Based on the UVS model, a star is vortically formed by the bipolar polar vortex pair manifested in its nested stellar spheroidal unisonal vortex, which is formed within a larger vortical system that impels its galaxy.
UVS predicates that a new star is evolved by vortically coalesced stellar clouds formed in a nested bipolar stellar vortex pair. With credits to Allen Barrow.
The newly formed star HL Tau within Milky Way as illustrated below, is still at infancy stage of its star birth with a vortically coalesced protoplanet HL Tau b (small circular bright image at slightly after one o'clock position), also is in the process of forming as a gaseous planet.
This image is based on data captured by radio telescopes, is a protoplanetary disk with a view from a polar region showing spiral arms of the evolving star HL Tau, which appears to be driving a protoplanet HL Tau b to form in the accretion disk of a "womb of gas". Prior to this simulated image, there were only artist’s impressions available for protoplanetary disc in showing the accretion disk with spiral arms.
The cognitive paradox that renders the star formation in its protoplanet as a mysterious phenomenon, was thus meticulously resolved with its underlying structure and mechanism explicated.
UVS predicates that protoplanet is formed in vortically scattered interstellar clouds in a nested satellite vortex pair on a plane of flattened nested stellar polar vortex pair of its parent star.
See externally linked on "Galaxy Cluster Spawns Stars Faster Than Any In Known Universe" that reports on stars were observed to spawn in a cluster of galaxies of an intergalactic system, and "Never-Before-Seen Stage of Planet Birth Revealed" that reports a newborn star with detailed glimpse of planets forming around it.
The grounding for its epistemic theories of truth: The underlying structure and mechanism of a star as explicated with its hypothetical construct based on the UVS model, elucidated its delusional observations that render it as a mystery. Thus, its cognitive paradox was simply dispersed, and all the related natural phenomena were then qualitatively analysed in the conceptual frameworks of UVS by inductive reasoning for explicating with their empirical evidence to predicate by abductive reasoning.
See the UVS topic on "Overviews of the UVS research" that elaborates on the grounded theory methodology for the evaluations of natural phenomena.
Note: The concept for cosmic evolution with a vortical system in the UVS worldview, was developed without prior knowledge to Rene Descartes and his "Theory of Vortices". It was wonderful to know later that a similar vortical concept of Solar System evolution was studied in-depth in the past. The Cartesian cosmology based on a vortex model that has had been forsaken for more than two centuries, was once championed in France for nearly one hundred years in the later part of the seventeenth century.
Based on the UVS model, the protoplanetary disk of its protostar is driven by its nested polar vortrex pair, and it is formed by its reversed pushing-out vortical motion. The pair of nested vortrexes are impelled by the nested pair of polar vortices, and the vortical momentum can levitate the swirling plasmatic interstellar materials in its pair of folded back nested vortrexes.
UVS predicates that protoplanetary disk is a vortrex with glowing plasma and it is impelled by the vortical column of its protostar.
UVS predicates that stellar jet is vortically formed in a polar vortex column with an ionized jet of gas stream vortically culminated in its spheroidal unisonal vortex. With credit to Anna Lorrina Mitchell.
Note: Stellar jets, or accretion disk jets, is one of the unsolved problems in physics.
See an externally linked topic on "Space tornado" that evidently illustrates the vortical dynamics of a stellar jet observed with NASA's Spitzer infrared telescope.
Based on the UVS model, a star is impelled by its galactic vortex to vortically form with coalesced stellar materials in a nested bipolar stellar vortex pair manifested in its nested spheroidal unisonal vortex.
The cognitive paradox that renders the misconception for the motion of the Sun, was thus meticulously resolved with its underlying structure and mechanism explicated.
UVS predicates that Sun is impelled by its galactic vortex to rotate and revolve around the Galactic Center in a perpetual vortical motion.
As a matter of fact, star was empirically observed to be vortically formed by coalescing stellar materials in its stellar vortex, also the Solar System has been empirically observed to be encapsulated by the heliosphere, and Sun is merely a typical star, which infers a typical star is also encapsulated by its heliosphere. It is also qualitatively proven in the UVS worldview that the Sun is being impelled by its galactic vortex to rotate and revolve around the Galactic Center, and indubitably the orbits of planets are vortical motions. These collaboratively are the qualitative proof for star is impelled by its galactic vortex to vortically form in its nested spheroidal unisonal vortex.
UVS qualitatively predicts that star is impelled by its galactic vortex to vortically form with coalesced stellar materials in a nested bipolar stellar vortex pair manifested in its nested spheroidal unisonal vortex.
See an externally linked topic on "The Universal Helicola" that presents an impeccable illustration for spiral motion of Earth's path in space on page 269 in figure 13.1, it was elaborated qualitatively, analytically and quantitatively.
See the UVS topic on "Sunspot" that elucidates on more than twenty mysterious phenomena of the Sun.
UVS predicates that satellite galaxy is induced by satellite galactic vortex of a main galactic vortex.
“Local physical laws are determined by the large-scale structure of the universe.” - Mach's principle
In the UVS worldview, on higher vortical orders of its vortical paradigm at macro levels of a vortical universe, its universal vortical systems unisonally consolidate galaxy clusters, galaxy superclusters and the ever larger vortical structures beyond. On lower vortical orders at micro levels there are vortically weaved atoms, subatomic particles and the ever smaller vortical structures within. The UVS model can universally unite the mechanism of the largest structures with the mechanism of the smallest structures in the observable universe.
See an externally linked topic on "Galaxy Cluster Spawns Stars Faster Than Any In Known Universe", this scientific observation is a strong evidence for the existence of an intergalactic spheroidal vortex system that spawns stars, and then systematically coalesced them in a cluster of galaxies.
From the UVS perspective, a nested intergalactic spheroidal vortex that encapsulates an energetic blob of gas, is an active plasmasphere that would vortically spawn stars in their galaxies within a galaxy cluster. The intergalactic spheroidal vortices with their galaxy clusters, are vortically coalesced as a supercluster of galaxy clusters, and this supercluster is held in between a cluster of supervoids, which vortically impels the supercluster to spawn stars and coalesce them in a grand vortical system.
See the UVS subtopics on "Nested spheroids of nature" that illustrates various types of nested spheroidal unisonal vortices, and "The structure of an elliptical galaxy" that illustrates a galactic spheroid unisonal vortex.
Based on the UVS model, a satellite galaxy is induced and coalesced by its satellite galactic vortex.
In the UVS worldview, satellite galaxies such as the NGC 5195 (the companion of M51), the Large Magellanic Cloud, the Sagittarius Dwarf Elliptical Galaxy, the Canis Major dwarf galaxy, and the Messier 80 globular cluster, were vortically formed by their satellite galactic vortices, which are being impelled by their host galactic vortex.
See the UVS topic on "Globular cluster" that elaborates on how a globular cluster could be vortically transformed.
From the UVS perspective, a satellite galaxy is being ripped with its stars being snatched by its host galaxy that has spread it out in a long stellar stream, is as a result of a dissipating satellite galactic vortex affected by cyclonic gravity field effect of the galactic spheroid that is driving the galactic vortex; the satellite galaxy would appeared to have been ripped. These phenomena can also be described as an effect of the dissipating satellite galactic vortex is in a process of merging into the main galactic vortex, or the vortical forces holding the stars is being overpowered by an external vortical force of another larger galaxy system on its near encounter.
UVS predicates that the ripping of a galaxy is caused by the cyclonic gravity field effect from another larger galaxy system on near encounter.
The effects of a satellite galactic vortex that could aggregate stars in a satellite galaxy, is rendered by the vortical spin fusion of its nested spheroidal vortex to push in on the repulsing surfaces of the nested plasmatic shell of adjacent stars, and this would cause their outer plasmatic shells to merge by the process of magnetic reconnection; in a manner this is similar to chemical covalent bond of a molecule.
If its host galaxy snatches these vortically consolidated stars that are closely packed, they would then revolve by spiraling around the host galaxy as a star cluster that spiral to revolve as a group of stars, or as a binary star system with two stars, and each group of these reconsolidated stars share a common plasmatic shell.
UVS predicates that binary stars are revolving around each other in a common plasmatic shell that was merged from the plasmatic shells of the two stars.
These reconsolidated stars are encapsulated in their common spheroidal unisonal vortex, and they vortically revolve around their barycenter of mass. These suggests that a star cluster is held together by strong interactions from electromagnetic vortices of stars in the weak vortical interactions of their common galactic vortex.
UVS predicates that star cluster is held together by strong interactions from electromagnetic vortices of stars in the weak vortical interactions of their common galactic vortex.
From the UVS perspective, these interacting galaxies apparently are separated in a dual-core galactic vortex; each of these galaxies was manifested in one of the cores of a dual-core galactic vortex.
Based on unisonal vortex mechanism, the intensified galactic vortex interactions of an intergalactic spheroid would cause the phenomenon of interacting galaxies. An increase in intensity of the two intergalactic polar vortices within an intergalactic spheroid had somehow occurred in an intergalactic precession, and this could cyclically intensify the intergalactic polar vortices pair. At one end on the interacting galaxies side (ESO 350-40A), the intensified galactic polar vortex would intensify this satellite galactic vortex to impel its interacting companion galaxy to resonate on a tilted axis of their encapsulating intergalactic spheroid.
If this hypothesis of UVS for the almost instantaneous reactions on the vortical structure that held the Cartwheel Galaxy with a span of 150,000 light-years across is true, then the belief that nothing with mass can travel faster than the speed of light is a myth.
From the UVS perspective, with its very intensified vortical gravitational singularity that would have had formed its supermassive black hole, its circulating process can result in incessantness and nuclear transmutation to form all types of heavier chemical element as it possibly could, and then vortically scatter them around its galactic spheroid.
See an externally linked topic on "What Is A Quasar" that elucidates on quasar, radio galaxy, and lazar were perceived as different types of celestial object in the past, is as a result of the orientation of their polarized stellar jets.
UVS predicates that quasar is a resonated satellite galaxy impelled by a significant harmonic of its encapsulating nested galactic spheroid. Inspired in a forum discussion with Allen Barrow.
In the UVS world view, stars in a stellar arm driven towards the rim on a furrow as a result of centrifugal force, are caught to be embedded by its vortical interaction in its galactic system .
From the UVS perspective, when a star is dislodged from inside a galactic vortex ring that spins it cyclonically, and thus was moved to the outside of the galactic vortex ring, it would be subjected to an anti-cyclonic spin. The star in a spiral stellar arm could become dislodged from its embedment when the satellite galactic vortex impelling it is dissipating, or when its escape velocity is somehow overcome.
The dislodged star would therefore encounter a vortical driving force impelling it in an opposite direction of its intrinsic vortical spin, it thus undergoes the torque-induced precession in the vortical spiral arm to intrinsically spin it in opposite directions. This vortical interactions would cause the dislodged star to slow down gradually in rotating speed and then becomes cooler as a result of the dynamo effect is being gradually reduced.
UVS predicates that supernova is caused in an unwinding process with a harmonic aetheric vortex to impel the star to violently spin in opposed directions.
UVS predicates that red giant star is vortically unwound to expand and expel its materials. With credit to anonymous from Singapore.
See the UVS subtopic on "A thought experiment to simulate the hyperspheric pushed-in gravity with a huge balloon held in deep ocean" that elaborates on a thought experiment to simulate how red giant and supernova could manifest.
See an external linked topic on "Flux tube and plasma torus" that reports on charged particles spewed from Jupiter Moon Io had formed a gigantic Io Plasma Torus collection of particles, which orbit in the orbital of Jupiter.
The scattered remnants of the diffused star that were vortically impelled in opposite direction by the spiral arm of the galaxy would then begin to consolidate with heavier elements of star stuff in its opposite spin. This vortical consolidating process in the opposite spin would gradually consolidate the expelled star stuff to consolidate again in its evolution process that could form another generation of enriched stars, planets and their satellites.
From the UVS perspective, a highly energetic spinor field that undulates a star in its nova outburst, could impel the electrostatically encapsulated ionized atoms to exchange electrons with galactic wind, and emits x-ray and gamma-ray from the energized star.
UVS predicates that a star nova outburst of x-ray and gamma ray is caused by a highly energetic spinor field that underlies the star.
See the UVS subtopics on "Cometary outburst" that elaborates on how the coma of a comet could release x-ray with its underlying spheroidal unisonal vortex, and "The structures of planetary nebulae" that illustrates all sorts of vortical pattern for nebulae.
See an externally linked topic on "Supermassive Black Hole Devouring a Star" that elaborates on an observed star shredded and unwound by its black hole would become a red giant, "Supermassive Black Hole’s Dizzying Spin Is Half The Speed Of Light", "How black holes both consume and eject material", "Star being shredded by a massive black hole", "ALMA reveals secrets of a dying star", "Hubble Telescope reveals true shape of Ring Nebula" that reveals an unprecedented view of the nebula's three-dimensional nested torus-shaped structure with spokes, "Hyper-velocity star" that evidently suggest a star achieving escape velocity and therefore dislodges from its main galaxy would end up in a supernova explosion, and the mainstream hypotheses for "Nebular hypothesis" and "Stellar evolution" .
Note: Supernova is one of the unsolved problems in physics, and White dwarfs are known to have a low rate of rotation before it undergoes a Type Ia supernova that explodes via the accretion mechanism to unbind the star in a supernova explosion.
Note: The contemplation for supernova explosion was speculated based on unisonal vortex mechanism, and as yet there was no direct evidence found for changing spinning direction of any star that was involved with supernova; the conjectures were merely based on the UVS model with the observed evidence of hyper-velocity star would end up in supernova explosion, and a shredded star unwound by its black hole would become a red giant. UVS model propositioned that supernova is typically caused in an unwinding process by vortically impelling the star to violently spin in opposite direction. If a known star such as Betelgeuse with known details went supernova, and if its supposedly neutron star after the supernova is observed to be spinning at high speed in opposite direction, this would be the initial scientific proof for this claim of UVS on supernova.
From the UVS perspective, the brightness of a star depends on electric current generated by the dynamo effect in magnetohydrodynamics (MHD) of its vortically culminated plasma that causes ionized matter to glow; electric glow discharge.
From the classical mechanics viewpoint, a particle with mass if impelled in vortical motion would produce kinetic energy that could be converted into electrical energy for the process of electric glow discharge.
Note: A MHD dynamo has three requirements - a conducting viscous matter, rotation, and convection.
In the UVS worldview, a galactic vortex can spawn its satellite vortex with higher spinning speed in their differential rotations, and its dynamo effect of intensified aether vortical motion in a vortical gravitational singularity, can cause protoplanetary disks to evolve by the vortical consolidation of interstellar clouds with their precession effects of two-axis spin, and then they are ignited to glow as stars by their resonated dynamo effects.
UVS predicates that star is vortically ignited to glow by the dynamo effect of magnetohydrodynamics in a resonated harmonic of vortical gravitational singularity.
In a freely suspended state, the resonated interstellar materials are vortically consolidated as spinning mass of glowing plasma within a nested spheroidal unisonal vortex; a newly spawned planetary system is vortically fused by vortical motion acting on spheroidally resonated interstellar clouds that spiral in the galactic vortex. Impelled by swirling motion of the galactic vortex, the vortically evolved star and planetary systems coalesced with interstellar materials, are vortically consolidated as a glowing galaxy with satellite galaxies.
All sources of radiation for galaxy clusters, galaxies, stars, novae, supernovae, planetary nebulae and satellites are manifested from vortical motion of aether in nested spheroidal encapsulations.
See a UVS subtopics on "Comet outburst event" that elaborates on the natural electric glow discharge of comets.
From the UVS perspective, in the vortical spin fusion neclosnythesis process of a star, the nucleons in the hydrogen atoms could fuse to create heavier elements, and also the brightness of a star that is vortically impelled and does not depend on the amount of nuclear fuel available for the star to burn. It primarily depends on its precession effects from its two-axis rotation that causes torque-free precession for vortical motion of its viscous matter to heat up and light up the star.
UVS predicates that the brightness of star depends on electric current generated by dynamo effect in magnetohydrodynamics of vortically consolidated plasma.
The high speed spin of plasma jet streams in vortical motion within the corona, could qualitatively explain why the corona is much hotter than the surface of the Sun with tightly packed photosphere that has much limited degree of freedom for motion; kinetic energy of plasma jet streams with vortical motion in high speed spin within the corona are converted to excessive heat.
UVS predicates that the immense heat in corona of the Sun is produced by vortical motion of plasma jet streams with high speed spin by converting kinetic energy into heat.
Evidently, the vortical system of interstellar cloud in a vortical oneness has consolidated further to manifest unisonal vortices in unison within the star, its planets and their moons, in forms such as sunspot clusters on photosphere of the Sun, planetary cloud bands and planetary storms on nested atmosphere of gaseous planet.
From the UVS perspective, volcanic activities on satellites (planets and moons are satellites) with stratified surfaces, are caused by forced vortices of mantle sphere. The various types of vortices are spawned as a result of torque-free precession manifested in different nested layers of viscous matter, are caused by torque-induced precession in the vortical system.
Thermal radiation from the interior of a planet and its satellites is generated by vortical motion in nested layers of viscous matter with precession effect.
UVS predicates that thermal radiation from the interior of a planet and its satellites is generated by vortical motion in nested layers of viscous matter with precession effect.
Based on the UVS model, a planetary system is vortically coalesced by its stellar spheroidal unisonal vortex, and this is impelled by its galactic spheroidal unisonal vortex.
In the UVS worldview, the Solar System was formed in a planetary vortical system that has had manifested in the galactic vortical system, which has had formed the Milky Way.
UVS predicates that the Solar System is formed in a vortical planetary system that has had manifested in the galactic vortical system of the Milky Way.
Solar System was formed in a vortical planetary system that
From the UVS perspective, a vortically consolidated planet after "clearing the neighborhood", vortically propagates around a transformed vortex ring with the transferred angular momentum conserved from the vortical motion of the coalesced nebulous materials.
From the galactic reference frame, it can be visualized that the motion of the Earth is transferred from the vortical motion of its galaxy; the Earth is impelled to vortically revolve around the Sun that is also vortically impelled to revolve around the Galactic Center.
All orbits are manifested with the vortical motion resonants of their nested spheroidal unisonal vortices.
UVS predicates that the orbitals of natural satellites are developed with the conserved angular momentum transferred from a nested bipolar vortex pair.
See the UVS topics on "Heliosphere" that illustrates on how are planetary orbits formed, "A comparative analysis of the Solar System with the UVS atomic model" that illustrates on the vortical orbitals of the Solar System and the UVS atomic model, and "The cognitive paradox fallacy in Copernican heliocentrism" that reviews the conventional widsom of planetary orbit.
It is a scientific fact that the Sun spirals to revolve around the barycenter of the Solar System. This is as a result of the Sun is exchanging angular momentum primarily with Jupiter, and also with all other Sun's satellites while the Sun moves.
It is believed that the Sun revolves by spiraling around the Galactic Center of the Milky Way galaxy at the velocity of approximately 232 km/s and it takes around 230 million years to make one revolving cycle. In the external reference frame of the Milky Way galaxy, the Sun as a matter of fact is moving in a composite helical path around the Galactic Center; this infers the motion of the Sun is primarily impelled by the vortical motion of its galaxy.
The motion of the Solar System is a vortical motion transferred from the vortical motion of the Milky Way galaxy, and the Solar System is being coalesced in a resonated vortical motion with stellar materials. This elucidates that the helical motions of Solar System objects are manifested by the vortical motion of the Solar System. Any two celestial objects revolving around each other with their barycenter vortically moving through space, will spiral in helical motions with precession effects.
With this transcendental visualization, one can comprehensively understand that all the manifested orbitals of celestial objects, are developed as a result of conserved angular momentum transferred from the vortical dynamics of a primordial nested spheroidal vortex.
In its epistemic process that is substantiated with empirical observations, UVS predicates that the Solar System was manifested by the vortical spin fusion of interstellar clouds in the resonant frequencies of standing waves, and they are vortically propagating in longitudinal waves.
UVS predicates that the Solar System objects were manifested by vortical spin fusion of interstellar clouds in resonant frequencies of standing wave and they are vortically propagating in longitudinal waves.
The superpositioning of two significant centrifugal forces of the dual-core planetary system in precession, renders the elliptical and apsidal motions of planets with two focal points in its manifested accretion disk.
From the UVS perspective, the Sun and its planets are perpetually spiraling toward the center of the Solar System that is also perpetually moving away with vortical motion in its helical path in the galactic reference frame. This renders the phenomenon of planetary orbits with apsidal and elliptical motions that are precessing in the localized reference frame of a static Sun.
With this cognitive paradox meticulously resolved in its transcendental perspective, it construes as a qualitative proof that the orbitals of celestial objects were developed as a result of their systematically conserved angular momentums, which are transferred from the resonated vortical motions of their underlying nested spheroidal vortices.
See externally linked topics on "The Universal Helicola", and "Motions of Observable Structures Ruled by Hierarchical Two-body Gravitation in the Universe" for some proposed mathematical models on revolving celestial objects.
See the UVS topics on "Unisonal evolution mechanism" that elaborates on this vortical dynamics, "Aetheric jet stream" that elaborates on the particle paths of Earth's magnetic field lines. See an externally linked topic on "The Universal Helicola" that presents an impeccable illustration for spiral motion of Earth's path in space on page 269 in figure 13.1, which was comprehensively elaborated qualitatively, analytically and quantitatively.
See also video clips on "Earth Rotation & Revolution around a moving Sun" that illustrates with an external perception for the helical motion of Earth in a moving Sun, and "The solar system's motion thru space". Note: These illustrations would be qualitatively more accurate if they show the barycenter motion of a moving Sun that propagates in a composite helical path around the Galactic Center.
The orbital resonance of planets and satellites in Solar System with orbiting bodies that exert gravitational influence on each other has mutual precession effects acting on each other in a cyclical manner.
From the UVS perspective, the apsidal precession of planets is an empirical evidence for the spiral motion of a moving Sun in its revolving path around the Galactic Center. For its comparative analysis, Jupiter can be perceived to be vortically spiraling around the Sun and it is wobbling around a composite center of mass as a result of its moons.
Note: The vortical paths in helical spiral motion of planets were independently visualized with the UVS model without any priori reference, other similar concepts were later found through the Internet on further inquiry, such as "Spiral Forms in Space" as illustrated by Dr. Wilhelm Reich (MD) in the web site of Dr. James DeMeo, Ph.D., "Universal Helicola" as illustrated by Dr. Vladimir Ginzburg and "The solar system's motion thru space"as illustrated by Nassim Haramein. Nonetheless, among these similar illustrations, UVS uniquely illustrated with scientific evidence for how the Sun and its planets were vortically formed, why they propagate in spiral motions through space and how they were vortically impelled to move in spiral motion.
If a planet is cyclonically rotating in counter-clockwise direction at an angular speed slower than the counter-clockwise angular speed of its cyclonic revolving path, from the Sun's perspective, the planet would be deemed as rotating in clockwise direction. It is paradoxically rotating in clockwise direction in the frame of reference from the Sun's perspective, this is as a result of its counter-clockwise angular speed is rotating slower than the counter-clockwise angular speed revolving around the Sun; this paradoxically renders the optical illusion that Venus is rotating in clockwise direction in its counter-clockwise revolving path.
If Venus is in retrograde rotation at all, it should take less than the approximately 224.7 days for its sidereal rotation period in its apparently perceived retrograde rotation; this is not the case. Critically, the apparently perceived retrograde rotation of Venus is a relative motion illusion rendered in its observational delusion.
In its transcendental perspective, Venus is cyclonically rotating in counter-clockwise direction in the Solar System reference frame with prograde motion. The cognitive paradox was thus meticulously resolved with its delusional observation elucidated.
UVS predicates that Venus is cyclonically rotating in counter-clockwise direction in its counter-clockwise revolving path around the Sun. Inspired in a forum discussion with Graham Burnett.
It is a fact that Venus takes approximately 243 days for its apparently perceived retrograde rotation (or approximately -243 days for its sidereal rotation period) , while it takes approximately 224.7 days to revolve around the Sun; Venus is rotating away in counter-clockwise direction with prograde motion. The fact that Venus rotates in counter-clockwise direction in its counter-clockwise revolving path around the Sun, as can be empirically observed from the external perspective of the Solar System, is a qualitative proof that Venus is cyclonically rotating with prograde motion.
Note: The negative sign for the sidereal rotation period of Venus, is merely a symbolic indication for its apparently perceived retrograde motion.
Based on the UVS model, the Earth with its moon in their primeval molten forms are coalesced from a local vortical group of interstellar clouds formed as a nested torus-shaped ring, and this ring was impelled by the stellar vortex of the Solar System to vortically revolve around the Sun. This nested torus-shaped vortical ring of interstellar clouds with precession effect vortically consolidate higher density materials toward its core, and vortically spreads lighter density materials toward its rim in their closed streamline. This hypothesis explains why the materials on Moon coalesced with the interstellar clouds in a satellite vortex carrying a spectrum of lighter density materials, is similar to the composition of Earth; the Moon could be evolved in the same nested vortical system in which the Earth was evolved from.
See the UVS topic on "Jet streams" that elaborates on how an atmospheric jet stream in closed streamline is manifested by its underlying free vortex.
After the torus-shaped ring of interstellar clouds is compressed to a compact region in the ring with the vortical spin fusion resonated from its precession effect, it renders the effects of clearing the neighborhood, and thus coalesced the interstellar materials in the torus-shaped ring to form as a spheroidal Earth in its most efficiently balanced form. A vortically manifested torus-shaped ring that formed around the Earth and had also compressed to a compact region in its ring, had thus coalesced with the accreted interstellar materials to form as the Moon.
In this hypothesis, the Moon is vortically consolidated from a torus-shaped vortical ring of stellar materials that revolves in the vortical system of the primordial Earth, and its vortical mechanism could also explain why the sidereal rotation of Moon is tidally locked to Earth. The primordial Earth consolidated from stellar materials in its vortical ring that spiral to revolve around the Sun results in the rotating direction and the angular speed for the sidereal rotation of Earth.
UVS predicates that the primeval Earth with its Moon is vortically coalesced from a nested torus-shaped vortical ring of stellar materials formed around the Sun.
Note: Although further illustrations would be necessary to clarify this vortical mechanism, contemplating on the UVS model could elucidate this concept.
From the UVS perspective, most craters on Earth and Moon could be the remnants of molten matter vortices that were formed before they were stratified; unisonal vortex mechanism can explain the numerous crater formations on primeval Earth and primeval Moon. In geological time, Earth has a viscous mantle sphere underneath its crust, and therefore vortices of liquefied crust could still be an ongoing process that occasionally would intensify as a result of a strong Solar System alignment effect.
The lunar surface is marred with numerous craters laced in basalt materials are evident that these are remnants of vortices of liquefied crust. The surface of Earth is also marred with numerous craters in packs that are visible from space. Examine satellite image of Earth closely would reveal countless big and small craters by the hundreds all over the world, visible on main lands and sea beds as well.
See an externally linked topic on "Crater Map" powered by Geology.com that could show Earth is marred with numerous craters in packs.
In comparative studies, the gaseous surfaces of Jupiter and Saturn are laced with packed vortices that are still active, many of their moons are also marred with numerous craters in packs. Beneath the stratified surface for some of these moons such as Io, vortices of liquefied crust are supposedly still active, and therefore could manifest as volcanic activities and periodical earthquakes.
See a paper on "Jupiter and Io Observe Each Other" that suggests moon Io undergoes tides and earthquakes on a 42-hour cycle as it orbits Jupiter.
In the above thermal image of Saturn, literally hundreds of storm clouds encircle the pole, appearing as dark spots in this infrared spectrometer thermal image; these are vortically induced swirling motion that were manifested on the surfaces of its gaseous atmospheric layers.
From the UVS perspective, the Earth and its moon in their primeval molten forms would have been laced with molten satellite vortices similar to the gas giants, and after becoming stratified these vortices then became the craters as their remnants.
Based on the UVS model, Sun is coalesced by its stellar vortex, which is vortically impelled by its spheroidal unisonal vortex. In precession cylces, the Sun in barycenter motion exchanges angular momentum with all stuff encapsulate in the spheroidal unisonal vortex.
In the UVS worldview, the uniformly spread out comets revolving around the Sun in tilted elliptical orbits from the invariable plane, are formed by vortical consolidation of stellar materials in the harmonics of a spheroidal unisonal vortex with its two-axis spin.
UVS predicates that comets in Oort cloud revolving around Sun in uniformly spread out manner are vortically consolidated in harmonics of unisonal vortex.
have often made the hypothesis that ultimately physics will not require
a mathematical statement,
~ With special thanks to Allen Barrow (aka PoPpAScience of TOEQuest Forum) for his post #135 on protoplanet HL Tau b, this is strong scientific evidence for the vortical formation of stars and planets, and this image has important implications in many aspects for Universal Vortical Singularity. It is the missing link in factual astronomy observation as evidence that completes the vortical universe worldview of Universal Vortical Singularity; this is a critical piece of evidence for the unisonal vortical interactions that forms a chain of celestial object formations from a galaxy system to its star systems and planetary systems in a unisonal motion of a universal vortical system.
~ With special thanks to Graham Burnett (aka G_burnett of TOEQuest Forum) for his post on hyper-velocity star that evidently suggest a star achieving escape velocity and therefore dislodge from its main galaxy would end up in a supernova explosion.
~ With special thanks to Graham Burnett for his intellectual interactions on magnetism, magnet pole reversal of Earth and magnetosphere of Uranus. The discussion has also led to reveal on the apparent retrograde rotation of Venus is actually rotating cyclonically in counter-clockwise direction similar to other planets in the Solar System.
~ With special thanks to Anna Lorrina Mitchell (aka labelwench of TOEQuest) for her post #727 linking to "Space tornado" that evidently illustrates the vortical dynamics of a stellar jet observed with NASA's Spitzer infrared telescope.
~ With special thanks to Professor Christopher W. Hodshire from Western Michigan University for his email on highlighting a link on "Galaxy Cluster Spawns Stars Faster Than Any In Known Universe". In the UVS worldview, this is strong scientific evidence for the existence of an intergalactic spheroidal vortex system that vortically spawn stars, and then these stars vortically coalesced as a cluster of galaxies.
With special thanks to anonymous from Singapore for his email on highlighting
a link on "Supermassive
Black Hole’s Dizzying Spin Is Half The Speed Of Light",
reveals secrets of a dying star"
that evidently illustrates the spiral structure of the red giant star
R Sculptoris, the reports on "Never-Before-Seen
Stage of Planet Birth Revealed",
Telescope reveals true shape of Ring Nebula"
that reveals an unprecedented view of the nebula's three-dimensional nested
torus-shaped structure with spokes.
Some resonated remarks received that are relevant to this UVS topic on "The formation of stars and galaxies":
loved reading your research again. It does make me rethink and in some
cases, relearn my understanding of the cosmos.”
(28th Aug 2012)
intriguing website full of enlightening concepts and analyses!”
speaking, even in its present mostly qualitative form, UVS makes a significant
contribution to the discovery of spiral nature of the universe. No person
holds a complete truth about the nature of the universe, and UVS brings
attention of scientists to an interesting path of solving this very challenging
great respect, Vladimir.”
is the future of science.”
19th June 2007
Disclaimers: The treatise of Universal Vortical Singularity (UVS) in its epistemological paradigm shift, is fundamentally unconventional. Its hypotheses based on a generally unheard-of UVS model, bound to have shortcomings, such as loose ends, errors, and omissions errors. Many details and assumptions in its propositions have yet to be further researched, probed, evaluated, validated, or verified. Its implicit explanations are for casual understanding of the UVS topics presented in the UVS worldview, so if any term or statement is offensive in any manner or from whatsoever perspectives, is most regretted. Links to other sites do not imply endorsement of their contents; apply appropriate discretion whenever necessary. Remarks: Despite the shortcomings, it was intended to offer readers the drift of the UVS research methodology for its insights, and thereby the experts in their relevant fields could refine or improve on the UVS topics.
Viewing tips: Despite the presentations of the UVS web pages has went through much accommodation for their viewings on smart phones, they are not very friendly to smaller low resolution mobile devices. It is therefore recommended to access and view the UVS contents with a system device that at least has a larger high definition screen, such as a larger smart phone, an android tablet, or an iPad. For the best experiences, use a MS Windows based PC or computer system to browse with Internet Explorer or Mozilla Firefox that is Java enabled for its interactive applets. (Such as Java Applet of Moiré pattern, JPL Small-Body Database Browser, and Planet Finder.)
Copyright information: This UVS web site is for non-profit purposes and not for commercial use. Wherever possible, direct credits to the origins of the works or images were provided, be it on fair dealings, with explicit permission from their owners, or the materials were believed to be from the public domain.