Remark:
This abstract is a fundamental concept of UVS, it was developed in the
UVS worldview with its aether-based concept.
“The
mass effect of matter is caused by aether vortical motion
that renders the phenomenon of universal gravitation.”
- UVS inspired
-
In
the UVS worldview,
all celestial bodies are vortically traversing in a nested vortical hypersphere
of the cosmos, which is filled with an all-pervasive inviscid
aetheric medium. All matters[w]
in the cosmos[w]
are impelled by aether
vortical motion[uvs] to maintain integrity for
their vortically resonated structural forms, and they are coalesced by
the hyperspherical
vortex spin fusion[uvs] of aether with repulsion
effect.
See
the UVS topics on "Vortical
gravitational singularity" that elaborates on the higher order
virtual barycenters of the universe, "Scientific
evidence and proofs for aether does physically exist", and
"The CMB dipole"
that evidently illustrates an empirically observed nested spheroidal torus
vortex in the observable universe.
See
an externally linked paper on "The
Planck aether model for a unified theory of elementary particles"
that elaborates on a vortex field below the Planck scale having the form
of a vortex lattice, which can propagate two types of waves, one having
the property of Maxwell's electromagnetic and the other one the property
of Einstein's gravitational waves.
The vortical core-seeking force renders the binding
effect of hyperspherical pushed-in gravitational field
From
the UVS perspective, the effect of gravity being experienced as an inertial
force, paradoxically thought as effect that pulls in toward the matters
of an object with the postulated Newtonian physics, is being rendered
by quantized electromagnetic vortices that have had isotrophically manifested
in the closed
system[w] of a
nested spheroidal torus vortex[uvs] with the
precession effects of its two-axis spin.
With
the image as illustrated on top right, visualize every line from
the surface of the electrostatic spheroidal confinement to its core,
is a longitudinal wave in the form of dipole quantized unisonal
vortex, which has a perpetual vortical pushed-in effect towards
the core. All mass is vortical interaction.
This
suggests gravity is an effect of electrostatic pressure, and it
is manifested by quantized vortices to push matters
inward to the core in a spheroidal confinement with their vortical
repulsion force. This renders as the effect of centripetal
acceleration[w].
Gravitational
force is manifested in the nested vortical hypersphere of the cosmos
with the perpetual vortical push-in interaction of its aether vortical
motion.
In
the UVS worldview, these quantized unisonal vortices are spawned
by aether
vortical motion[uvs] with precession[w]
effects in its spheroidal confinement that wobbles in a primary
two-axis spin. The vortical interactions with the potential density
of energy in its closed system consolidated by volumetric pressure
in a spheroidal confinement, repels matter electrostatically inside
a nested spheroidal torus vortex with reactive
centrifugal force[w] generated by the
manifested quantized vortices.
The
image of a plasma
lamp as illustrated on bottom right with loosely packed vortical
structures, illuminated by the glowing plasma filaments, is for
simulating the dynamics of tightly packed quantized electromagnetic
vortices that renders the effect of pushed-in gravity. |
|
An
illustration of quantized vortices in a spheroidal confinement. |

A
plasma lamp.
|
*
With credits to James
Aaron Nicholson for his theory on "Tiny
Bits Part I on Gravity" that indirectly suggests gravity is a
push effect instead of pull effect. This ingenious idea on gravity he
mulled for more than forty years, elucidates the delusion of pulled-in
gravity in the UVS worldview.
The
UVS research predicates gravity is vortically rendered by quantized electromagnetic
vortices. With
credits to James
Aaron Nicholson.
The UVS research predicates gravity is a manifestation of vortical core-seeking
motion in a hypersphere and it vortically pushes matters inward to the
mass center. Inspired
by Tiny Bits Part I on
Gravity.
The
Newton's
law of universal gravitation[w] with the
assumption of a static Sun resembles Coulomb's law of electrical
forces in an inertial frame of reference, which is used to approximately
calculate the magnitude of electrical force between two charged
bodies.
Both
are inverse-square laws in their inertial frames of reference, in
which the forces are inversely proportional to the square of the
distance between the bodies.
The
inverse-square law equations (Excerpts
from
Blaze
Labs Research) governing
the three different force fields are: |
Electrostatic
Force: |
F
= KQ1Q2/R² |
(K=1/4pieo,
Q= charge, R = distance) |
Gravitational
Force: |
F
= GM1M2/R² |
(G=
gravitational constant, M= mass, R = distance ) |
Magnetic Force: |
F = UM1M2/R² |
(U=u/4pio,
M= magnetic monopoles strength, R = distance) |
|
|
|
Inverse-square
law illustration.
(Intensity = 1/d²) |
|
Gravity[w]
has been thought and believed by the mainstream with the Newtonian physics
that it's effect is attraction, as in the attraction by point
mass[w] that pulls in toward the center of mass.
This was as explained with Newton's
law of universal gravitation[w] and Newton's
Principia[m] with the action
at a distance[w] concept. The Einsteinian
geometric gravity[m] concept in its abstract
of a curved spacetime that is void of an all-pervasive medium, also has
to be thought as a pulled-in force for explaining the effect of gravity.
The
scientifically proven existence of energy
density in vacuum space[w],
is a piece of compelling evidence that aether exists.
And
it is in the energy density of this postulated aetheric medium, the mass
effect of matter is vortically manifested with its density gradient.
From
the UVS perspective, the superpositioning[w]
of the longitudinal waves of aether in the form of dipole quantized unisonal
vortices that push toward the core of an object, would render the effect
of inverse-square
law[w] for its gravitational force.
See
the UVS topic on "The
vortical hypersphere of 137 nested 3-spheres"
that illustrates how an electromagnetic hypersphere system of 137 3-spheres
manifested by the nested vortical hypersphere of the cosmos, could render
the fundamental
interactions of the strong force, the weak force, and the push-in
effect of gravity.
“All
mass is interaction.”
-
Richard Feynman
.
The causality of
gravity
Based
on the UVS
model, the empirically observed CMB
dipole[uvs]
in precession is coalesced by a spheroidal
torus vortex[uvs]
of hypersphere that encapsulates the entire observable
universe[w]
in its vortically manifested spheroidal volumetric pressure system.
In
the UVS worldview,
the phenomenon of energy in the closed system of the observable
universe, is a physically manifested effect of a cosmic vortical
motion of aether rendered by the precession effect of the cosmos. |

The
CMB Dipole
[s]
|
The
mass effect of matter is caused by the aether
vortical motion[uvs] of the cosmos to render
the phenomenon of universal gravitation.
Gravitational
force is a manifestation of the aether vortical motion of the cosmos with
its repulsion effect; gravity is the vortical repulsion
effect of its hyperspherical encapsulation of the cosmos.
“Aether
vortical motion vortically pushes out all sources of electromagnetic radiation
in the universe, and causes the spheroidal pushed-in effect as universal
gravitation
in its vortically conceived nested spheroidal encapsulation.”
- UVS inspired
-
See
the UVS topic on "The
UVS reviews on the General Relativity concepts of gravity"
for further elaborations on the repulsive nature
of gravity.
See
externally linked topics on "Tesla's
Dynamic Theory of Gravity" that explains the relation between
gravitation and electromagnetic force as a unified field theory (a model
over matter, the aether, and energy), "The
mechanical explanations of gravitation" hypothesized by Lord
Kelvin, "Vortex
dynamics" of Hermann von Helmholtz, "What
is the difference between 'matter' and 'mass'?", and "Le
Sage's theory of gravitation" that elaborates on push gravity.
Electrostatic
potential
energy[w],
in a nested plasmatic celestial spheroid, is the phenomenon
of stationary electric charge confined within electrically
isolated boundary of the nested spheroid as an at-rest mass,
of matter, in an inertia reference frame.
Thus
above so postulated is the effect of aether[w]
potential in absolute space moving in absolute motion, with
vortical momentum that would vortically consolidate plasmatic
viscous matter into resonated boundary state exist, and moves
the matter at absolute velocity within the nested spheroid
vortically.
The
vortical effects in unison thus manifest as the four known
fundamental forces of nature in a unisonal conjoin. |
|
A
nested torus-shape structure. |
|
Note: The above was co-edited with Graham Burnett. With special thanks
for his inputs and contributions with his remarkable writing skills.
|
“I
agree with you Graham that gravity is NOT a pull event.”
- James A. Graber (aka Jag of TOEQuest
Forum) with twenty-five years into vortex research, 14th Nov 2008.
“I
must in the full recognition of the fine work he does give thanks to Vincent
Wee-Foo, for his platform of ponder for explanation of gravity being a
push in effect.” -
Graham Burnett
In
a nested spheroidal torus vortex (in
essence this is a nested plasmatic bubble) of a
hypersphere system[uvs] of 137 nested
3-spheres, the repulsive electrostatic force of negative pressure
conserved in the encapsulation of its hypersphere would render an
electrostatic potential density. With its density gradient approximately
subjected to the principle of inverse-square law, it thus renders
the effect of gravity.
Heuristically[w],
luminiferous
aether[w]
pervades throughout the entire cosmos, and its potential density
conserved in its vortically weaved nested boundaries to render the
intrinsic volumetric pressure, is the causality of gravity in the
macrocosms[d]
and the microcosms[d]. |
|
An illustration for the formation of nested torus structure
with Moiré pattern. [s] |
|
See
the UVS topics on "Michelson-Morley
experiment reviewed with UVS"
that elaborates on the cognitive paradox fallacies of a hallmark aether
experiment, and
"The
UVS perspective on dark matter and dark energy"
that
elaborates on the existence of an all-pervasive universal medium
"Even
though electrostatically induced forces seem to be rather weak, the electrostatic
force between e.g. an electron and a proton, that together make up a hydrogen
atom, is about 36 orders of magnitude stronger than the gravitational
force acting between them." - Excerpt
from Wikipedia on "Electrostatics".
In
the UVS worldview, the effects of electrostatic force that occurs within
a
nested galactic spheroidal torus vortex[uvs],
and thus withheld a
galactic structure[uvs],
in
its vortical paradigm is
similar to subatomic world that this electrostatic
force is much stronger than gravitational force.
Gravitational
force in a local reference frame is an electrostatic pushed-in effect,
in the reference frame of its grander vortical motion, it is an accumulated
electromagnetic pushed-in effect of a 137
nested 3-spheres vortical hypersphere cosmos[uvs].
See
the UVS topics on "A
star is vortically formed in a larger vortical system that impels its
galaxy" that illustrates with empirical evidence to assert that
gravity is a spheroidal pushed-in inertial force, and "Vortical
elementary and subatomic particles" that elaborates on the fundamental
forces of nature.
Note:
The electrostatic repelling force of electric charge is billions of times
stronger than gravity, see externally linked topics on "Electrostatics"
by Dr. Dave Hopper,
and planetary gravity in "The
Electro-Magnetic Radiation Pressure (EMRP) Gravity Theory" from
Blaze Labs Research.
Air
could be removed inside a sealed container with an atmospheric vacuum
pump, this would create a phenomenon of vacuum that is void of air, as
such atmospheric pressure will be crushing on the container. Nonetheless,
energy
density[w] is still detectable in this vacuum,
this is the evidence of the all-pervasive aetheric medium.
This aetheric medium with potential density weakly interacts with the
matter that makes up the container, mostly flowing through it like the
physical boundary of the container is quite hollow to this aetheric medium.
The inertial force of this vortical repulsion effect, would cause the
container and any physical object contained inside it, to be pushed by
this aetheric medium to flow towards the vortical
gravitational singularity[uvs] of the Earth
with acceleration as a result of its density gradient. This accelerated
flow-in perpetual
vortical motion[uvs] renders the phenomenon
of gravity we all are experiencing.
Do
an interactive experiment to contemplate the pushed-in effect of
volumetric pressure
When a suction
cup pressing on a smooth surface has its air molecules mechanically
squeezed out within its enclosure, the suction cup would hold firmly
onto the smooth surface. This is a pushed-in effect that is rendered
by the atmospheric pressure. This simple interactive experiment
demonstrates the concept of pushed-in effect for simulating the
proposed pushed-in effect of gravity. |
Suction
cup. |
.
Soap
bubble metaphor
The
pushed-in gravity concept can also be illustrated with a soap bubble metaphor,
although this can be quite easy to understand, it nevertheless is very
paradoxical and counterintuitive.
For
a freely suspended air bubble with potential
density[w] rendered by spheroidal volumetric
pressure, which is formed in atmospheric viscous matter with an outer
skin of liquid, the repelling force of air pressure by inverse-square
law will push and consolidate those higher density air molecules inside
the bubble toward the core.
It
can be qualitatively predicted in a simplified manner with a steady state
air bubble containing carbon dioxide, oxygen and nitrogen that have molecular
weight of 44.01u, 32.00u and 28.01u respectively, the heaviest carbon
dioxide molecules will consolidate in cluster as a spheroid and occupy
the inner core. The oxygen molecules will overlay on the carbon dioxide
spheroid and the lightest nitrogen molecules will overlay on the outermost
layer inside the bubble.
Perceivably,
the air molecules are being persistently pushed toward the core
with the inertial force repelled from the equipotential surface
of the spheroidal air bubble, which is formed under atmospheric
pressure.
Should
the smaller bubble be induced to merge into the bigger bubble, the
nitrogen molecules would be mixed in the nitrogen layer of the larger
bubble, while the oxygen and carbon dioxide molecules, would be
pushed by the nitrogen molecules to move toward the core to reach
their spheroidal molecular clusters accordingly.
If
a bubble of nitrogen is introduced inside the carbon dioxide spheroid
at a six o'clock position as shown, it would be pushed outward by
the heavier density carbon dioxide molecules, relatively rising
to the surface on a easiest path, and could be observed to be moving
in a vertical downward direction passing through the oxygen molecule
layer, and eventually reaches the nitrogen layer. |
|
Diagram
of a steady state suspended air bubble with a smaller bubble
on the outer skin. [uvs] |
|
This
soap bubble metaphor is just for analogy purposes, there are many details
involved that need to be addressed, such as the extend of how much the
carbon dioxide molecules would sink in the soap bubble under the effect
of gravity. Nevertheless, the primary focus of this metaphor is on qualitative
analysis for emulating the fundamental working principles of gravity as
a pushed-in force imploding towards a zero-point.
At
a certain angular speed when a clump of oxygen molecules with resonated
centrifugal force of two-axis spin overcomes its cohesive force from the
oxygen layer, it will breakaway and escape from the main layer to naturally
form a smaller oxygen spheroid that has the most efficient geometric shape.
This
smaller oxygen spheroid can find an equipotential density region somewhere
in the nitrogen layer, its distance from the core would proportionally
depend on the induced centrifugal force within the spheroidal volumetric
pressure that pushes in heavier matters. The spin that pushes the smaller
oxygen spheroid away from the center by the centrifugal force, would be
held back by centripetal
force[w] with pressure in the nitrogen layer
that pushes heavier matters toward the center. And persistently impelled
by the torque-induced
precession[w] in a two-axis spin, the smaller
oxygen spheroid would perpetually revolve in an elliptic
orbit[w] around the larger oxygen spheroid in
its plane
of rotation[w].
“I
have often made the hypothesis that ultimately physics will not require
a mathematical statement,
that in the end the machinery will be revealed and the laws will turn
out to be simple.”
-
Richard Feynman
“Aether
vortical motion entails the omnipotent physical law of the cosmos.”
- UVS inspired
-
See
the UVS topics on "The
unisonal vortex mechanism", and "The
vortically manifested planetary orbitals" for elaboration on
how all celestial objects are rotating and revolving in vortical motion.
See
also
video clips "Waves
in a Large Free Sphere of Water", and "Surface
tension of water in microgravity" for
some interesting NASA experiments done on the International Space station.
.
A
thought experiment to simulate the hyperspherical pushed-in gravity
with huge a balloon held in deep ocean
To
conceptually simulate the effect of gravity, do a thought
experiment to imagine a huge balloon filled with air (lets
say its size is one thousand kilometer) is held in
deep ocean, the volume of air within the balloon is encapsulated
in an ocean of water would therefore be subjected to tremendous
pressure.
The
air in the balloon displaces a volume of water would push
outwardly in almost isotropy (barring
that water pressure is relative to its depth would cause variation
in uniformity of the isotropy effect)
is met with an with an equal opposite force of the water mass
in ocean that pushes inward around the balloon in its spheroidal
confinement with the pressure in ocean. |

A
balloon.
|
Water
around pushes against the balloon would be compacted to have density
gradient following the inverse-square law of water pressure that
is proportional to the volume of water displaced, hence, at region
nearer to the surface of the balloon, the density of water would
be higher according to square of distance.
This
would generate an inertial acceleration that implodes around the
balloon; this could illustrate the spheroidal pushed-in effect for
simulating the causality for gravity.
The
concept of hyperspherical pushed-in gravity could explain why
matters of different mass, subjected to its inertial acceleration
in the vortical flow, would be pushed toward the center of the Earth
with the same acceleration.
Drop
a tiny pebble (with density just slightly higher that water) into
the ocean so that it would drop down (assuming there is no drift
in water) to pass near the balloon. When the pebble comes near the
balloon in a region of water that has higher density, it would be
deflected toward the balloon in a pushed-in manner by higher density
water surrounding the balloon and therefore the pebble would drop
in a curved path on its way down.
If
the density of a barrier of water around the balloon is compressed
to be higher than the density of the pebble, and if the dropping
pebble could not overcome the escape velocity of the higher density
water when it got near the balloon, the pebble would be caught in
a high density region of water pushing it towards the balloon and
held it levitated on a pause layer of water (with higher density
than the pebble) that surrounds as a nested layer of the huge balloon.
Release
small air bubbles below the huge balloon, on their way up seeking
least resistance paths, these air bubbles would be repelled away
in curve paths by the higher density water compressed around the
huge balloon.
The
pushed-in effects of fluid around the huge balloon, could simulate
the mechanism of gravity.
In
the UVS worldview, the phenomenon of gravity is caused by aether
vortical motion[uvs] to vortically repel
matters within the encapsulation of a
hypersphere system[uvs]. In the harmonics
of aether vortical motion for nested formation of spheroidal torus
vortex from the macrocosms to the microcosms, the causality of the
fundamental
interactions[w], are entirely compatible.
If
the water pressure around the balloon is gradually reduced by an
underwater
whirlpool[uvs], the balloon will proportionally
swell with the reduced water pressure. |
.
The
causality of tidal force -
A paradoxical mutual pushed-in gravity effect
Based
on the UVS
model, a nested vortical
hypersphere[uvs]
of the cosmos[w]
forms the CMB dipole[uvs],
and this manifests the effect of universal gravity. And this renders the
hyperspherical
pushed-in gravity[uvs]
for all its vortically manifest physical structures.
The
hyperspherical pushed-in gravity that acts on two celestial objects would
be mutually perturbed in a region to render the paradoxical effect of
gravitational pull on each other, the below image on right illustrates
on how the overall gravitational pushed-in force in a gravitational shadow
region of the two celestial objects, could render the apparent effect
of a gravitational pulled-in force acting on each other.
The
arrows around the blue hypothetical equipotential encapsulation
represent the overall hyperspherical pushed-in gravity acting on
the two celestial objects.
The
grey region between the two celestial spheroids is the gravitational
shadow region where the overall pushed-in gravitational force is
reduced in a mutual blockage of the pushed-in gravitational force,
whereas the smaller black arrows inside the two celestial objects,
indicate their focal points.
The
gravitational subtraction of the overall pushed-in gravitational
force acting in the gravitational shadow region, would render the
apparent effect of gravitational pulled-in forces mutually acting
on each other for the two celestial objects.
These
celestial objects are being pushed in from all directions at outside
the gravitational shadow region, and therefore viscous matter on
the celestial objects would be internally pushed out most intensely
at the focal points in the shadow region; this is a delusional observation
rendered in its cognitive paradox for a celestial object to appear
as being pulled by the external gravitational force.
The
barycenter[w]
motion of two celestial objects that are precessing with sling actions
would cause their viscous matter mediums to be vortically pushed
out at the antipodals[w]
at the opposite ends of the two celestial objects (green arrows
indicate these focal points in the above image).
In
equivalence, the force magnitude for the pushed-in viscous matter
medium of a celestial object in the gravitational shadow region,
with conservation of angular momentum it is matched by the pushed-out
viscous matter medium at the antipodal of the celestial object.
These effects transform a celestial object from oblate spheroid
to become an ellipsoid. |
A
simplified illustration for pushed-in gravity acting on two
celestial objects that render the apparent effect of a pulled-in
gravity acting on each other. [uvs] |
|

Tidal force field acting on a celestial object.
[s]

An
ellipsoid. [s]
|
The
UVS research predicates the tidal force is vortically caused by a universal
hyperspherical pushed-in gravity with the reactive push momentum in its
barycenter motion.
In
the UVS worldview, the
two equipotential tidal bulges of a celestial object, are caused by the
torque-induced precession of another interacting celestial object. And
the potential energy for the tidal
locking[w] of a celestial object, is also vortically
rendered.
This
vortical pushed-in effect could coherently explain the spiral magnetotail
phenomenon of a celestial object, and these could be empirically observed
in planets and also some binary star systems, such as the magnetotail
of Earth[w], and the binary
star system SS443[m].
The
gravitational pushed-in effect acting on two elastic celestial objects
with their barycenter motion could comprehensive and coherently explain
the two tidal bulges on Earth, and how an elastic celestial spheroid could
become ellipsoid[w]
in a vortical force field.
A
rotating and revolving elastic ellipsoidal celestial object that also
wobbles, could be transformed into a dual-core elongated toroid; an oblate
spheroidal torus vortex.
The
pushed-in gravity mechanism could resolve the cognitive paradox that mysteriously
render the two tidal bulges on an elastic celestial spheroid; hyperspherical
pushed-in gravity with barycenter motion is the causality for
tidal force[w].
This
universal mechanism is also applicable for all atomic, subatomic and fundamental
particles in the microcosms.
See
a video clip on "SkyMarvels™
EARTH-MOON BARYCENTER" that illustrates the barycenter motion
of Earth with its revolving moon.
.
A
thought experiment for visualizing the pushed-in universal gravitational
force of a planetary system
The
illustrated 2D animation for unisonal vortex in the top view
of a nested toroidal vortex, can be used to contemplate on
the underlying vortical dynamic of a planetary
system[w].
From
the UVS perspective, in a resonance of aether vortical motion
that manifests a typical planetary system, such as our Solar
System, the
manifested matters[uvs] vortically
coalesce into the inner ring with sufficient energy, would
form the lit up star with the vortical pushed-in momentum
of aether
corpuscles[uvs], and therefore the
vortically manifested star wobbles around the vortically manifested
barycenter of the resonated unisonal vortex. |
|
Matters vortically
coalesce in the outer rings, will form as its satellites, which
are also coalesced by the pushed-in momentum of resonated harmonics
from the resonance of aether
vortical motion[uvs]. And it can be conceptually visualized
that these satellites rotate and revolve around the barycenter,
are caused by the pushed-in force of aether vortical motion.
“All
celestial objects are externally impelled to rotate and revolve
in vortical motion with resonated precession effects.”
- UVS inspired
-
In
absolute space and time, the cosmos with an all-pervasive aether,
manifests the universal gravitational force by the vortical pushed-in
momentum of aether corpuscles that renders the mass effect of matter.
The causality for universal gravitation as experienced by the star
and its satellites, as well as all celestial objects in the physical
universe, is manifested from the strong repulsive force of aether
vortical motion, which is transferred from the pushed-in momentum
of aether
corpuscles[uvs], and thus are pushing the matters that have
had displaced the aether corpuscles. |
.
The
interactions of the hyperspherical pushed-in gravity in superior
and inferior conjunction
 |
In
the superior conjunction of Sun, Jupiter and Saturn from
a side view, the distance Ds with the Sun's axis is pushed
nearer to the barycenter
(red + symbol), Saturn would
be at a nearest distance from the Sun. (Ds < Di). |
|
 |
In
the inferior conjunction of Sun, Jupiter and Saturn
from a side view, the distance Di with the Sun's axis
is pushed farther from the barycenter
(red + symbol), Saturn
would be at a farthermost distance from the Sun. |
|
Note:
The above diagrams for illustrating pushed-in gravity and the conjunctions
of Solar System objects, are not to scale for size and distance.
Based
on the UVS
model, the Sun is coalesced by its stellar vortex, which is
vortically impelled by its nested hyperspherical vortex.
In
precession cycles, the Sun in barycenter motion exchanging
angular momentum with all stuff encapsulated in the toroidal
unisonal vortex, vortically moves in and out of the barycenter
while revolving around it.
From
the UVS perspective, with its proposition for a hyperspherical
pushed-in gravity effect, in the superior conjunction of an
aligned Jupiter-Sun-Saturn, with balanced interactions of
Jupiter and Saturn acting on the Sun in a hyperspherical pushed-in
gravity effect for seeking their equivalence of center, the
Sun would be pushed away from the barycenter of the conjunction
to a nearest point from Saturn.
The
UVS research predicates the superior conjunction of Jupiter-Sun-Saturn
would push Saturn to a nearest point from the Sun with the
effect of the hyperspherical pushed-in gravity.
And
in the inferior conjunction, the Sun would be pushed away
from the barycenter of the conjunction to a farthermost point
from Saturn.
The
UVS research predicates the inferior conjunction of Sun-Jupiter-Saturn
would push Saturn to a farthermost point from the Sun with
the effect of the hyperspherical pushed-in gravity. |
|
Reference
frame of this animation is fixed on the barycenter (+)
of Sun, Jupiter and Saturn.
This animation illustrates the movement of the Sun in
a 3-body motion. [uvs] |
|
See
the UVS topic on "Sunspot"
that elaborates on how it qualitatively resolved more than a dozen
mysterious phenomena of the Sun with this visual inductive resolution.
See
also an externally linked topic on "Superior
and inferior conjunction" that explicates on the conjunctions
of celestial objects.
According
to quantitative prediction of Newton's
celestial mechanics[w] for the motion
of three celestial objects, an anomaly exists in three-body
problem[w].
The
cognitive paradox of the three-body problem, is rendered with the
assumption of the Sun is the center of the Solar System.
In
a nutshell, and barring the gravitational effects of other Solar
System objects, Newton's universal gravitation predicts that when
there is an superior conjunction of Sun, Jupiter and Saturn, the
combined gravity of Sun and a farthest Jupiter with its weakest
gravitational force, would pull Saturn to a point farthest from
the Sun.
FSaturn
= G*mSun*mSaturn
/rSaturn²
+ G*mJupiter*mSaturn
/rmax²
where
FSaturn
is the gravitational force experienced
by Saturn in the superior conjunction,
G is the gravitational constant,
mSun
is the mass of the Sun,
mSaturn
is the mass of Saturn,
rSaturn
is
the distance of Saturn from the Sun,
mJupiter
is
mass of Jupiter,
and
rmax
is the maximum distance between Saturn and Jupiter
in the superior conjunction.
On the other hand, also barring the gravitational effects of other
Solar System objects, in the inferior conjunction, the combined
gravity of Sun and a nearest Jupiter with its strongest gravitational
force, would pull Saturn to a point nearest to the Sun.
FSaturn
= G*mSun*mSaturn
/rSaturn²
+ G*mJupiter*mSaturn
/rmin²
where FSaturn
is the gravitational force experienced by
Saturn in the inferior conjunction,
G is the gravitational constant,
mSun
is the mass of the Sun,
mSaturn
is the mass of Saturn,
rSaturn
is
the distance of Saturn from the Sun,
mJupiter
is
mass of Jupiter,
and
rmin
is the minimum distance between Saturn and Jupiter
in the inferior conjunction.
But these predictions
contradict the predictions of the mathematical construct for barycenter[w]
motion of three-body problems.
For
a three-body problem resolution to determine the motion of three
bodies to resolve the paradoxes, mathematical patches have to be
applied to make it workable for the predictions of planetary motion
that are based on Newton's
laws of motion[w] and universal
gravitation[w]; such a mathematical construct
is merely an ad
hoc hypothesis[w] with mathematical
fallacy[w] rendered by its intentional
invalid mathematical proof.
If the Newton's universal gravitation theory is universally correct,
these anomalies for three-body system would not exist.
“By
denying scientific principles, one may maintain any paradox.”
-
Galileo Galilei
Although
the mathematical construct based on Newton's celestial mechanics
with the mathematical patch could pragmatically work, it is not
based on its first principle, and therefore it is a formal
fallacy[w] of affirming
the consequent[w] to claim that this is
a scientific proof of the Newton's universal gravitation theory.
It suffers the argument
from fallacy[w] by assuming the Sun is
static and it is the center of the Solar System; it is merely a
mathematical construct that does not really refer to reality.
Despite
mathematics can precisely describe empirically observed natural
phenomena with its validated hypothetical constructs, by itself
it is not the correct tool to accurately describe the actualities
of the natural phenomena.
Knowing
how to quantitatively predict a phenomenon would work with its model
is one thing, how does the phenomenon actually work in reality[w]
could be another thing.
“Looking
back at the worst times, it always seems that they were times
in which there were people who believed with absolute faith
and absolute dogmatism in something. And they were so serious
in this matter that they insisted that the rest of the world
agree with them. And then they would do things that were directly
inconsistent with their own beliefs in order to maintain that
what they said was true.”
- Richard Feynman |
From
the UVS perspective, the predication for the barycenter motion of
a three-body system, is equivalent in principle with the pushed-in
gravity hypothesis of UVS for a three-body system of three dominating
Solar System objects, which are revolving in a spiral motion on
a vortical accretion disk that is encapsulated in its nested bipolar
torus vortex, and is vortically impelled to revolve around the Milky
Way[w] galaxy.
The
Sun is not the center of the Solar System.
The
UVS research predicates the Sun is not the center of the Solar System.
With
the observation delusion elucidated by meticulously resolve its
cognitive paradox, it reveals the obscured fact that Sun is exchanging
angular momentum with all other stuff in the heliosphere to revolve
around a barycenter in the Solar System, is a qualitative
proof that Sun is not the center of the Solar System. And
the planets are actually revolving around the barycenter of the
Solar System, which spirals in helical motion in the galactic system
of the Milky way.
It
is a fact that a planet rotates and revolves by spiraling around
the barycenter of the Solar System with vortical motion while it
is moving through space, and the Sun vortically revolves around
its barycenter in the invariable
plane[w]; a planet does not just merely
revolve in elliptical
orbit[w] around a static Sun. The three-body
problem anomaly does not exist, it was the theory of Newton's universal
gravitation with the postulations[d]
of a static Sun and gravity is a pulled-in effect had suffered foundational
crisis[w]. It is also a fact that Solar
System objects intrinsically have induced internal energy and have
precession effects like a spinning gyroscope.
“All
Solar System objects vortically revolve around the
barycenter
of the Solar System.” -
UVS inspired
-
See
the UVS subtopics on "The
cognitive paradox fallacy in Copernican heliocentrism",
"The
vortically manifested planetary orbitals"
that illustrates on how a planet vortically revolves and rotates
around a moving Sun, and "A
gyroscopic precession paradox" that illustrates a paradox
in the motion of two-axis rotation.
Watch
a video clip on "Earth
Rotation & Revolution around a moving Sun"
that illustrates with an external perception for the helical motion
of Earth around a moving Sun.
From
the UVS perspective, when the Earth moves toward its
perihelion[w], so at its nearest
distance from the Sun with a full moon also revolving in to
form the lunar opposition as a conjunction of the Sun, the
Earth, and the Moon, the Moon from its usual revolving path
will be pushed to a farthermost point away from the Earth.
This
is caused by the combined vortical mass effect of the Sun
and the Earth in their barycentic motions. |

1. Planet at aphelion 2. Planet at perihelion 3. Sun. [s]
|
This
is contrary to the Newton's prediction that the combined gravity
with a nearer Sun from the Earth in the conjunction will pull the
Moon from its usual revolving path to a nearest point from the Earth.
The
UVS research predicates the Moon will be at a farthermost away point
from the Earth in the lunar opposition during the perihelion of
the Earth.
And
when the Earth moves toward its aphelion[w],
so at its farthest distance from the Sun with a full moon also revolving
in to form the lunar opposition with Sun, Moon, and Earth, the Moon
from its usual revolving path will be pushed to a nearest point
to the Earth by the combined vortical mass effect of the Sun and
the Earth in their barycenter motion. This is contrary to the Newton's
prediction that the weakened effect of gravity with a farther away
Sun from the Earth in the lunar opposition will cause the Moon to
be pulled lesser by the gravity of the Sun for its usual revolving
path to a farthermost point away from the Earth.
The
UVS research predicates the Moon will be at a nearest point to the
Earth in the lunar opposition during the aphelion of the Earth.
See
video clips on "NASA
| South Up Moon Phase & Libration 2013" and "NASA
| Moon Phase and Libration South Up 2014" that show in
both years, when Earth was near perihelion in January, Moon in both
events were at a farthermost distance (near apogee) from the Earth
during the lunar oppositions, and when Earth was near aphelion in
July, Moon in both events were at a nearest distance (near perigee)
from the Earth during the lunar oppositions.
Collecting
sufficient data with empirical observation for studying lunar opposition
when these events occur near the perihelion of the Earth, can verify
these predications of the UVS research.
See
externally linked topics on "Motions
of Observable Structures Ruled by Hierarchical Two-body Gravitation
in the Universe" that quantitatively predict the orbits
of planets with a wobbling Sun that has a composite barycenter rendered
by the barycenters of its individual planets.
Based
on the UVS model, a planetary system is coalesced to form by its
stellar vortex, and it is impelled by its nested spheroidal torus
vortex that vortically encapsulates its heliosphere.
If two planetary objects are induced to revolve each other
by the stellar vortex that impels its planetary vortex, in
its inertial frame of reference, the two planetary objects
would revolve around each other in circular orbits centering
their barycenter.
From
the UVS perspective, all typically manifested spheroidal
torus vortices that spawn celestial objects, are precessing
in their two-axis spins.
Based
on unisonal
vortex mechanism[uvs], a planetary
vortex in precession would renders the elliptical orbits
with apsidal precessions for two revolving planetary
objects. The barycenter of the two revolving planetary
objects in their planetary vortex, therefore has the
mass effect of the two planetary objects combined. |

A spheroid with
two rotational axes.
|
|
|
Center
of a star evolving
nearer to a barycenter (+)
w/ a smaller evolving planet. [s] |
|
See
the UVS topic on "The
structure of galaxy" that elaborates on how the vortical
motion of a galaxy is being transferred to its star systems and
their planetary systems.
See
also "Lagrangian",
"Lagrangian
points" that elaborates on the gravitational effect on
a small object in five positions of a two-body system, "THE
CHARGE FIELD causes LAGRANGE POINTS" that elaborates on
the causality of the Lagrangian points, and "Final
Demystification of the gravitational constant variation"
that elaborates on the gravitation constant G is not a constant.
From
the UVS perspective, the elliptical orbit of a planet is caused
by the interacting vortical motion of the Sun revolving around the
BOTSS[uvs];
the orbital
eccentricity[w] of a planet is a mechanical
function of the planet, its star, and the barycenter of its planetary
system. This can coherently explain the anomaly for the "Zombie
Planet's Rogue Orbit Around Star Shocks Scientists"[m],
which the orbit of the exoplanet Fomalhaut b was inexplicable with
Newton's celestial mechanics, and therefore needs a hypothetical
exoplanet to mathematically patch the anomaly.
This
can also coherently explain the NASA's Spitzer Space Telescope observation
of
a young binary star system surrounded by "Hula Hoops"
of debris[m], which appears to be two
developing stars surrounded by wobbling disks of star-formation
residue; the debris rings and the binary star system revolve around
the barycenter of their star system.
In
the superior conjunction with the dominating barycenter of
the planetary system (BOTSS), the star and the exoplanet with
the BOTSS-star-exoplanet arrangement in an all-pervasive medium,
the exoplanet will be vortically pushed to the nearest distance
from the star.
And
in the inferior conjunction with the star-BOTSS-exoplanet
arrangement, the exoplanet will be vortically pushed to the
farthermost distance from the star.
These vortical interactions are the causalities for the elliptical
orbit of a planet as observed in the inertial reference frame
of the planetary system. For a relatively less massive star
as compared to its BOTSS, it will result in a high orbital
eccentricity for its exoplanet in its barycenter motion; the
exoplanet will have a very elliptical orbit. |

Elliptical orbit with apsidal motion.
|
In
actuality, a celestial object that swings around a mass center with
apsidal
precession[w] in elliptical orbit at its
orbital
inclination[w], is definitely abscribing
the topology[w]
of a ring torus orbital; a satellite orbit is a rendered by the
vortical motion of its torus transformed nested spheroidal vortex.
The
UVS research predicates the elliptical orbit of a planet with apsidal
precession is rendered by its vortical interactions of its star
and the barycenter of its planetary system.
See
the UVS subtopic on "The
primeval Earth and its moon" that elaborates on the ontology
of Earth and Moon, and how their orbits are vortically transferred.
“As
far as the laws of mathematics refer to reality, they are not certain,
and as far as they are certain, they do not refer to reality.”
-
Albert Einstein
“If
the equation for a universal law of physics cannot explain reality
with its mathematical construct, it is not the reality is incorrect.”
-
UVS inspired
-
“Physics
should adopt the qualitative studies of natural phenomena
as its primary discipline,
and then follow with their quantitative studies as its secondary
discipline for developing their a posteriori knowledge.”
-
UVS inspired
- |
|
.
The
hyperspherical pushed-in gravitational field
This
refers to the pushed-in gravitational force field with geometrical
interactions
that follows approximately the principle of inverse-square
law, it is with almost isotropic potential
in a geometry of
spheroidal form
that has negative pressure.
In
the UVS worldview,
a harmonics of resonated aether vortical motion impels a satellite
by push momentum to vortically revolves around the Earth in
its gravitational pressure density, and the Earth with the
vortically pushed-in satellite is perpetually revolving the
Sun, which is also perpetually revolving in vortical motion
around the Milky Way galaxy in a galactic vortical system.
Although
this hyperspherical pushed-in gravity concept of UVS
is equivalent
in principle with
the mainstream Einsteinian geometric gravity concept
of spacetime distortion, its concept of invariant space
and time filled with an aetheric medium is
fundamentally different from the relativistic covariant
spacetime[w]
distortion model. This is its paradigm shift from the
modern physics.
In
the general relativity point of view, gravity as a result
of spacetime (aether)
distortion causes Earth to fall perpetually into the
spacetime distortion of the Sun. A satellite captured
by Earth's gravity (with
its spacetime distortion) to revolve around the
Earth, is in essence falling perpetually into the spacetime
distortion of a perpetually moving away Earth. |

An
abstract of
spacetime distortion. [s] |
In
this hypothetical construct of the spacetime distortion model,
the perpetual falling Earth keeps its spiraling satellites
from not falling down to Earth.
See
the UVS topic
on "The
UVS reviews on the General Relativity concepts of gravity"
for further elaboration.
See
also an externally linked topic on "Space-time
Vortex", and "NASA
Announces Results of Epic Space-Time Experiment"
that reports on NASA had confirmed that fundamentally there
is a spacetime vortex around the Earth.
|
|
.
The
concept of hyperspherical pushed-in gravity amalgamates and unifies
In
the UVS world view, the phenomenon of gravity is caused by vortically
conserved electromagnetic forces of vortical
hypersphere of 137 nested 3-spheres[uvs], which
interacts with its encapsulated medium of aether
corpuscles[uvs] that are displaced by matters.
In
its fractals of
nested vortical hyperspheres[uvs] that are harmonically
manifested in macrocosms and microcosms, the causality for all of the
fundamental
interactions[w] are rendered by the aether
vortical motion[uvs] of the cosmos in the hyperspherical
vortex spin fusion[uvs] of the hypersphere system.
And
as a matter of fact, the Newton's
law of universal gravitation[w] that descibes
gravity as the pull-in effect of point mass, could not explain how
it modulates the Jupiter
trorans[w] and the Hildian
asteroids[w] as were being demonstrated.
In
the UVS worldview, these asteroids were pushed-in with the replusion
force of their underlying vortical hypersphere to revolve in their
ring torus orbitals that have had intrinsically manifested around
the barycenter of the Solar System. |
Trojans
and Hildas. [s] |
From
the UVS perspective,
all non-contact
forces[w] in nature are caused by the vortical
motion of an all-pervasive inviscid aetheric
medium that is confined in a nested spheroidal encapsulation; this is
the ontology for all the fundamental interactions of nature.
The
concept for spheroidal push-in gravity, is coherent for gravity in the
macrocosms, and quantum gravity in the microcosms. The energetically charged
hypersphere, is also the origin for all the three other non-contact forces
of nature, which are electromagnetic force, strong nuclear force, and
weak nuclear force.
Heuristically[w],
this unifies gravity in the macrocosms and the microcosms, as well as
amalgamates it with the three other non-contact forces of nature.
“All
non-contact forces in nature are rendered by vortical motion of
an inviscid aetheric medium that is all-pervasive in the cosmos.”
- UVS inspired
-
See
the UVS topics on "The
structure of atom" that elaborates on vortical phenomena in the
microcosms for how they are vortically impelled by the macrocosms, "The
formation of stars and galaxies" that illustrates on how all
celestial objects are vortically coalesced in the macrocosms, and "Unisonal
evolution mechanism" that elaborates on vortical evolution for
how it begets existences from the macrocosms to the microcosms.
See
also an externally linked topic on "Unified
Theory Foundations" by Blaze Labs Research based on reinstated
aether. In
its "Replacing SI with ST units" that has defined Energy is
Inverse velocity (T/S), this unifies all the measuring systems in a single
framework that in conventional wisdom are thought to be independence field
of studies in different disciplines. "What looks so unconventional
in the ST unification table is the fact that matter is a 3D version of
energy, and that energy or 1D mass, is the inverse of velocity. Once cleared
these two weird links, it becomes immediately clear that the ST table
should be the real fundamental measuring system of science.", for
example, Newton's law: F=ma=m(dv/dt); comparing with V= L(dI/dt), where
voltage has the same dimensions of force, Inductance the same dimensions
of mass and current same dimensions of velocity. "It is clear that
the equations are actually the same, and that V=L(dI/dt) is actually Newton's
law of motion." - Excerpts
from Blaze Labs Research under UTF.
~ With credits to James
Aaron Nicholson for his theory "Tiny
Bits Part I on Gravity", this has inspired that gravity mechanism
is a pushed-in effect instead of pulled-in effect.
~
With thanks to David Levi Wing (aka
dleviwing, moderator of TOEQuest forum) for
his post #404 that links a video clip on "Waves
in a Large Free Sphere of Water".
~ With thanks to Graham Burnett (aka G_burnett
of TOEQuest Forum) for
his post #406 that links a video clip on "Surface
tension of water in microgravity".
~ With thanks to
anonymous for his link on "Zombie
Planet's Rogue Orbit Around Star Shocks Scientists" that highlight
the anomaly on the orbit of an exoplanet.
Glossary:
actuality |
- |
The
quality or state of being actual or real. |
cognitive
paradox |
- |
A
category of paradox with illusions that are pertaining to perception
or awareness, such as with relative motion illusion, optical illusion,
tactile illusion and the likes. |
delusion |
- |
The
action of deluding or the state of being deluded. |
first
principle |
- |
The
first basis from which a thing is known. |
holistic |
- |
Concerned
with wholes rather than analysis or separation into parts. |
vortical
hypersphere |
- |
A
hypersphere formed with intrinsic vortical motion. |
hypothesis |
- |
A
proposition, or set of propositions, set forth as an explanation for
the occurrence of some specified group of phenomena, either asserted
merely as a provisional conjecture to guide investigation (working
hypothesis) or accepted as highly probable in the light of established
facts. |
inversed
illusion |
- |
A
peculiar type of illusion that paradoxically appears in an inverse
manner. |
macrocosm |
- |
The
great world or universe; the universe considered as a whole (opposed
to microcosm ). A representation of a smaller unit or entity by a
larger one, presumably of a similar structure. |
microcosm |
- |
A
little world; a world in miniature (opposed to macrocosm ). |
observable
universe |
- |
The
observable
segment of the universe. |
paradigm |
- |
A
set of forms all of which contain a particular element, esp. the set
of all inflected forms based on a single stem or theme. |
paradox |
- |
Any
thing, or situation exhibiting an apparently contradictory nature
with false proposition. |
spheroid |
- |
A
geometrical figure similar in shape to a sphere, such as an ellipsoid. |
theory |
- |
A
coherent group of general propositions used as principles of explanation
for a class of phenomena. |
universe |
- |
The
totality of known or supposed objects and phenomena throughout space;
the cosmos; macrocosm. It is beyond the defined observable universe. |
viscous |
- |
Having
the property of viscosity; sticky. |
Image
and animation credits:
Image
of inverse-square law - www.acousticalsurfaces.com
Diagram of a steady
state suspended air bubble - By Vincent Wee Foo
A sketch for illustrating
pushed-in gravity - By Vincent Wee Foo
Image
of elliptical orbit with apsidal motion - By Mpfiz
A
diagram for illustrating the tidal force field acting on a celestial object
- By Krishnavedala
Image
of an ellipsoid - By SpikeToronto
A
sketch of unisonal vortex - Vincent Wee-Foo
Image
of Earth in aphelion and perihelion - Pearson Scott Foresman
Image
of a two-axis digon
- By Pbroks13
Image
of elliptical orbit with apsidal motion -
By Mpfiz
Image
of Trojans and Hildas - From Wiki creative common
Image
of spacetime distortion - NASA
An animation of a 3-body
motion - By Vincent Wee Foo
Animation
of circular orbit of two boides - By Zhatt
The
classified denotations with URL links for the individual words and specific
phrases denoted in the UVS treatise:
[uvs] |
- |
A
specific UVS topic or a source from the UVS treatise. |
[g] |
- |
The
definition for the word in the glossary list of the UVS treatise. |
[d] |
- |
The
general definitions for the word from an the Internet dictionary source. |
[w]
|
- |
A
specific topic of the free encyclopedia by Wikipedia. |
[m] |
- |
A
miscellaneous Internet source. |
[s] |
- |
The
Internet source for the inserted image or animation. |
The
inception of this UVS topic was in March 2008 with ongoing updates since.
Disclaimers:
The treatise of Universal Vortical Singularity (UVS) in its epistemological
paradigm shift, is fundamentally unconventional. Its hypotheses grounded
on a generally unheard-of UVS model, bound to have shortcomings, such
as loose ends, errors, and omissions errors. Many details and assumptions
in its propositions have yet to be further researched, probed, evaluated,
validated, or verified. Its implicit explanations are for casual understanding
of the UVS topics presented in the UVS worldview, so if any term or statement
is offensive in any manner from whatsoever perspectives, is most regretted.
Links to other sites do not imply endorsement of their contents; apply
appropriate discretion whenever necessary. Also, the content of the UVS
topics, from time to time could be arbitrarily modified without any notice.
Viewing
tips: Despite the presentations of the UVS web pages has went through
much accommodation for their viewings on smart phones, they are still
not entirely friendly to these mobile devices. For the best experiences,
use a MS Windows based PC or computer system with Java enabled browser
for running its interactive applets.
(Such as Java
Applet of Moiré pattern,
JPL
Small-Body Database Browser, and
Planet
Finder.)
Copyright
information: This UVS web site is for non-profit purposes and not for
commercial use. Wherever possible, direct credits to the origins of the
works or images were provided, be it on
fair
dealings, with explicit permission from
their owners, or the materials were believed to be from the public
domain. |