARGE FIELD causes LAGRANGE POINTS" that elaborates on the causality of the Lagrangian points, and "Final Demystification of the gravitational constant variation" that elaborates on the gravitation constant G is not a constant.

From the UVS perspective, the elliptical orbit of a planet is caused by the interacting vortical motion of the Sun revolving around the BOTSS[uvs]; the orbital eccentricity[w] of a planet is a mechanical function of the planet, its star, and the barycenter of its planetary system. This can coherently explain the anomaly for the "Zombie Planet's Rogue Orbit Around Star Shocks Scientists"[m], which the orbit of the exoplanet Fomalhaut b was inexplicable with Newton's celestial mechanics, and therefore needs a hypothetical exoplanet to mathematically patch the anomaly.

This can also coherently explain the NASA's Spitzer Space Telescope observation of a young binary star system surrounded by "Hula Hoops" of debris[m], which appears to be two developing stars surrounded by wobbling disks of star-formation residue; the debris rings and the binary star system revolve around the barycenter of their star system.

In actuality, a celestial object that swings around a mass center with apsidal precession[w] in elliptical orbit at its orbital inclination[w], is definitely abscribing the topology[w] of a ring torus orbital; a satellite orbit is a rendered by the vortical motion of its torus transformed nested spheroidal vortex.

The UVS research predicates the elliptical orbit of a planet with apsidal precession is rendered by its vortical interactions of its star and the barycenter of its planetary system.

See the UVS subtopic on "The primeval Earth and its moon" that elaborates on the ontology of Earth and Moon, and how their orbits are vortically transferred.

“As far as the laws of mathematics refer to reality, they are not certain,
and as far as they are certain, they do not refer to reality.” - Albert Einstein

“If the equation for a universal law of physics cannot explain reality
with its mathematical construct, it is not the reality is incorrect.” - UVS inspired -

And as a matter of fact, the Newton's law of universal gravitation[w] that descibes gravity as the pull-in effect of point mass, could not explain how it modulates the Jupiter trorans[w] and the Hildian asteroids[w] as were being demonstrated.

In the UVS worldview, these asteroids were pushed-in with the replusion force of their underlying vortical hypersphere to revolve in their ring torus orbitals that have had intrinsically manifested around the barycenter of the Solar System.

The Internet source for the inserted image or animation.