.
.The UVS inductive resolution on the spheroidal pushed-in gravity

In the UVS worldview, all celestial bodies are vortically propagating in a self-perpetuating vortical universe that is filled with an all-pervasive inviscid aetheric medium. All matters in the universe are impelled by aether vortical motion to maintain integrity for their resonated structural forms, and they are coalesced by the vortical spin fusion of aether with repulsion effect; the gravity phenomenon is merely a repulsion effect vortically manifested in a nested spheroid of the vortical universe.

With the image as illustrated on top right, visualize every line from the surface of the electrostatic spheroidal confinement to its core, is a longitudinal wave in the form of dipole quantized unisonal vortex, which has a perpetual vortical pushed-in effect towards the core.

This suggests gravity is an effect of electrostatic pressure, and it is manifested by quantized vortices to push matters inward to the core in a spheroidal confinement with their vortical repulsion force. This renders as the effect of centripetal force.

Gravitational force is manifested in the vortical universe with the perpetual vortical push-in interaction of its aether vortical motion.

In the UVS worldview, these quantized unisonal vortices are spawned by aether vortical motion with precession effects in its spheroidal confinement that wobbles in a primary two-axis spin. The vortical interactions with potential density consolidated by volumetric pressure in a spheroidal confinement, repels matter electrostatically inside a nested spheroidal unisonal vortex with reactive centrifugal force generated by the manifested quantized vortices.

The image of a plasma lamp as illustrated on bottom right with loosely packed vortical structures, illuminated by the glowing plasma filaments, is for simulating the dynamics of tightly packed quantized electromagnetic vortices that renders the effect of pushed-in gravity.

Newton's law of universal gravitation with the assumption of a static Sun resembles Coulomb's law of electrical forces in an inertial frame of reference, which is used to approximately calculate the magnitude of electrical force between two charged bodies. Both are inverse-square laws in their inertial frames of reference, in which the forces are inversely proportional to the square of the distance between the bodies.

Gravity has been thought and believed by the mainstream that it's effect is attraction, as in the attraction by point mass that pulls in toward the center of mass. This was as explained with Newton's law of universal gravitation and Newton's Principia with the action at a distance concept. Einstein's geometric gravity concept in its abstract of a curved spacetime void of an all pervasive medium, also has to be thought as a pulled-in event for the effect of gravity.

“What led me more or less directly to the special theory of relativity was the conviction that the electromotive force acting on a body in motion in a magnetic field was nothing else but an electric field.” - Albert Einstein

Based on the UVS model, the empirically observed CMB dipole in precession is coalesced by a spheroidal unisonal vortex that encapsulates the entire observable universe in its vortically manifested spheroidal volumetric pressure system.

In the UVS worldview, the phenomenon of energy in the closed system of the observable universe, is a physically manifested effect of a self-perpetual cosmic vortical motion of aether rendered by the precession effect of the universe; energy is rendered by the vortical motion of an all-pervasive aetheric medium that naturally renders the force fields in the observable universe.

The mass effect of matter is caused by aether vortical motion that renders the phenomenon of universal gravitation; aether vortical motion of the universe, is the causality of gravity.

Electrostatic potential energy, in a nested plasmatic celestial spheroid, is the phenomenon of stationary electric charge confined within electrically isolated boundary of the nested spheroid as an at-rest mass, of matter, in an inertia reference frame. Thus above so postulated is the effect of aether potential in absolute space moving in absolute motion, with vortical momentum that would vortically consolidate plasmatic viscous matter into resonated boundary state exist, and moves the matter at absolute velocity within the nested spheroid vortically. The vortical effects in unison thus manifest as the four known fundamental forces of nature in a unisonal conjoin. A nested torus-shape structure. Note: The above was co-edited with Graham Burnett. With special thanks for his inputs and contributions with his remarkable writing skills.

In an apparently stationary nested spheroidal unisonal vortex (in essence this is a nested plasmatic bubble) of a 137 nested 3-spheres with its accumulated repulsive electrostatic force of negative pressure conserved with vortical vacuum in the encapsulation, it would render an electrostatic potential density that follows approximately the principle of inverse-square law; this causes the effect of gravity. Heuristically, luminiferous aether in vortical motion weaves as an elementary form of astrophysical plasma, and it pervades throughout the entire observable universe. Its potential density conserved in its naturally weaved nested boundaries with volumetric pressure, is the causality of gravity from cosmic levels through subatomic levels. See the UVS topics on "Michelson-Morley experiment reviewed with UVS" that elaborates on the cognitive paradox fallacies of a hallmark aether experiment, and "The UVS perspective on dark matter and dark energy" that elaborates on the existence of an all-pervasive universal medium

An illustration for the formation of nested spheroidal boundaries with Moiré pattern.

In the UVS worldview, the heliosphere is a nested plasmatic sphere of the Sun; an aetheric nested spheroidal unisonal vortex.

“I agree with you Graham that gravity is NOT a pull event.” - James A. Graber (aka Jag of TOEQuest Forum) with twenty-five years into vortex research, 14th Nov 2008.

“I must in the full recognition of the fine work he does give thanks to Vincent Wee-Foo, for his platform of ponder for explanation of gravity being a push in effect.” - Graham Burnett

Do an interactive experiment to contemplate the pushed-in effect of volumetric pressure

When a suction cup pressing on a smooth surface has its air molecules mechanically squeezed out within its enclosure, the suction cup would hold firmly onto the smooth surface. This is a pushed-in effect that is rendered by the atmospheric pressure. This simple interactive experiment can be carried out in thought experiment or physically experimented, and it can demonstrate pushed-in effect for simulating the proposed pushed-in effect of gravity.

The behavior of this pushed-in effect can also be analogous to a steady water jet stream pushing an object against a solid surface inside a pool of water. In a push manner, this renders the inertial force in the flow of water to hold the object steady on the solid surface.

It can be qualitatively predicted in a simplified manner with a steady state air bubble containing carbon dioxide, oxygen and nitrogen that have molecular weight of 44.01u, 32.00u and 28.01u respectively, the heaviest carbon dioxide molecules will consolidate in cluster as a spheroid and occupy the inner core. The oxygen molecules will overlay on the carbon dioxide spheroid and the lightest nitrogen molecules will overlay on the outermost layer inside the bubble.

Perceivably, the air molecules are persistently pushed toward the core with the inertial force repelled from the equipotential surface of the spheroidal air bubble, which is formed under atmospheric pressure.

Should the smaller bubble be induced to merge into the bigger bubble, the nitrogen molecules would be mixed in the nitrogen layer of the larger bubble, while the oxygen and carbon dioxide molecules, would be pushed by the nitrogen molecules to move toward the core to reach their spheroidal molecular clusters accordingly. If a bubble of nitrogen is introduced inside the carbon dioxide spheroid at a six o'clock position as shown, it would be pushed outward by the heavier density carbon dioxide molecules, relatively rising to the surface on a easiest path, and could be observed to be moving in a vertical downward direction passing through the oxygen molecule layer, and eventually reaches the nitrogen layer.

This would generate an inertial acceleration that implodes around the balloon; this could illustrate the spheroidal pushed-in effect for simulating the causality for gravity.

See externally linked topics on "Compressibility of water (molecule)", and "Gradient" for related information.

The concept of spheroidal pushed-in gravity could explain why matters of different mass, subjected to its inertial acceleration in the vortical flow, would be pushed toward the center of the Earth with the same acceleration.

Drop a tiny pebble (with density just slightly higher that water) into the ocean so that it would drop down (assuming there is no drift in water) to pass near the balloon. When the pebble comes near the balloon in a region of water that has higher density, it would be deflected toward the balloon in a pushed-in manner by higher density water surrounding the balloon and therefore the pebble would drop in a curved path on its way down.

If the density of a barrier of water around the balloon is compressed to be higher than the density of the pebble, and if the dropping pebble could not overcome the escape velocity of the higher density water when it got near the balloon, the pebble would be caught in a high density region of water pushing it towards the balloon and held it levitated on a pause layer of water (with higher density than the pebble) that surrounds as a nested layer of the huge balloon.

Release small air bubbles below the huge balloon, on their way up seeking least resistance paths, these air bubbles would be repelled away in curve paths by the higher density water compressed around the huge balloon.

The pushed-in effects of fluid around the huge balloon, could simulate the mechanism of gravity.

In the UVS worldview, the phenomenon of gravity is caused by aether vortical motion to vortically repel matters within the encapsulation of a hypersphere system. In the harmonics of aether vortical motion for nested formation of spheroidal unisonal vortex from the macrocosms to the microcosms, the causality of the fundamental interactions, are entirely compatible.

If the water pressure around the balloon is gradually reduced by an underwater whirlpool, the balloon will proportionally swell with reduced water pressure.

See the UVS subtopics on "The UVS atomic nucleus model", "Other vortical phenomena of star" that elaborates on how red giant could be vortically manifested.

The arrows around the blue hypothetical equipotential encapsulation represent the overall spheroidal pushed-in gravity acting on the two celestial objects. The grey region between the two celestial spheroids is the gravitational shadow region where the overall pushed-in gravitational force is reduced in a mutual blockage of the pushed-in gravitational force, whereas the smaller black arrows inside the two celestial objects, indicate their focal points.

The gravitational subtraction of the overall pushed-in gravitational force acting in the gravitational shadow region, would render the apparent effect of gravitational pulled-in forces mutually acting on each other for the two celestial objects. These celestial objects are being pushed in from all directions at outside the gravitational shadow region, and therefore viscous matter on the celestial objects would be internally pushed out most intensely at the focal points in the shadow region; this is a delusively inversed illusion that is rendered in a cognitive paradox for a celestial object to appear to be pulled by an external gravitational force.

The barycenter motion of two celestial objects that orthogonally precess with sling action would cause viscous matters to be vortically pushed out at the focal points of the antipodals to act on the opposite far ends of the two celestial objects (green arrows indicate these focal points). In equivalence, the force magnitude for the pushed-in viscous matter medium of a celestial object in the gravitational shadow region, with conservation of angular momentum it is matched by the pushed-out viscous matter medium at the antipodal of the celestial object. These effects transform a celestial object from oblate spheroid to become an ellipsoid.

An ellipsoid

Based on unisonal vortex mechanism, the vortical motion of the Moon revolving around the rotating Earth in a vortical system, could explain how the tidal bulge is pushed ahead of the alignment with the Moon; the Moon is in vortical motion drag of the rotating Earth with barycenter motion in an overall vortically pushed-in gravity field.

This mechanism is similar for the vortical interactions of the Whirlpool galaxy and its satellite galaxy in their vortical motions, which are spheroidally encapsulated in their overall vortically pushed-in gravity field.

See the UVS topic on "The vortically manifested planetary orbitals" for elaboration on how all celestial objects are rotating and revolving in vortical motion.

UVS predicates that the tidal bulge of the rotating Earth is pushed ahead of its alignment with the Moon in a vortical motion drag of its underlying aetheric vortex.

A thought experiment for visualizing the pushed-in universal gravitational force of a planetary system

Matters vortically coalesce in the outer rings, will form as its satellites, which are also coalesced by the pushed-in momentum of resonated harmonics from the resonance of aether vortical motion. And it can be conceptually visualized that these satellites rotate and revolve around the barycenter, are caused by the pushed-in force of aether vortical motion; this pushed-in gravitational effect is rendered by the cyclonic gravity field effect with push momentum on aether corpuscles for dragging satellites in its vortex arms to precess in vortical motion.

“All celestial objects rotate and revolve in vortical motion with resonated precession effects.” - UVS inspired -

In a paradigm of absolute space and time with the physical universe filled with an all-pervasive aether, the apparent universal gravitational force, is manifested by the vortical pushed-in momentum of aether corpuscles that renders the mass effect of all matters. The causality for universal gravitation as experienced by the star and its satellites, as well as all celestial objects in the physical universe, is manifested from the strong repulsive force of aether vortical motion, transferred from the pushed-in momentum of aether corpuscles, which are pushing on matters that have had displaced the aether corpuscles.

The interactions of spheroidal pushed-in gravity in superior and inferior conjunction

In the superior conjunction of Sun, Jupiter and Saturn from a side view, the distance Ds with the Sun's axis pushed nearer to the barycenter (marked with red dot), Saturn would be at a nearest distance from the Sun. (Ds < Di)

Center of a star revolving nearer to a barycenter (+) w/ a smaller revolving planet.

In the inferior conjunction of Sun, Jupiter and Saturn from a side view, the distance Di with the Sun's axis pushed farther from the barycenter (marked with red dot), Saturn would be at a farthermost distance from the Sun.

Center of a star revolving farther from a barycenter (+) with a larger revolving planet.

Note: The above diagrams for illustrating the conjunctions of Solar System objects, are not to scale for size and distance.

Based on the UVS model, the Sun is coalesced by its stellar vortex, which is vortically impelled by its spheroidal unisonal vortex. In precession cycles, the Sun in barycenter motion exchanging angular momentum with all stuff encapsulated in the spheroidal unisonal vortex, and vortically moves in and out of the stellar vortex center while it revolves around it. From the UVS perspective, with its proposition for a spheroidal pushed-in gravity effect, in the superior conjunction of an aligned Jupiter-Sun-Saturn, with balanced interactions of Jupiter and Saturn acting on the Sun in a spheroidal pushed-in gravity effect for seeking their equivalence of center, the Sun would be pushed away from the barycenter of the conjunction to a nearest point from Saturn. UVS predicates that the superior conjunction of Jupiter-Sun-Saturn would push Saturn to a nearest point from the Sun with the effect of spheroidal pushed-in gravity. And in the inferior conjunction, the Sun would be pushed away from the barycenter of the conjunction to a farthermost point from Saturn. UVS predicates the inferior conjunction of Sun-Jupiter-Saturn would push Saturn to a farthermost point from the Sun with the effect of spheroidal pushed-in gravity.

Reference frame of this animation is fixed on the barycenter (+) of Sun, Jupiter and Saturn. This animation is merely for illustration only.

See the UVS topic on "Sunspot" that elaborates on how it qualitatively resolved more than a dozen mysterious phenomena of the Sun with this inductive resolution.

See also an externally linked topic on "Superior and inferior conjunction" for its elaboration.

According to quantitative prediction of Newton's celestial mechanics for the motion of three celestial objects, an anomaly exists in three-body problem.

The cognitive paradox of the three-body problem, is rendered with the assumption of the Sun is the center of the Solar System.

In a nutshell, and barring the gravitational effects of other Solar System objects, Newton's universal gravitation predicts that when there is an superior conjunction of Sun, Jupiter and Saturn, the combined gravity of Sun and a farthest Jupiter with its weakest gravitational force, would pull Saturn to a point farthest from the Sun.

FSaturn = G*mSun*mSaturn /rSaturn² + G*mJupiter*mSaturn /rmax²

where FSaturn is the gravitational force experienced by Saturn in the superior conjunction,
G is the gravitational constant,
mSun is the mass of the Sun,
mSaturn is the mass of Saturn,
rSaturn is the distance of Saturn from the Sun,
mJupiter is mass of Jupiter,
and rmax is the maximum distance between Saturn and Jupiter in the superior conjunction.

On the other hand, also barring the gravitational effects of other Solar System objects, in the inferior conjunction, the combined gravity of Sun and a nearest Jupiter with its strongest gravitational force, would pull Saturn to a point nearest to the Sun.

FSaturn = G*mSun*mSaturn /rSaturn² + G*mJupiter*mSaturn /rmin²

where FSaturn is the gravitational force experienced by Saturn in the inferior conjunction,
G is the gravitational constant, mSun is the mass of the Sun,
mSaturn is the mass of Saturn, rSaturn is the distance of Saturn from the Sun,
mJupiter is mass of Jupiter,
and rmin is the minimum distance between Saturn and Jupiter in the inferior conjunction.

But these predictions contradict the predictions of the mathematical construct for barycenter motion of three-body problems.

For a three-body problem resolution to determine the motion of three bodies to resolve the paradoxes, mathematical patches have to be applied to make it workable for the predictions of planetary motion that are based on Newton's laws of motion and universal gravitation; such a mathematical construct is merely an ad hoc hypothesis with mathematical fallacy rendered by its intentional invalid mathematical proof.

If the Newton's universal gravitation theory is universally correct, these anomalies for three-body system would not exist.

“By denying scientific principles, one may maintain any paradox.” - Galileo Galilei

Although the mathematical construct based on Newton's celestial mechanics with the mathematical patch could pragmatically work, it is not based on its first principle, and therefore it is a formal fallacy of affirming the consequent to claim that this is a scientific proof of the Newton's universal gravitation theory, which suffers an argument from fallacy by assuming the Sun is static and it is the center of the Solar System.

Despite mathematics can precisely describe empirically observed natural phenomena with its validated hypothetical constructs, by itself it is not the correct tool to accurately describe the actualities of the natural phenomena.

Knowing how to quantitatively predict a phenomenon would work with its model is one thing, how does the phenomenon actually work in reality could be another thing.

From the UVS perspective, the predications for the barycenter motion of a three-body system, is equivalent in principle with the pushed-in gravity hypothesis of UVS for a three-body system of three dominating Solar System objects, which are revolving in spiral motion on a vortical accretion disk that is encapsulated in its nested bipolar spheroidal unisonal vortex, and is vortically impelled to revolve around the Milky Way galaxy.

The Sun is not the center of the Solar System.

With the observation delusion elucidated by meticulously resolve its cognitive paradox, it reveals the obscured fact that Sun is exchanging angular momentum with all other stuff in the heliosphere to revolve around a barycenter in the Solar System, is a qualitative proof that Sun is not the center of the Solar System.

UVS predicates that the Sun is not the center of the Solar System.

It is a fact that a planet rotates and revolves by spiraling around a moving Sun with vortical motion while moving through space, and the Sun vortically revolves around its barycenter in the invariable plane; a planet does not just merely revolve in elliptical orbit around a static Sun. The three-body problem anomaly does not exist, it was the theory of Newton's universal gravitation with the postulations of a static Sun and gravity is a pulled-in effect had suffered foundational crisis. It is also a fact that Solar System objects intrinsically have induced internal energy and have precession effects like a spinning gyroscope.

“All Solar System objects vortically revolve around the barycenter of the Solar System.” - UVS inspired -

See the UVS subtopics on "The cognitive paradox fallacy in Copernican heliocentrism", "The vortically manifested planetary orbitals" that illustrates on how a planet vortically revolves and rotates around a moving Sun, and "A gyroscopic precession paradox" that illustrates a paradox in the motion of orthogonal rotation.

Watch a video clip on "Earth Rotation & Revolution around a moving Sun" that illustrates with an external perception for the helical motion of Earth around a moving Sun.

And when the Earth moves toward its aphelion, so at its farthest distance from the Sun with a full moon also revolving in to form the lunar opposition with Sun, Moon, and Earth, the Moon from its usual revolving path will be pushed to a nearest point to the Earth by the combined vortical mass effect of the Sun and the Earth in their barycenter motion. This is contrary to the Newton's prediction that the weakened effect of gravity with a farther away Sun from the Earth in the lunar opposition will cause the Moon to be pulled lesser by the gravity of the Sun for its usual revolving path to a farthermost point away from the Earth.

UVS predicates that the Moon will be at a nearest point to the Earth in the lunar opposition during the aphelion of the Earth.

See video clips on "NASA | South Up Moon Phase & Libration 2013" and "NASA | Moon Phase and Libration South Up 2014" that show in both years, when Earth was near perihelion in January, Moon in both events were at a farthermost distance (near apogee) from the Earth during the lunar oppositions, and when Earth was near aphelion in July, Moon in both events were at a nearest distance (near perigee) from the Earth during the lunar oppositions.

Collecting sufficient data with empirical observation for studying lunar opposition when these events occur near the perihelion of the Earth, can verify these predications of the UVS research.

See externally linked topics on "Motions of Observable Structures Ruled by Hierarchical Two-body Gravitation in the Universe" that quantitatively predict the orbits of planets with a wobbling Sun that has a composite barycenter rendered by the barycenters of its individual planets.

Based on the UVS model, a planetary system is coalesced by its stellar vortex, and it is impelled by its nested spheroidal unisonal vortex that vortically encapsulates its heliosphere. If two celestial objects are induced to revolve each other by the stellar vortex that is impelled by its spheroidal unisonal vortex and it is not precessing, in its inertial frame of reference, the two celestial objects would revolve around each other in a barycenter motion with circular orbits centering their barycenter. From the UVS perspective, all typically manifested spheroidal unisonal vortices in nature are primarily precessing in two-axis spin, which is reflected by the empirical observations that all revolving celestial objects are precessing. Based on unisonal vortex mechanism, a stellar vortex in precession would therefore be transformed to become a dual-core stellar vortex with the precession effect of its spheroidal unisonal vortex; this effect renders the elliptical orbit with apsidal motion on two barycenter focal points for any revolving celestial object. A spheroid with two rotational axes

Center of a star evolving nearer to a barycenter (+) w/ a smaller evolving planet.

See the UVS topic on "The structure of galaxy" that elaborates on how the vortical motion of a galaxy is being transferred to its star systems and their planetary systems.

See also "Lagrangian", "Lagrangian points" that elaborates on the gravitational effect on a small object in five positions of a two-body system, "THE CHARGE FIELD causes LAGRANGE POINTS" that elaborates on the causality of the Lagrangian points, and "Final Demystification of the gravitational constant variation" that elaborates on the gravitation constant G is not a constant.

From the UVS perspective, the elliptical orbit of a planet is caused by the interacting vortical motion of the Sun revolving around the BOTSS; the orbital eccentricity of a planet is a mechanical function of the planet, its star, and the barycenter of its planetary system. This can coherently explain the anomaly for the "Zombie Planet's Rogue Orbit Around Star Shocks Scientists", which the orbit of the exoplanet Fomalhaut b was inexplicable with Newton's celestial mechanics, and therefore needs a hypothetical exoplanet to mathematically patch the anomaly.

This can also coherently explain the NASA's Spitzer Space Telescope observation of a young binary star system surrounded by "Hula Hoops" of debris, which appears to be two developing stars surrounded by wobbling disks of star-formation residue; the debris rings and the binary star system revolve around the barycenter of their star system.

See the UVS subtopic on "The primeval Earth and its moon" that elaborates on the ontology of Earth and Moon, and how their orbits are vortically transferred.

From the UVS perspective, the BOTSS is virtually the balanced mass center of the entire planetary system; a planet in motion dynamically interacts with its vortically wobbling star, as well as all other objects of its planetary system. In vortical resonance. The planet therefore appears to be precessing around its star in elliptical orbit with apsidal motion in a frame of reference; this is the causality for the apsidal precession of a planet in the inertia reference frame of the Solar System.

UVS predicates that the elliptical orbit of a planet with apsidal precession is rendered by its vortical interactions of its star and the barycenter of its planetary system.

“As far as the laws of mathematics refer to reality, they are not certain,
and as far as they are certain, they do not refer to reality.” - Albert Einstein

“If the equation for a universal law of physics cannot explain a reality
with its mathematical construct, it is not the reality is incorrect.” - UVS inspired -