Home
Preface
Overviews
Paradoxical effect
Revolutionary discoveries
UVS worldview
UVS model
UVS inspirations
Forum
Contact

.
.
Universal Vortical Singularity enlightenment on the spheroidal pushed-in gravity

In the UVS worldview, all celestial bodies are vortically propagating in a self-perpetuating vortical universe that is filled with an all-pervasive inviscid medium. The vortical effect of the vortical universe manifests a nested spheroidal force field, and with reactive centrifugal force generated in the spheroidal encapsulations with pushed-in momentum, it thus renders the effect of gravity for all matters.

All matters in the universe are impelled by aether vortical motion to maintain integrity for their resonated structural forms, and they are coalesced by the vortical spin fusion of aether with repulsion effect; gravity is merely a vortical repulsion effect in a nested spheroid of the vortical universe.

Note: This abstract of UVS was inferred in the UVS worldview with the explication of its aether-based concepts. As a conceptual framework of UVS, in the discipline of epistemology with its empiricism, it elucidates empirical observations of natural phenomena with hypotheses that are conceived with the UVS model.

The mass effect of matter is caused by aether vortical motion
that renders the phenomenon of universal gravitation.
- UVS inspired
-

See UVS topics on "Vortical gravitational singularity" that elaborates on the higher order virtual barycenters of the universe, "Scientific evidence and proofs for aether does physically exist", and "The dipole anisotropy pattern of CMBR" that evidently illustrates an empirically observed nested spheroidal unisonal vortex in the observable universe.


The vortical core-seeking force renders the binding effect of Spheroidal pushed-in gravitational field

From the UVS perspective, the effect of gravity, experienced as an inertial force, and has been thought to be a pulled-in effect towards the core of an object, is rendered by quantized electromagnetic vortices in a paradigm of nested spheroidal unisonal vortex with the effects of its repelling electrostatic force.

With the image as illustrated on top right, visualize every line from the surface of the electrostatic spheroidal confinement to its core, is a longitudinal wave in the form of dipole quantized unisonal vortex, which has a perpetual vortical pushed-in effect towards the core.

This suggests gravity is an effect of electrostatic pressure, and it is manifested by quantized vortices to push matters inward to the core in a spheroidal confinement with their vortical repulsion force.

In the UVS worldview, these quantized unisonal vortices are spawned by aether vortical motion with precession effects in its spheroidal confinement that wobbles in a primary two-axis spin. The vortical interactions with potential density consolidated by volumetric pressure in a spheroidal confinement, repels matter electrostatically inside a nested spheroidal unisonal vortex with reactive centrifugal force generated by the manifested quantized vortices.

The image of a plasma lamp as illustrated on bottom right with loosely packed vortical structures, illuminated by the glowing plasma filaments, is for simulating the dynamics of tightly packed quantized electromagnetic vortices that renders the effect of pushed-in gravity.


Quantized vortices
in a spheroidal
confinement.


Plasma lamp

* With credits to James Aaron Nicholson for his theory on "Tiny Bits Part I on Gravity" that indirectly suggests gravity is a push effect instead of pull effect. This ingenious idea on gravity he mulled for more than forty years, elucidates the delusion of pulled-in gravity in the UVS worldview.

UVS predicates that gravity is vortically rendered by quantized electromagnetic vortices. With credits to James Aaron Nicholson.

UVS predicates that gravity is a manifestation of vortical core-seeking motion and it vortically pushes matters inward to the mass center. Inspired by Tiny Bits Part I on Gravity.

See a UVS topic on "A perpetual motion experiment" that experimentally proves gravity is a vortical pushed-in repulsive force; this is a qualitative proof for gravity is a manifestation of vortical core-seeking force that vortically pushes matters inward to the mass center.

From the UVS perspective, the superpositioning of the longitudinal waves of aether in the form of dipole quantized unisonal vortices that push toward the core of an object, render the effect of inverse-square law for its gravitational force.

Newton's law of universal gravitation with the assumption of a static Sun resembles Coulomb's law of electrical forces in an inertial frame of reference, which is used to approximately calculate the magnitude of electrical force between two charged bodies. Both are inverse-square laws in their inertial frames of reference, in which the forces are inversely proportional to the square of the distance between the bodies.

The inverse-square law equations governing the three different force fields are:   
Electrostatic Force F = KQ1Q2/ K=1/4pieo, Q= charge, R = distance  
Gravitational Force F = GM1M2/ G= gravitational constant, M= mass, R = distance  
Magnetic Force F = UM1M2/ U=u/4pio, M= magnetic monopoles strength, R = distance
Excerpts from Blaze Labs Research.

Gravity has been thought and believed by the mainstream that it's effect is attraction, as in the attraction by point mass that pulls in toward the center of mass. This was as explained with Newton's law of universal gravitation and Newton's Principia with the action at a distance concept. Einstein's geometric gravity concept in its abstract of a curved spacetime void of an all pervasive medium, also has to be thought as a pulled-in event for the effect of gravity.


Diagram for inverse-square law (Intensity = 1/d²)

 

What led me more or less directly to the special theory of relativity was the conviction that the electromotive force acting on a body in motion in a magnetic field was nothing else but an electric field. - Albert Einstein

 

The causality of gravity

Based on the UVS model, the empirically observed CMBR dipole in precession is undulated by a spheroidal unisonal vortex that encapsulates the entire observable universe in its vortically manifested spheroidal volumetric pressure system.

In the UVS worldview, the phenomenon of energy in the closed system of the observable universe, is a physically manifested effect of a self-perpetual cosmic vortical motion of aether rendered by the precession effect of the universe; energy is rendered by the vortical motion of an all-pervasive aetheric medium that naturally renders the force fields in the observable universe.

The mass effect of matter is caused by aether vortical motion that renders the phenomenon of universal gravitation; aether vortical motion of the universe, is the causality of gravity.

Gravitational force is a manifestation of aether vortical motion with its repulsion effect. Gravity is a vortical repulsion effect.

Aether vortical motion vortically pushes out all sources of electromagnetic radiation
in the universe, and causes the spheroidal pushed-in effect as universal gravitation
in its vortically conceived spheroidal encapsulation.
- UVS inspired -

See UVS topics on "The nested inviscid hypersphere of a 3-sphere system with 137 primary harmonics of nested vortical spheroid", and "UVS reviews the GR concepts of gravity" for further elaborates.

See externally linked topics on "Tesla's Dynamic Theory of Gravity" that explains the relation between gravitation and electromagnetic force as a unified field theory (a model over matter, the aether, and energy), "The mechanical explanations of gravitation", "Vortex dynamics" of Hermann von Helmholtz, "What is the difference between 'matter' and 'mass'?", and "Le Sage's theory of gravitation" that elaborates on push gravity.

All mass is interaction. - Richard Feynman

Electrostatic potential energy, in a nested plasmatic celestial spheroid, is the phenomenon of stationary electric charge confined within electrically isolated boundary of the nested spheroid as an at-rest mass, of matter, in an inertia reference frame.

Thus above so postulated is the effect of aether potential in absolute space moving in absolute motion, with vortical momentum that would vortically consolidate plasmatic viscous matter into resonated boundary state exist, and moves the matter at absolute velocity within the nested spheroid vortically.

The vortical effects in unison thus manifest as the four known fundamental forces of nature in a unisonal conjoin.

A nested torus-shape structure.

Note: The above was co-edited with Graham Burnett. With special thanks for his inputs and contributions with his remarkable writing skills.
 

In an apparently stationary nested spheroidal unisonal vortex (in essence this is a nested plasmatic bubble) of a 137-sphere with its accumulated repulsive electrostatic force of negative pressure conserved with vortical vacuum in the encapsulation, it would render an electrostatic potential density that follows approximately the principle of inverse-square law; this causes the effect of gravity.

Heuristically, luminiferous aether in vortical motion weaves as an elementary form of astrophysical plasma, and it pervades throughout the entire observable universe. Its potential density conserved in its naturally weaved nested boundaries with volumetric pressure, is the causality of gravity from cosmic levels through subatomic levels.

See UVS topics on "Michelson-Morley experiment reviewed with UVS" that elaborates on the cognitive paradox fallacies of a hallmark aether experiment, and "An all-pervasive inviscid medium that pervades the observable universe" that elaborates on the existence of an all-pervasive universal medium

An illustration for the formation of nested spheroidal boundaries with Moiré pattern.

In the UVS worldview, the heliosphere is a nested plasmatic sphere of the Sun; a nested plasmatic bubble, or a nested spheroidal unisonal vortex.


I agree with you Graham that gravity is NOT a pull event.” - James A. Graber (aka Jag of TOEQuest Forum) with twenty-five years into vortex research, 14th Nov 2008.

I must in the full recognition of the fine work he does give thanks to Vincent Wee-Foo, for his platform of ponder for explanation of gravity being a push in effect.- Graham Burnett

"Even though electrostatically induced forces seem to be rather weak, the electrostatic force between e.g. an electron and a proton, that together make up a hydrogen atom, is about 36 orders of magnitude stronger than the gravitational force acting between them." - Excerpt from Wikipedia on "Electrostatics".

In the UVS worldview, in its vortical paradigm, the effects of electrostatic force that occurs within a nested galactic spheroidal unisonal vortex, and thus withheld the structure of a galaxy, is similar to subatomic scenario that this electrostatic force is much stronger than gravitational force. Gravitational force in a local reference frame is an electrostatic pushed-in effect. Holistically, in another reference frame of a grander vortical motion, it is an accumulated electromagnetic pushed-in effect of a 137-sphere vortical universe.

UVS predicates that the geometric gravitational force for all celestial objects in the universe is caused by the potential density of an aetheric medium with its volumetric pressure.

UVS predicates that gravity is manifested by electrostatic pressure repelling inside nested spheroidal unisonal vortex to push-in matters vortically toward the core.

See UVS topics on "A star is vortically formed within a larger vortical system that impels its galaxy" that illustrates with empirical evidence to assert that gravity is a spheroidal pushed-in inertial force, and "Vortical elementary and subatomic particles" that elaborates on the fundamental forces of nature.

Note: The electrostatic repelling force of electric charge is billions of times stronger than gravity, see externally linked topics on "Electrostatics" by Dr. Dave Hopper, and planetary gravity in "The Electro-Magnetic Radiation Pressure (EMRP) Gravity Theory" from Blaze Labs Research.

Air could be removed inside a sealed container with an atmospheric vacuum pump, this would create a phenomenon of vacuum that is void of air, as such atmospheric pressure will be crushing on the container. Nonetheless, energy density is still detectable in this vacuum.

From the UVS perspective, this is supposedly caused by an all-pervasive universal medium that renders the effects of gravity; this is not an absolute state of vacuum. This aetheric medium with potential density weakly interacts with the matter that makes up the container, mostly flowing through it like the physical boundary of the container is quite hollow to this aetheric medium. The inertial force of this vortical repulsion effect, would cause the container and any physical object contained inside it, to be pushed by this aetheric medium to flow towards the Earth's center in its momentum culmination process with acceleration. This accelerated flow-in perpetual vortical motion renders the phenomenon of gravity we all are experiencing.

 

Do an interactive experiment to contemplate a pushed-in effect that is caused by volumetric pressure.

When a suction cup pressing on a smooth surface has its air molecules mechanically squeezed out within its enclosure, the suction cup would hold firmly onto the smooth surface. This is a pushed-in effect that is rendered by the atmospheric pressure. This simple interactive experiment can be carried out in thought experiment or physically experimented, and it can demonstrate pushed-in effect for simulating the proposed pushed-in effect of gravity.

The behavior of this pushed-in effect can also be analogous to a steady water jet stream pushing an object against a solid surface inside a pool of water. In a push manner, this renders the inertial force in the flow of water to hold the object steady on the solid surface.




Suction cup

 

Soap bubble metaphor

The pushed-in gravity concept can also be illustrated with a soap bubble metaphor, although this can be quite easy to understand, it nevertheless is very paradoxical and counterintuitive.

For a freely suspended air bubble with potential density rendered by spheroidal volumetric pressure, which is formed in atmospheric viscous matter with an outer skin of liquid, the repelling force of air pressure by inverse-square law will push and consolidate those higher density air molecules inside the bubble toward the core.

It can be qualitatively predicted in a simplified manner with a steady state air bubble containing carbon dioxide, oxygen and nitrogen that have molecular weight of 44.01u, 32.00u and 28.01u respectively, the heaviest carbon dioxide molecules will consolidate in cluster as a spheroid and occupy the inner core. The oxygen molecules will overlay on the carbon dioxide spheroid and the lightest nitrogen molecules will overlay on the outermost layer inside the bubble.

Perceivably, the air molecules are persistently pushed toward the core with the inertial force repelled from the equipotential surface of the spheroidal air bubble, which is formed under atmospheric pressure.

Should the smaller bubble be induced to merge into the bigger bubble, the nitrogen molecules would be mixed in the nitrogen layer of the larger bubble, while the oxygen and carbon dioxide molecules, would be pushed by the nitrogen molecules to move toward the core to reach their spheroidal molecular clusters accordingly. If a bubble of nitrogen is introduced inside the carbon dioxide spheroid at a six o'clock position as shown, it would be pushed outward by the heavier density carbon dioxide molecules, relatively rising to the surface on a easiest path, and could be observed to be moving in a vertical downward direction passing through the oxygen molecule layer, and eventually reaches the nitrogen layer.

Diagram of a steady state uspended air bubble with a smaller bubble on outer skin.

This soap bubble metaphor is just for analogy purposes, there are many details involved that need to be addressed, such as the extend of how much the carbon dioxide molecules would sink in the soap bubble under the effect of gravity. Nevertheless, the primary focus of this metaphor is on qualitative analysis for emulating the fundamental working principles of gravity as a pushed-in force imploding towards a zero-point.

See externally linked topics on "Fluid statics", "Energy density", and "Casimir effect".

An experiment could be carried out in space under weightlessness circumstances in room temperature by spinning the soap bubble in a spheroidal confinement to emulate the dynamics of pushed-in gravity for celestial bodies. The inner layer of soap bubble would become a nested oblate spheroid in the spin. Then induce orthogonal rotation to the soap bubble, and a dipole free vortex pair in the axis of spin could start to form.

At a certain angular speed when a clump of oxygen molecules with resonated centrifugal force of two-axis spin overcomes its cohesive force from the oxygen layer, it will breakaway and escape from the main layer to naturally form a smaller oxygen spheroid that has the most efficient geometric shape. This smaller oxygen spheroid can find an equipotential density region somewhere in the nitrogen layer, its distance from the core would proportionally depend on the induced centrifugal force within the spheroidal volumetric pressure that pushes in heavier matters; the spin that pushes the smaller oxygen spheroid away from the center by the centrifugal force, would be held back by centripetal force with pressure in the nitrogen layer that pushes heavier matters toward the center. And persistently impelled by the torque-induced precession in a two-axis spin, the smaller oxygen spheroid would perpetually revolve in an elliptic orbit around the larger oxygen spheroid in its plane of rotation.

I have often made the hypothesis that ultimately physics will not require a mathematical statement,
that in the end the machinery will be revealed and the laws will turn out to be simple.
- Richard Fenyman

Aether vortical motion is the omnipotent physical law of the observable universe.” - UVS inspired -

See UVS topics on "The unisonal vortex mechanism", and "Orbits of natural satellites" that elaborates on the vortical mechanism that impels all celestial objects to rotate and revolve in vortical motion.

See also video clips "Waves in a Large Free Sphere of Water", and "Surface tension of water in microgravity" for some interesting NASA experiments done in the International Space station.

 

A thought experiment to simulate spheroidal pushed-in gravity with huge a balloon held in deep ocean

To conceptually simulate the effect of gravity, do a thought experiment to imagine a huge balloon filled with air (lets say its size is one thousand kilometer) is held in deep ocean, the volume of air within the balloon is encapsulated in an ocean of water would therefore be subjected to tremendous pressure. The air in the balloon displaces a volume of water would push outwardly in almost isotropy (barring that water pressure is relative to its depth would cause variation in uniformity of the isotropy effect) is met with an with an equal opposite force of the water mass in ocean that pushes inward around the balloon in its spheroidal confinement with the pressure in ocean.

Water around pushes against the balloon would be compacted to have density gradient following the inverse-square law of water pressure that is proportional to the volume of water displaced, hence, at region nearer to the surface of the balloon, the density of water would be higher according to square of distance.


A balloon

This would generate an inertial acceleration that implodes around the balloon; this could illustrate the spheroidal pushed-in effect for simulating the causality for gravity.

See externally linked topics on "Compressibility of water (molecule)", and "Gradient" for related information.

The concept of spheroidal pushed-in gravity could explain why matters of different mass, subjected to its inertial acceleration in the vortical flow, would be pushed toward the center of the Earth with the same acceleration.

Drop a tiny pebble (with density just slightly higher that water) into the ocean so that it would drop down (assuming there is no drift in water) to pass near the balloon. When the pebble comes near the balloon in a region of water that has higher density, it would be deflected toward the balloon in a pushed-in manner by higher density water surrounding the balloon and therefore the pebble would drop in a curved path on its way down.

If the density of a barrier of water around the balloon is compressed to be higher than the density of the pebble, and if the dropping pebble could not overcome the escape velocity of the higher density water when it got near the balloon, the pebble would be caught in a high density region of water pushing it towards the balloon and held it levitated on a pause layer of water (with higher density than the pebble) that surrounds as a nested layer of the huge balloon.

Release small air bubbles below the huge balloon, on their way up seeking least resistance paths, these air bubbles would be repelled away in curve paths by the higher density water compressed around the huge balloon.

The pushed-in effects of fluid around the huge balloon, could simulate the mechanism of gravity.

In the UVS worldview, the phenomenon of gravity is caused by aether vortical motion to vortically repel matters within the encapsulation of an Ultra Cosmic Spheroid. In the harmonics of aether vortical motion for nested formation of spheroidal unisonal vortex from the macrocosms to the microcosms, the causality of the fundamental interactions, are entirely compatible.

If the water pressure around the balloon is gradually reduced by an underwater whirlpool, the balloon will proportionally swell with reduced water pressure.

See a UVS subtopic on "The UVS atomic nucleus model", "Other vortical phenomena of star" that elaborates on how red giant could be vortically manifested.

 

The causality of tidal force - A paradoxical mutual pushed-in gravity effect

Based on the UVS model, a nested spheroidal unisonal vortex of the universe undulates to form the CMBR dipole, and this manifests the effect of universal gravity. And this renders the spheroidal pushed-in gravity for all its vortically manifest physical structures.

The spheroidal pushed-in gravity that acts on two celestial objects would be mutually perturbed in a region to render the paradoxical effect of gravitational pull on each other, the below image on right illustrates on how the overall gravitational pushed-in force in a gravitational shadow region of the two celestial objects, could render the apparent effect of a gravitational pulled-in force acting on each other.

The arrows around the blue hypothetical equipotential encapsulation represent the overall spheroidal pushed-in gravity acting on the two celestial objects. The grey region between the two celestial spheroids is the gravitational shadow region where the overall pushed-in gravitational force is reduced in a mutual blockage of the pushed-in gravitational force, whereas the smaller black arrows inside the two celestial objects, indicate their focal points.

The gravitational subtraction of the overall pushed-in gravitational force acting in the gravitational shadow region, would render the apparent effect of gravitational pulled-in forces mutually acting on each other for the two celestial objects. These celestial objects are being pushed in from all directions at outside the gravitational shadow region, and therefore viscous matter on the celestial objects would be internally pushed out most intensely at the focal points in the shadow region; this is a delusively inversed illusion that is rendered in a cognitive paradox for a celestial object to appear to be pulled by an external gravitational force.

The barycenter motion of two celestial objects that orthogonally precess with sling action would cause viscous matters to be vortically pushed out at the focal points of the antipodals to act on the opposite far ends of the two celestial objects (green arrows indicate these focal points).

In equivalence, the force magnitude for the pushed-in viscous matter medium of a celestial object in the gravitational shadow region, with conservation of angular momentum it is matched by the pushed-out viscous matter medium at the antipodal of the celestial object. These effects transform a celestial object from oblate spheroid to become an ellipsoid.


An ellipsoid

A simplified illustration for pushed-in gravity acting on two celestial objects that render the apparent effect of a pulled-in gravity acting on each other.

Tidal force field acting on a celestial object

UVS predicates that tidal force is vortically caused by a universal spheroidal pushed-in gravity with the reactive push momentum in its barycenter motion.

This vortical pushed-in effect could coherently explain the spiral magnetotail phenomenon of a celestial object, and these could be empirically observed in planets, planetary nebulae, and binary star systems, such as the magnetotail of Earth, spiral plasma tails of Cat's Eye Nebula, and binary star system SS443.

The gravitational pushed-in effect acting on two elastic celestial objects with their barycenter motion could comprehensive and coherently explain the two tidal bulges on Earth, and how an elastic celestial spheroid could become ellipsoid in a vortical force field.

A rotating and revolving elastic ellipsoidal celestial object that also wobbles, could be transformed into a dual-core elongated toroid; a spheroidal unisonal vortex.

The pushed-in gravity mechanism could resolve the cognitive paradox that mysteriously render the two tidal bulges on an elastic celestial spheroid; spheroidal pushed-in gravity with barycenter motion is the causality for tidal force. This universal mechanism is also applicable for all atomic, subatomic and fundamental particles in the microcosms.

See a video clip on "SkyMarvels™ EARTH-MOON BARYCENTER" that illustrates the barycenter motion of Earth with its revolving moon.

Based on unisonal vortex mechanism, the vortical motion of the Moon revolving around the rotating Earth in a vortical system, could explain how the tidal bulge is pushed ahead of the alignment with the Moon; the Moon is in vortical motion drag of the rotating Earth with barycenter motion in an overall vortically pushed-in gravity field.

This mechanism is similar for the vortical interactions of the Whirlpool galaxy and its satellite galaxy in their vortical motions, which are spheroidally encapsulated in their overall vortically pushed-in gravity field.

See UVS topics on "Cyclonic gravity field effect", and "The orbit of natural satellite" for elaboration on how all celestial objects are rotating and revolving in vortical motion.

UVS predicates that the tidal bulge of the rotating Earth is pushed ahead of its alignment with the Moon in a vortical motion drag of its underlying aetheric vortex.

A diagram of the Earth-Moon system showing how the tidal bulge is pushed ahead by the Earth's rotation.
Whirlpool galaxy with its smaller satellite galaxy.

 

A thought experiment for visualizing the pushed-in universal gravitational force of a planetary system

The illustrated 2D animation for unisonal vortex in the top view of a spheroidal unisonal vortex, can be used to contemplate on the undulating vortical dynamic of a planetary system.

From the UVS perspective, in a resonance of aether vortical motion that manifests a typical planetary system, such as our Solar System, the manifested matters vortically coalesce into the inner ring with sufficient energy, would form the lit up star with the vortical pushed-in momentum of aether corpuscles, and therefore the vortically manifested star wobbles around the vortically manifested barycenter of the resonated unisonal vortex.


Unisonal vortex
in 2D animation

Matters vortically coalesce in the outer rings, will form as its satellites, which are also coalesced by the pushed-in momentum of resonated harmonics from the resonance of aether vortical motion. And it can be conceptually visualized that these satellites rotate and revolve around the barycenter, are caused by the pushed-in force of aether vortical motion; this pushed-in gravitational effect is rendered by the cyclonic gravity field effect with push momentum on aether corpuscles for dragging satellites in its vortex arms to precess in vortical motion.

All celestial objects rotate and revolve in vortical motion with resonated precession effects.- UVS inspired -

In a paradigm of absolute space and time with the physical universe filled with an all-pervasive aether, the apparent universal gravitational force, is manifested by the vortical pushed-in momentum of aether corpuscles that renders the mass effect of all matters. The causality for universal gravitation as experienced by the star and its satellites, as well as all celestial objects in the physical universe, is manifested from the strong repulsive force of aether vortical motion, transferred from the pushed-in momentum of aether corpuscles, which are pushing on matters that have had displaced the aether corpuscles.

 

The interactions of spheroidal pushed-in gravity in superior and inferior conjunction

In the superior conjunction of Sun, Jupiter and Saturn from a side view, the distance Ds with the Sun's axis pushed nearer to the barycenter (marked with red dot), Saturn would be at a nearest distance from the Sun. (Ds < Di)


Center of a star revolving nearer to a barycenter (+) w/ a smaller revolving planet.


In the inferior conjunction of Sun, Jupiter and Saturn from a side view, the distance Di with the Sun's axis pushed farther from the barycenter (marked with red dot), Saturn would be at a farthermost distance from the Sun.


Center of a star revolving
farther from a barycenter
(+) with a larger revolving planet.

Note: The above diagrams for illustrating the conjunctions of Solar System objects, are not to scale for size and distance.

Based on the UVS model, Sun is undulated by its stellar vortex, which is vortically impelled by its spheroidal unisonal vortex. In precession cycles, the Sun in barycenter motion exchanging angular momentum with all stuff encapsulated in the spheroidal unisonal vortex, and vortically moves in and out of the stellar vortex center while it revolves around it.

From the UVS perspective, with its proposition for a spheroidal pushed-in gravity effect, in the superior conjunction of an aligned Jupiter-Sun-Saturn, with balanced interactions of Jupiter and Saturn acting on the Sun in a spheroidal pushed-in gravity effect for seeking their equivalence of center, the Sun would be pushed away from the barycenter of the conjunction to a nearest point from Saturn. And in the inferior conjunction, the Sun would be pushed away from the barycenter of the conjunction to a farthermost point from Saturn.

The movement of the Sun from the barycenter of its 3-body system, renders the cognitive paradox with the assumption of the Sun is the center of the Solar System. Heuristically, these qualitative predictions of UVS can resolve a mystery of sunspot for the empirically observed Maunder Minimum phenomenon.

See a UVS topic on "Sunspot" that elaborates on how it qualitatively resolved more than twenty mysterious phenomena of the Sun with this resolution, which also elucidates that BOTSS is the center of the Solar System.

Reference frame of this animation is fixed on the barycenter (+) of Sun, Jupiter and Saturn.
This animation is merely for illustration only.

See also an externally linked topic on "Superior and inferior conjunction" for its elaboration.

UVS predicates that the superior conjunction of Jupiter-Sun-Saturn would push Saturn to a nearest point from the Sun with the effect of spheroidal pushed-in gravity.

UVS predicates the inferior conjunction of Sun-Jupiter-Saturn would push Saturn to a farthermost point from the Sun with the effect of spheroidal pushed-in gravity.

According to quantitative prediction of Newton's celestial mechanics for the motion of three celestial objects, an anomaly exists in three-body problem.

In a nutshell, and barring the gravitational effects of other Solar System objects, Newton's universal gravitation predicts that when there is an superior conjunction of Sun, Jupiter and Saturn, the combined gravity of Sun and a farthest Jupiter with its weakest gravitational force, would pull Saturn to a point farthest from the Sun.

FSaturn = G*mSun*mSaturn /rSaturn² + G*mJupiter*mSaturn /rmax²

where FSaturn is the gravitational force experienced by Saturn in the superior conjunction,
G
is the gravitational constant,
m
Sun is the mass of the Sun,
m
Saturn
is the mass of Saturn,
r
Saturn
is the distance of Saturn from the Sun,
m
Jupiter
is mass of Jupiter,
and
rmax is the maximum distance between Saturn and Jupiter in the superior conjunction.

On the other hand, also barring the gravitational effects of other Solar System objects, in the inferior conjunction, the combined gravity of Sun and a nearest Jupiter with its strongest gravitational force, would pull Saturn to a point nearest to the Sun.

FSaturn = G*mSun*mSaturn /rSaturn² + G*mJupiter*mSaturn /rmin²

where FSaturn is the gravitational force experienced by Saturn in the inferior conjunction,
G
is the gravitational constant, m
Sun is the mass of the Sun,
m
Saturn
is the mass of Saturn, rSaturn is the distance of Saturn from the Sun,
m
Jupiter
is mass of Jupiter,
and
rmin is the minimum distance between Saturn and Jupiter in the inferior conjunction.

But these predictions are opposite to the predictions of a mathematical construct for barycenter motion with their resolved three-body problems. For a three-body problem resolution to determine the motion of three bodies to resolve the paradoxes, mathematical patches have to be applied to make it workable for the predictions of planetary motion that are based on Newton's laws of motion and universal gravitation; such a mathematical construct is merely an ad hoc hypothesis. If the Newton's universal gravitation theory is universally correct, these anomalies for three-body system would not have existed.

By denying scientific principles, one may maintain any paradox. - Galileo Galilei

Although the mathematical construct based on Newton's celestial mechanics with the mathematical patch could work, it is not based on its first principle, and therefore it is a formal fallacy of affirming the consequent to claim that this is a scientific proof of the Newton's universal gravitation theory, which suffers an argument from fallacy by assuming the Sun is static and it is the central of the Solar System.

Although mathematics can precisely describe empirically observed natural phenomena with its hypothetical constructs, by itself it is not the correct tool to accurately describe the actualities of the natural phenomena.

Knowing how to quantitatively predict a phenomenon would work with its model is one issue, how does the phenomenon actually work in reality is another issue.

Looking back at the worst times, it always seems that they were times in which there were people who believed with absolute faith and absolute dogmatism in something. And they were so serious in this matter that they insisted that the rest of the world agree with them. And then they would do things that were directly inconsistent with their own beliefs in order to maintain that what they said was true. - Richard Feynman

From the UVS perspective, the qualitative predictions for the barycenter motion of a three-body system, is equivalent in principle with the pushed-in gravity hypothesis of UVS for a three-body system of three dominating Solar System objects, which are revolving in spiral motion on a vortical accretion disc that is encapsulated in its nested bipolar spheroidal unisonal vortex, and is vortically impelled to revolve around the Milky Way galaxy.

The Sun has had the false reputation that it is the center of the universe, and it is also not the central of the Solar System.

With the observation delusion elucidated by meticulously resolve its cognitive paradox, it reveals the obscured fact that Sun is exchanging angular momentum with all other stuff in the heliosphere to revolve around a barycenter in the Solar System, is a qualitative proof that Sun is not the central of the Solar System.

UVS predicates that the Sun is not the central of the Solar System.

The Sun has had the false reputation that it is the center of the universe,
and it is also not the central of the Solar System.
- UVS inspired -

The realization of a cognitive paradox, awakens to its transcendental perspective that elucidates its delusion. - UVS inspired -

It is a fact that a planet rotates and revolves by spiraling around a moving Sun with vortical motion while moving through space, and the Sun vortically revolves around its barycenter in the invariable plane; a planet does not just merely revolve in elliptical orbit around a static Sun. The three-body problem anomaly does not exist, it was the theory of Newton's universal gravitation with the postulations of a static Sun and gravity is a pulled-in effect had suffered foundational crisis. It is also a fact that Solar System objects intrinsically have induced internal energy and have precession effects like a spinning gyroscope.

All Solar System objects vortically revolve around the dual-core barycenter of the Solar System.- UVS inspired -

See UVS subtopics on "The cognitive paradox fallacy in Kepler's laws of planetary motion", "The orbit of natural satellite" that illustrates on how a planet vortically revolves and rotates around a moving Sun, and "A gyroscopic precession paradox" that illustrates a paradox in the motion of orthogonal rotation.

Watch a video clip on "Earth Rotation & Revolution around a moving Sun" that illustrates with an external perception for the helical motion of Earth around a moving Sun.

From the UVS perspective, when the Earth moves toward its perihelion, so at its nearest distance from the Sun with a full moon also revolving in to form the lunar opposition as a conjunction of the Sun, the Earth, and the Moon, the Moon from its usual revolving path will be pushed to a farthermost point away from the Earth by the combined vortical mass effect of the Sun and the Earth in their barycenter motion. This is contrary to the Newton's prediction that the combined gravity with a nearer Sun from the Earth in the conjunction will pull the Moon from its usual revolving path to a nearest point from the Earth.

UVS predicates that the Moon will be at a farthermost away point from the Earth in the lunar opposition during the perihelion of the Earth.


1. Planet at aphelion 2. Planet at perihelion 3. Sun

And when the Earth moves toward its aphelion, so at its farthest distance from the Sun with a full moon also revolving in to form the lunar opposition with Sun, Moon, and Earth, the Moon from its usual revolving path will be pushed to a nearest point to the Earth by the combined vortical mass effect of the Sun and the Earth in their barycenter motion. This is contrary to the Newton's prediction that the weakened effect of gravity with a farther away Sun from the Earth in the lunar opposition will cause the Moon to be pulled lesser by the gravity of the Sun for its usual revolving path to a farthermost point away from the Earth.

UVS predicates that the Moon will be at a nearest point to the Earth in the lunar opposition during the aphelion of the Earth.

See video clips on "NASA | South Up Moon Phase & Libration 2013" and "NASA | Moon Phase and Libration South Up 2014" that show in both years, when Earth was near perihelion in January, Moon in both events were at a farthermost distance (near apogee) from the Earth during the lunar oppositions, and when Earth was near aphelion in July, Moon in both events were at a nearest distance (near perigee) from the Earth during the lunar oppositions.

Collecting sufficient data with empirical observation for studying lunar opposition when these events occur near the perihelion of the Earth, can verify these qualitative predictions of UVS.

See externally linked topics on "Motions of Observable Structures Ruled by Hierarchical Two-body Gravitation in the Universe" that quantitatively predict the orbits of planets with a wobbling Sun that has a composite barycenter rendered by the barycenters of its individual planets.

Based on the UVS model, a planetary system is undulated by its stellar vortex, and it is impelled by its nested spheroidal unisonal vortex that vortically encapsulates its heliosphere. If two celestial objects are induced to revolve each other by the stellar vortex that is impelled by its spheroidal unisonal vortex and it is not precessing, in its inertial frame of reference, the two celestial objects would revolve around each other in a barycenter motion with circular orbits centering their barycenter.

From the UVS perspective, all typically manifested spheroidal unisonal vortices in nature are primarily precessing in two-axis spin, which is reflected by the empirical observations that all revolving celestial objects are precessing.

Based on unisonal vortex mechanism, a stellar vortex in precession would therefore be transformed to become a dual-core stellar vortex with the precession effect of its spheroidal unisonal vortex; this effect renders the elliptical orbit with apsidal motion on two barycenter focal points for any revolving celestial object.


A spheroid with
two rotational axes

Center of a star evolving
nearer to a barycenter (+) w/
a smaller evolving planet.

See a UVS topic on "The structure of a galaxy" that elaborates on how its vortical motion is being transferred to its star systems and their planetary systems.

See also "Lagrangian", "Lagrangian points" that elaborates on the gravitational effect on a small object in five positions of a two-body system, "THE CHARGE FIELD causes LAGRANGE POINTS" that elaborates on the causality of the Lagrangian points, and "Final Demystification of the gravitational constant variation" that elaborates on the gravitation constant G is not a constant.

From the UVS perspective, the elliptical orbit of a planet is caused by the interacting vortical motion of the Sun revolving around the BOTSS; the orbital eccentricity of a planet is a mechanical function of the planet, its star, and the dual-core barycenter of its planetary system. This can coherently explain the anomaly for the "Zombie Planet's Rogue Orbit Around Star Shocks Scientists", which the orbit of the exoplanet Fomalhaut b was inexplicable with Newton's celestial mechanics, and therefore needs a hypothetical exoplanet to mathematically patch the anomaly.

This can also coherently explain the NASA's Spitzer Space Telescope observation of a young binary star system surrounded by "Hula Hoops" of debris, which appears to be two developing stars surrounded by wobbling disks of star-formation residue; the debris rings and the binary star system revolve around the barycenter of their star system.

In the superior conjunction with the dominating barycenter of the planetary system (BOTSS), the star and the exoplanet with the BOTSS-star-exoplanet arrangement in an all-pervasive medium, the exoplanet will be vortically pushed to the nearest distance from the star.

And in the inferior conjunction with the star-BOTSS-exoplanet arrangement, the exoplanet will be vortically pushed to the farthermost distance from the star.

These vortical interactions are the causalities for the elliptical orbit of a planet as observed in the inertial reference frame of the planetary system. For a relatively less massive star as compared to its BOTSS, it will result in a high orbital eccentricity for its exoplanet in its barycenter motion; the exoplanet will have a very elliptical orbit.

In reality, a celestial object that swings around with apsidal motion in elliptical orbits, geometrically describes a torus-shaped pattern for its path in its inertial reference frame; a satellite orbit is a rendered by the vortical motion of its system of nested spheroidal vortex.


Elliptical orbit with apsidal motion.

See a UVS subtopic on "The primeval Earth and its moon" that elaborates on the ontology of Earth and Moon, and how their orbits are vortically transferred.

From the UVS perspective, the BOTSS is virtually the balanced mass center of the entire planetary system; a planet in motion dynamically interacts with its vortically wobbling star, as well as all other objects of its planetary system. In vortical resonance. The planet therefore appears to be precessing around its star in elliptical orbit with apsidal motion in a frame of reference; this is the causality for the apsidal precession of a planet in the inertia reference frame of the Solar System.

UVS predicates that the elliptical orbit of a planet with apsidal precession is rendered by its vortical interactions of its star and the barycenter of its planetary system.


As far as the laws of mathematics refer to reality, they are not certain,
and as far as they are certain, they do not refer to reality.
- Albert Einstein

If the equation for a universal law of physics cannot explain a reality
with its mathematical construct, it is not the reality was incorrect.
- UVS inspired -

Physics should adopt the qualitative studies of natural phenomena as the primary discipline
for perceiving natural phenomena that refer to reality
,
and then their quantitative studies
follow as the secondary discipline for developing their a posteriori knowledge.
- UVS inspired -

 

Spheroidal pushed-in gravitational field

This refers to the pushed-in gravitational force field with geometrical interactions that follows approximately the principle of inverse-square law, it is with almost isotropic potential in a geometry of spheroidal form that has negative pressure.

In the UVS worldview, a harmonics of resonated aether vortical motion impels a satellite by push momentum to vortically revolves around the Earth in its gravitational pressure density, and the Earth with the vortically pushed-in satellite is perpetually revolving the Sun, which is also perpetually revolving in vortical motion around the Milky Way galaxy in a galactic vortical system.

Although this spheroidal pushed-in gravity concept of UVS is equivalent in principle with Einstein's geometric gravity concept of spacetime distortion, its concept of invariant space and time filled with an aetheric medium is fundamentally different from the covariant spacetime distortion model; this is its paradigm shift from the modern physics.

In the general relativity point of view, gravity as a result of spacetime (aether) distortion causes Earth to fall perpetually into the spacetime distortion of the Sun. A satellite captured by Earth's gravity (with its spacetime distortion) to revolve around the Earth, is in essence falling perpetually into the spacetime distortion of a perpetually moving away Earth; the invariable plane where the Earth apparently sits on is in fact not at rest. In this hypothetical construct of the spacetime distortion model, the perpetual falling Earth keeps its spiraling satellites from not falling down to Earth.


2D analogy of
spacetime distortion

See UVS topics on "The cognitive paradox fallacy in Kepler's laws of planetary motion" that illustrates the foundational crisis of Kepler's model, and "UVS reviews the GR concepts of gravity" for further elaboration.

See also an externally linked topic on "Space-time Vortex", and "NASA Announces Results of Epic Space-Time Experiment" that reports on NASA had confirmed that fundamentally there is a spacetime vortex around the Earth.

 

The concept of spheroidal pushed-in gravity amalgamates and unifies

In the UVS world view, the phenomenon of gravity is caused by vortically conserved electromagnetic forces of 137-sphere of an Ultra Cosmic Spheroid, which interacts with its encapsulated medium of aether corpuscles that are displaced by matters. In its fractals of nested spheroidal unisonal vortices that are harmonically manifested in macrocosms and microcosms, the causality for all of the fundamental interactions are rendered by the aether vortical motion of the universe in the vortical spin fusion of the Ultra Cosmic Spheroid.

From the UVS perspective, all non-contact forces in nature are caused by the vortical motion of an all-pervasive inviscid aetheric medium that is confined in a nested spheroidal encapsulation; this is the ontology for all the fundamental interactions of nature.

The concept for spheroidal push-in gravity, is coherent for gravity in the macrocosms, and quantum gravity in the microcosms. The energetically charged Ultra Cosmic Spheroid in vortical motion, is also the origin for all the three other non-contact forces of nature, which are electromagnetic force, strong nuclear force, and weak nuclear force.

Heuristically, this unifies gravity in the macrocosms and microcosms, as well as amalgamates it with the three other non-contact forces of nature.

All non-contact forces in nature are rendered by vortical motion of
an inviscid medium that is all-pervasive in the observable universe.
- UVS inspired -

See UVS topics on "The structure of atom" that elaborates on vortical phenomena in the microcosms for how they are vortically impelled by the macrocosms, "Cosmic evolution of stars and galaxies" that illustrates on how all celestial objects are vortically coalesced in the macrocosms with the vortically manifested microcosms, and "Unisonal evolution mechanism" that elaborates on vortical evolution for how it begets existences from the macrocosms to the microcosms.

See also an externally linked topic on "Unified Theory Foundations" by Blaze Labs Research based on reinstated aether. In its "Replacing SI with ST units" that has defined Energy is Inverse velocity (T/S), this unifies all the measuring systems in a single framework that in conventiona wisdom are thought to be independence field of studies in different disciplines. "What looks so unconventional in the ST unification table is the fact that matter is a 3D version of energy, and that energy or 1D mass, is the inverse of velocity. Once cleared these two weird links, it becomes immediately clear that the ST table should be the real fundamental measuring system of science.", for example, Newton's law: F=ma=m(dv/dt); comparing with V= L(dI/dt), where voltage has the same dimensions of force, Inductance the same dimensions of mass and current same dimensions of velocity. "It is clear that the equations are actually the same, and that V=L(dI/dt) is actually Newton's law of motion." - Excerpts from Blaze Labs Research under UTF.

 

 


Glossary:
actuality
-
The quality or state of being actual or real.
cognitive paradox
-
A category of paradox with illusions that are pertaining to perception or awareness, such as with relative motion illusion, optical illusion, tactile illusion and the likes.
delusion
-
A false belief or opinion: delusions of grandeur.
enlightenment
-
Full comprehension of a situation with clarity of perception.
first principle
-
The first basis from which a thing is known.
holistic
-
Concerned with wholes rather than analysis or separation into parts.
hypothesis 
-
A proposition, or set of propositions, set forth as an explanation for the occurrence of some specified group of phenomena, either asserted merely as a provisional conjecture to guide investigation (working hypothesis) or accepted as highly probable in the light of established facts. 
inversed illusion
-
A peculiar type of illusion that paradoxically appears in an inverse manner.
macrocosm
-
The great world or universe; the universe considered as a whole (opposed to microcosm ). A representation of a smaller unit or entity by a larger one, presumably of a similar structure.
microcosm
-
A little world; a world in miniature (opposed to macrocosm ).
observable universe
-
The observable segment of the universe.
paradigm
-
A set of forms all of which contain a particular element, esp. the set of all inflected forms based on a single stem or theme.
paradox
-
Any thing, or situation exhibiting an apparently contradictory nature with false proposition.
spheroid 
-
A geometrical figure similar in shape to a sphere, such as an ellipsoid.
theory 
-
A coherent group of general propositions used as principles of explanation for a class of phenomena. 
universe
-
The totality of known or supposed objects and phenomena throughout space; the cosmos; macrocosm. It is beyond the defined observable universe.
viscous
-
Having the property of viscosity; sticky.

 

~ With credits to James Aaron Nicholson for his theory "Tiny Bits Part I on Gravity", this has inspired that gravity mechanism is a pushed-in effect instead of pulled-in effect.

~ With thanks to David Levi Wing (aka dleviwing, moderator of TOEQuest forum) for his post #404 that links a video clip on "Waves in a Large Free Sphere of Water".

~ With thanks to Graham Burnett (aka G_burnett of TOEQuest Forum) for his post #406 that links a video clip on "Surface tension of water in microgravity".

~ With thanks to Dean Ward (aka junglelord) for his link on "Magnetic Scalar Wave detector" by Quantum AetherDynamics Institute.

~ With thanks to anonymous for his link on "Zombie Planet's Rogue Orbit Around Star Shocks Scientists" that highlight the anomaly on the orbit of an exoplanet.

 

March 2008

References and links:
Epistemology - From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Empiricism - From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Matter - From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Reactive centrifgual force - From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Precession - From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Universe - From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Plasma lamp - From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Tiny Bits Part I on Gravity - James Aaron Nicholson
Inverse-square law - From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Gravity - From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Point mass - From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Newton's law of universal gravitation - From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Newton's Principia - xtimeline
Action at a distance - From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Einstein's Geometric Gravity - Einstein online
Observable universe - From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Tesla's Dynamic Theory of Gravity - PESWiki.com
The mechanical explanations of gravitation - From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Vortex dynamics - From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
What is the difference between 'matter' and 'mass'? - From CliffsNotes.com
Le Sage's theory of gravitation - From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Potential energy - From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Luminiferous aether - From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Astrophysical plasma - From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Electrostatics - From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Invariable plane - From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Potential density - From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Isotropy - From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Fluid statics
- From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Energy density - From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Casmir effect
- From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Elliptic orbit - From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Plane of rotation - From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Compressibility of water (molecule) - From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Gradient - From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Fundamental interaction - From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Non-contact force - From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Heuristic - From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Barycenter - From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Magnetotail - From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Binary star system SS443 - From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Antipodal - From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Ellipsoid
- From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Tidal force - From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Superior and inferior conjunction - From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Newton's celestial mechanics - From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Three-body problem - From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Newton's laws of motion - From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Ad hoc hypothesis - From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Formal fallacy - From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Affirming the consequent - From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Argument from fallacy - From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Foundational crisis - From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Perihelion - From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Aphelion - From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Orbital eccentricity - From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
"Zombie" Planet's Rogue Orbit Around Star Shocks Scientists - SPACE.com
A young binary star system surrounded by "Hula Hoops" of debris - NATURE WORLD NEWS
Apsidal precession - From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Hierarchical Two-body Gravitation in the Universe - By Dr Yongfeng Yang of Bureau of Water Resources of Shandong Province.
Motions of Observable Structures Ruled by Hierarchical Two-body Gravitation in the Universe - By
Dr Yongfeng Yang of Bureau of Water Resources of Shandong Province.
Lagrangian - From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Lagrangian points - From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
THE CHARGE FIELD causes LAGRANGE POINTS - by Miles Mathis
Absolute time and space - From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Einstein's Geometric Gravity - Einstein online
Spacetime - From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Space-time Vortex - SCIENCE@NASA

Force dynamics - From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Video clip on Waves in a Large Free Sphere of Water - NASA
Video clip on surface tension of water in microgravity - NASA
Video clip on NASA | South Up Moon Phase & Libration 2013 - NASA
Video clip on NASA | Moon Phase and Libration South Up 2014
- NASA
Image of inverse-square law - www.acousticalsurfaces.com
Image of elliptical orbit with apsidal motion - By Mpfiz
Image of Earth in aphelion and perihelion - Pearson Scott Foresman
Animation for barycenter of a conjunction - By Vincent Wee Foo

 

 

 

Disclaimers: The treatise of Universal Vortical Singularity (UVS) in its epistemological paradigm shift, is fundamentally unconventional. Its hypotheses based on the unheard-of UVS model, are bounded to have shortcomings, loose ends, and errors. Many details and assumptions of its propositions established in the conceptual frameworks of UVS, have yet to be further researched, probed, evaluated, validated, or proven. Its implicit explanations are for casual understanding of the topics presented in the UVS worldview, and any term or statement if offensive in any manner or whatsoever is most regretted. Links to other sites do not imply endorsement of their contents; apply appropriate discretion whenever necessary. Inevitably for whatsoever reasons, some viewing devices at times could experience data corruption for text, disorganized content layouts, missing images, failed animations, and some external links might have had ceased to exist. The presentations of the web pages are not friendly to small mobile devices, it is therefore recommended to accessed and view the UVS contents with a system device that has a larger screen, such as personal computer, android tablet, or iPad. For the best experience to explore UVS, it is better to use a MS Windows based PC or device using Internet Explorer or Firefox installed with Java that works for its interactive applets. (Such as Java Applet of Moiré pattern, JPL Small-Body Database Browser, and Planet Finder.)

Copyright information: This UVS web site is for non-profit purposes and not for commercial use. Wherever possible, direct credits to the origin of the work or images were provided, be it on fair dealing, with explicit permission from their owners, or the materials were believed to be in the public domain. In instances for which any external material has any issue, kindly advise for its proper.