Based on the UVS model, a star is vortically formed by the the bipolar polar vortex pair manifested in its nested stellar spheroidal unisonal vortex, which is formed within a larger vortical system that impels its galaxy.
UVS predicates that a new star is evolved by vortically coalesced stellar clouds formed in a nested bipolar stellar vortex pair. With credits to Allen Barrow.
The newly formed star HL Tau within Milky Way as illustrated below, is still at infancy stage of its star birth with a vortiacally coalesced protoplanet HL Tau b (small circular bright image at slightly after one o'clock position), also is in the process of forming as a gaseous planet.
This image is based on data captured by radio telescopes, is a protoplanetary disk with a view from a polar region showing spiral arms of the evolving star HL Tau that appears to be driving a protoplanet HL Tau b to form in the accretion disk with a "womb of gas". Prior to this simulated image there were only artist’s impressions available for protoplanetary disc in showing the accretion disk with spiral arms.
The cognitive paradox that renders the star formation in its protoplanet as a mysterious phenomenon, was thus meticulously resolved with its underlying structure and mechanism explicated.
See an externally linked topics on "Never-Before-Seen Stage of Planet Birth Revealed" that reports a newborn star with detailed glimpse of planets forming around it.
system formed from gigantic whirlpool within a universal fluid
The grounding for its epistemic theories of truth: The underlying structure and mechanism of a star as explicated with its hypothetical construct based on the UVS model, elucidated its delusional observations that render it as a mystery. Thus, its cognitive paradox was simply dispersed, and all the related natural phenomena were then qualitatively analysed in the conceptual frameworks of UVS by inductive reasoning for explicating with their empirical evidence to establish their qualitative predictions with abductive reasoning.
Note: The concept of cosmic evolution through a vortical system in the UVS worldview was developed without prior knowledge to Rene Descartes and his "Theory of Vortices", it has been wonderful to know later that a similar vortical concept of Solar System evolution was studied in-depth in the past. This Cartesian cosmology based on a vortex model has been forsaken for more than two centuries was once championed in France for nearly one hundred years in the later part of the seventeenth century. Modern technology for astronomy observation is only beginning to uncover the phenomena of a star system and their planetary systems evolution in the exact manners as with the qualitatively prediction made above by this long forgotten great thinker of the late Renaissance period.
Based on the UVS model, the protoplanetary disk of its protostar is driven by its nested polar vortrex pair, and it is formed by its reversed pushing-out vortical motion. The pair of nested vortrexes are impelled by the nested pair of polar vortices, and the vortical momentum can levitate the swirling plasmatic interstellar materials in its pair of folded back nested vortrexes.
UVS predicates that protoplanetary disk is a vortrex with glowing plasma and it is impelled by the vortical column of its protostar.
UVS predicates that stellar jet is vortically formed in a polar vortex column with an ionized jet of gas stream vortically culminated in its spheroidal unisonal vortex. With credit to Anna Lorrina Mitchell.
Note: Stellar jets, or accretion disk jets, is one of the unsolved problems in physics.
See an externally linked topic on "Space tornado" that evidently illustrates the vortical dynamics of a stellar jet observed with NASA's Spitzer infrared telescope.
Based on the UVS model, a star is impelled by its galactic vortex to vortically form with coalesced stellar materials in a nested bipolar stellar vortex pair manifested in its nested spheroidal unisonal vortex.
The cognitive paradox that renders the misconception for the motion of the Sun, was thus meticulously resolved with its underlying structure and mechanism explicated.
UVS predicates that Sun is impelled by its galactic vortex to rotate and revolve around the Galactic Center in a perpetual vortical motion.
As a matter of fact, star was empirically observed to be vortically formed by coalescing stellar materials in its stellar vortex, also the Solar System has been empirically observed to be encapsulated by the heliosphere, and Sun is merely a typical star, which infers a typical star is also encapsulated by its heliosphere. It is also qualitatively proven in the UVS worldview that the Sun is being impelled by its galactic vortex to rotate and revolve around the Galactic Center, and indubitably the orbits of planets are vortical motions. These collaboratively are the qualitative proof for star is impelled by its galactic vortex to vortically form in its nested spheroidal unisonal vortex.
UVS qualitatively predicts that star is impelled by its galactic vortex to vortically form with coalesced stellar materials in a nested bipolar stellar vortex pair manifested in its nested spheroidal unisonal vortex.
See an externally linked topic on "The Universal Helicola" that presents an impeccable illustration for spiral motion of Earth's path in space on page 269 in figure 13.1, it was elaborated qualitatively, analytically and quantitatively.
See a UVS topic on "Sunspot" that elucidates on more than twenty mysterious phenomena of the Sun.
UVS predicates that satellite galaxy is induced by satellite galactic vortex of a main galactic vortex.
“Local physical laws are determined by the large-scale structure of the universe.” - Mach's principle
In the UVS worldview, on higher vortical orders of its vortical paradigm at macro levels of a vortical universe, its universal vortical systems unisonally consolidate galaxy clusters, galaxy superclusters and the ever larger vortical structures beyond. On lower vortical orders at micro levels there are vortically weaved atoms, subatomic particles and the ever smaller vortical structures within. The UVS model can universally unite the mechanism of the largest structures with the mechanism of the smallest structures in the observable universe.
See an externally linked topic on "Galaxy Cluster Spawns Stars Faster Than Any In Known Universe", this is a scientific observation for the existence of a Cosmic Spheroid that vortically spawn stars and then coalesced them as a cluster of galaxies. It also demonstrates that information within a very huge vortical structure can be communicated at superluminal speed.
From the UVS perspective, a nested Cosmic Spheroid that encapsulates an energetic blob of gas, is an active plasmasphere that would vortically spawn stars in their galaxies within a galaxy cluster. The Cosmic Spheroids with their galaxy clusters are vortically coalesced as a supercluster of galaxy clusters, and this supercluster levitates on its supervoid, which vortically impels the supercluster to spawn stars and coalesce them in a grand vortical system.
See a UVS subtopic on "Nested spheroids of nature" that illustrates various types of nested spheroidal unisonal vortices.
Based on the UVS model, a satellite galaxy is induced and coalesced by its satellite galactic vortex.
In the UVS worldview, satellite galaxies such as NGC 5195 (the companion of M51), Large Magellanic Cloud, Sagittarius Dwarf Elliptical Galaxy, Canis Major dwarf galaxy , and dwarf galaxies alike are levitated on satellite galactic vortices impelled by their host galactic vortex.
From the UVS perspective, a satellite galaxy is being ripped with its stars being snatched by its host galaxy that has spread it out in a long stellar stream, is as a result of a dissipating satellite galactic vortex affected by cyclonic gravity field effect of the galactic spheroid that is driving the galactic vortex; the satellite galaxy would appeared to have been ripped. These phenomena can also be described as an effect of the dissipating satellite galactic vortex is in a process of merging into the main galactic vortex, or the vortical forces holding the stars is being overpowered by an external vortical force of another larger galaxy system on its near encounter.
UVS predicates that the ripping of a galaxy is caused by the cyclonic gravity field effect from another larger galaxy system on near encounter.
The effects of a satellite galactic vortex that could aggregrate stars in a satellite galaxy, is rendered by the vortical spin fusion of its nested spheroidal vortex to push in on the repulsing surfaces of the nested plasmatic shell of adjacent stars, and this would cause their outer plasmatic shells to merge by the process of magnetic reconnection; in a manner this is similar to chemical covalent bond of a molecule.
If its host galaxy snatches these vortically consolidated stars that are closely packed, they would then revolve by spiraling around the host galaxy as a star cluster that spiral to revolve as a group of stars, or as a binary star system with two stars, and each group of these reconsolidated stars share a common plasmatic shell.
UVS predicates that binary stars are revolving around each other in a common plasmatic shell that was merged from the plasmatic shells of the two stars.
These reconsolidated stars are encapsulated in their common spheroidal unisonal vortex, and they vortically revolve around their barycenter of mass. These suggests that a star cluster is held together by strong interactions from electromagnetic vortices of stars in the weak vortical interactions of their common galactic vortex.
UVS predicates that star cluster is held together by strong interactions from electromagnetic vortices of stars in the weak vortical interactions of their common galactic vortex.
Based on the UVS model, an elliptical galaxy is formed by a dissipated galactic vortex, which is impelled by its spheroidal unisonal vortex that encapsulates the elliptical galaxy.
Note: Animation of the torus shows that as the distance to the axis of revolution decreases, the ring torus becomes a horn torus, then a spindle torus, and when the distance approaches zero, the torus will resemble a sphere.
After the galactic vortex has weakened and eventually dissipated, the vortically aggregated stars in the spiral galaxy would be released by its galactic polar vortex pair, but they would still be consolidated within the nested encapsulation of an outer layer of its nested spheroidal unisonal vortex.
This process transforms the spiral galaxy into an elliptical galaxy, which is a huge ellipsoidal collection of stars.
UVS predicates that elliptical galaxy is formed in the wake of a dissipated galactic vortex pair, which was flattening its galactic spheroid.
From the UVS perspective, these interacting galaxies are seperated in a dual-core galactic vortex; each of these galaxies was manifested in one of the cores of a dual-core galactic vortex.
See a UVS topic on "Galaxy group" that illustrates the intergalactic nested spheroid of the Cartwheel galaxy group.
If this hypothesis of UVS for the almost instantaneous reactions on the vortical structure that held the Cartwheel Galaxy with a span of 150,000 light-years across is true, then the belief that nothing with mass can travel faster than the speed of light is a myth.
See an externally linked topic on "What Is A Quasar" that elucidates on quasar, radio galaxy, and blazar were perceived as different types of celestial object in the past, is as a result of the orientation of their polarized stellar jets.
UVS predicates that quasar is a resonated satellite galaxy impelled by a significant harmonic of its encapsulating nested galactic spheroid. Inspired in a forum discussion with Allen Barrow.
In the UVS world view, stars in a stellar arm driven towards the rim on a furrow as a result of centrifugal force, are caught to be embedded by its vortical interaction in its galactic system .
From the UVS perspective, when a star is dislodged from inside a galactic vortex ring that spins it cyclonically, and thus was moved to the outside of the galactic vortex ring, it would be subjected to an anti-cyclonic spin. The star in a spiral stellar arm could become dislodged from its embedment when the satellite galactic vortex impelling it is dissipating, or when its escape velocity is somehow overcome.
The dislodged star would therefore encounter a vortical driving force impelling it in an opposite direction of its intrinsic vortical spin, it thus undergoes the torque-induced precession in the vortical spiral arm to intrinsically spin it in opposite directions. This vortical interactions would cause the dislodged star to slow down gradually in rotating speed and then becomes cooler as a result of the dynamo effect is being gradually reduced.
UVS predicates that supernova is caused in an unwinding process with a harmonic aetheric vortex to impel the star to violently spin in opposed directions.
UVS predicates that red giant star is vortically unwound to expand and expel its materials. With credit to anonymous from Singapore.
See a UVS subtopic on "A thought experiment to simulate spheroidal pushed-in gravity with a huge balloon held in deep ocean" that elaborates on a thought experiment to simulate how red giant and supernova could manifest.
The scattered remnants of the diffused star that were vortically impelled in opposite direction by the spiral arm of the galaxy would then begin to consolidate with heavier elements of star stuff in its opposite spin. This vortical consolidating process in the opposite spin would gradually consolidate the expelled star stuff to consolidate again in its evolution process that could form another generation of enriched stars, planets and their satellites.
From the UVS perspective, a highly energetic spinor field that undulates a star in its nova outburst, could impel the electrostatically encapsulated ionized atoms to exchange electrons with galactic wind, and emits x-ray and gamma-ray from the energized star.
UVS predicates that a star nova outburst of x-ray and gamma ray is caused by a highly energetic spinor field that underlies the star.
See UVS subtopics on "Cometary outburst" that elaborates on how the coma of a comet could release x-ray with its underlying spheroidal unisonal vortex, and "The structures of planetary nebulae" that illustrates all sorts of vortical pattern for nebulae.
See an externally linked topic on "Supermassive Black Hole Devouring a Star" that elaborates on an observed star shredded and unwound by its black hole would become a red giant, "Supermassive Black Hole’s Dizzying Spin Is Half The Speed Of Light", "How black holes both consume and eject material", "Star being shredded by a massive black hole", "ALMA reveals secrets of a dying star", "Hubble Telescope reveals true shape of Ring Nebula" that reveals an unprecedented view of the nebula's three-dimensional nested torus-shaped structure with spokes, "Hyper-velocity star" that evidently suggest a star achieving escape velocity and therefore dislodges from its main galaxy would end up in a supernova explosion, and the mainstream hypotheses for "Nebular hypothesis" and "Stellar evolution" .
Note: Supernova is one of the unsolved problems in physics, and White dwarfs are known to have a low rate of rotation before it undergoes a Type Ia supernova that explodes via the accretion mechanism to unbind the star in a supernova explosion.
Note: The contemplation for supernova explosion was speculated based on unisonal vortex mechanism, and as yet there was no direct evidence found for changing spinning direction of any star that was involved with supernova; the conjectures were merely based on the UVS model with the observed evidence of hyper-velocity star would end up in supernova explosion, and a shredded star unwound by its black hole would become a red giant. UVS model propositioned that supernova is typically caused in an unwinding process by vortically impelling the star to violently spin in opposite direction. If a known star such as Betelgeuse with known details went supernova, and if its supposedly neutron star after the supernova is observed to be spinning at high speed in opposite direction, this would be the initial scientific proof for this claim of UVS on supernova.
From the UVS perspective, the brightness of a star depends on electric current generated by the dynamo effect in magnetohydrodynamics (MHD) of its vortically culminated plasma that causes ionized matter to glow; electric glow discharge.
From the classical mechanics viewpoint, a particle with mass if impelled in vortical motion would produce kinetic energy that could be converted into electrical energy for the process of electric glow discharge.
Note: A MHD dynamo has three requirements - a conducting viscous matter, rotation, and convection.
In the UVS worldview, a galactic vortex can spawn its satellite vortex with higher spinning speed in their differential rotations, and its dynamo effect of intensified aether vortical motion in a vortical gravitational singularity, can cause protoplanetary disks to evolve by the vortical consolidation of interstellar clouds with their precession effects of two-axis spin, and then they are ignited to glow as stars by their resonated dynamo effects.
UVS predicates that star is vortically ignited to glow by the dynamo effect of magnetohydrodynamics in a resonated harmonic of vortical gravitational singularity.
In a freely suspended state, the resonated interstellar materials are vortically consolidated as spinning mass of glowing plasma within a nested spheroidal unisonal vortex; a newly spawned planetary system is vortically fused by vortical motion acting on spheroidally resonated interstellar clouds that spiral in the galactic vortex. Impelled by swirling motion of the galactic vortex, the vortically evolved star and planetary systems coalesced with interstellar materials, are vortically consolidated as a glowing galaxy with satellite galaxies.
All sources of radiation for galaxy clusters, galaxies, stars, novae, supernovae, planetary nebulae and satellites are manifested from vortical motion of aether in nested spheroidal encapsulations.
See a UVS subtopics on "Comet outburst event" that elaborates on the natural electric glow discharge of comets.
From the UVS perspective, in the vortical spin fusion neclosnythesis process of a star, the nucleons in the hydrogen atoms could fuse to create heavier elements, and also the brightness of a star that is vortically impelled and does not depend on the amount of nuclear fuel available for the star to burn. It primarily depends on its precession effects from its two-axis rotation that causes torque-free precession for vortical motion of its viscous matter to heat up and light up the star.
UVS predicates that the brightness of star depends on electric current generated by dynamo effect in magnetohydrodynamics of vortically consolidated plasma.
The high speed spin of plasma jet streams in vortical motion within the corona, could qualitatively explain why the corona is much hotter than the surface of the Sun with tightly packed photosphere that has much limited degree of freedom for motion; kinetic energy of plasma jet streams with vortical motion in high speed spin within the corona are converted to excessive heat.
UVS predicates that the immense heat in corona of the Sun is produced by vortical motion of plasma jet streams with high speed spin by converting kinetic energy into heat.
Evidently, the vortical system of interstellar cloud in a vortical oneness has consolidated further to manifest unisonal vortices in unison within the star, its planets and their moons, in forms such as sunspot clusters on photosphere of the Sun, planetary cloud bands and planetary storms on nested atmosphere of gaseous planet.
From the UVS perspective, volcanic activities on satellites (planets and moons are satellites) with stratified surfaces, are caused by vortex of molten matter. The various types of unisonal vortices are spawned as a result of torque-free precession manifested in different nested layers of viscous matter, are caused by torque-induced precession in the vortical system.
Thermal radiation from the interior of a planet and its satellites is generated by vortical motion in nested layers of viscous matter with precession effect.
UVS predicates that thermal radiation from the interior of a planet and its satellites is generated by vortical motion in nested layers of viscous matter with precession effect.
Based on the UVS model, a planetary system is vortically coalesced by its stellar spheroidal unisonal vortex, and this is impelled by its galactic spheroidal unisonal vortex.
From the UVS perspective, a consolidated planet after "clearing the neighborhood", is still vortically propagating around a vortex ring with transferred angular momentum from the motion of the coalescing primordial protoplanet.
From the galactic reference frame, it can be visualized that the movement of the Earth is a transferred vortical motion from the motion of its galaxy; the Earth is impelled to vortically revolve around the Sun that is also vortically revolving around the Galactic Center.
All orbits are manifested with the vortical motion resonants of their nested spheroidal unisonal vortex.
See UVS topics on See a UVS topics on "Heliosphere" that illustrates on how are planetary orbits formed, "A perpetual motion experiment" that qualitatively proves the motion of Earth is being externally impelled with a vortical push-in force, and "The cognitive paradox fallacy in Copernican heliocentrism" that reviews the conventional widsom of planetary orbit.
It is a scientific fact that the Sun spirals to revolve around the dual-core barycenter of the Solar System. This is as a result of the Sun is exchanging angular momentum primarily with Jupiter, and also with all other Sun's satellites while the Sun moves. It is Indubitable that the Sun revolves by spiraling around the Galactic Center of the Milky Way galaxy at the velocity of approximately 232 km/s and it takes around 230 million years to make one revolving cycle. In the external reference frame of the Milky Way galaxy, the Sun as a matter of fact is moving in a composite helica path around the Galactic Center; this infers the motion of the Sun is primarily impelled by the vortical motion of its galaxy. The motion of the Solar System is a vortical motion transferred from the vortical motion of the Milky Way galaxy, and the Solar System is being coalesced in a resonated vortical motion with stellar materials. This elucidates that the helical motions of Solar System objects are manifested by the vortical motion of the Solar System. Any two celestial objects revolving around each other with their barycenter vortically moving through space, will spiral in helical motions with precession effects.
With this transcendental visualization, one can comprehensively understand that all the orbits of natural satellites, are developed as a result of conserved angular momentum transferred from vortical dynamics of a primordial nested spheroidal vortex that exchanges angular momentum in a unisonal manner. In its epistemic process that is substantiated with empirical observations, UVS postulates that the Solar System were manifested by the vortical spin fusion of interstellar clouds in resonant frequencies of standing wave, and they are vortically propagating in longitudinal waves. The superpositioning of two significant centrifugal forces of the dual-core planetary system in precession, renders the elliptical and apsidal motions of planets with two focal points in the manifested accretion disk.
From the UVS perspective, the Sun and its planets are perpetually spiraling toward the center of the Solar System that is perpetually moving away with vortical motion in its helical path in the galactic reference frame; this renders the phenomenon of planetary orbits with apsidal and elliptical motions that are precessing in the localized reference frame of a static Sun. With this cognitive paradox meticulously resolved in its transcendental perspective, as a matter of fact, it is a qualitative proof that the orbits of natural satellites were developed as a result of conserved angular momentum transferred from the vortical dynamics of their underlying nested spheroidal vortices.
UVS predicates that the orbits of natural satellites were developed as a result of conserved angular momentum are being transferred from their underlying nested spheroidal vortices.
UVS predicates that the Solar System objects were manifested by vortical spin fusion of interstellar clouds in resonant frequencies of standing wave and they are vortically propagating in longitudinal waves.
See externally linked topics on "The Universal Helicola" and "Motions of Observable Structures Ruled by Hierarchical Two-body Gravitation in the Universe" for some proposed mathematical models on revolving celestial objects.
See UVS topics on "Geometric structure of magnetosphere" and "Unisonal evolution mechanism" that demonstrate this vortical dynamics with "Dipole moment in mechanical illustration", "Aetheric jet stream" that elaborates on the particle paths of Earth's magnetic field lines. See an externally linked topic on "The Universal Helicola" that presents an impeccable illustration for spiral motion of Earth's path in space on page 269 in figure 13.1, it was comprehensively elaborated qualitatively, analytically and quantitatively.
See also video clips on "Earth Rotation & Revolution around a moving Sun" that illustrates with an external perception for the helical motion of Earth in a moving Sun, and "The solar system's motion thru space". Note: These illustrations would be qualitatively more accurate if they show the barycenter motion of a moving Sun that propagates in a composite helical path around the Galactic Center.
The orbital resonance of planets and satellites in Solar System with orbiting bodies that exert gravitational influence on each other has mutual precession effects acting on each other in a cyclical manner.
From the UVS perspective, the apsidal precession of planets is an empirical evidence for the spiral motion of a moving Sun in its revolving path around the Galactic Center. In its vortical fractal level shifted down by one level, Jupiter can be perceived to be vortically spiraling around the Sun and it is wobbling around a composite center of mass as a result of its moons.
See UVS topics on "The dust disk of star" and "Mysterious planetary rings" that illustrate vortically formed nested disks and ring systems of celestial objects, and a UVS subtopic on "Vortical motion of planetary moon" that elaborate on the implications with vortical motion of Solar Systems objects.
Note: The vortical paths in helical spiral motion of planets were independently visualized with the UVS model without any priori reference, other similar concepts were later found through the Internet on further inquiry, such as "Spiral Forms in Space" as illustrated by Dr. Wilhelm Reich (MD) in the web site of Dr. James DeMeo, Ph.D., "Universal Helicola" as illustrated by Dr. Vladimir Ginzburg and "The solar system's motion thru space"as illustrated by Nassim Haramein. Nonetheless, among these similar illustrations, UVS uniquely illustrated with scientific evidence for how the Sun and its planets were vortically formed, why they propagate in spiral motions through space and how they were vortically impelled to move in spiral motion.
If a planet is cyclonically rotating in counter-clockwise direction at an angular speed slower than the counter-clockwise angular speed of its cyclonic revolving path, from the Sun's perspective, the planet would be deemed as rotating in clockwise direction. It is paradoxically rotating in clockwise direction in the frame of reference from the Sun's perspective, this is as a result of its counter-clockwise angular speed is rotating slower than the counter-clockwise angular speed revolving around the Sun; this paradoxically renders the optical illusion that Venus is rotating in clockwise direction in its counter-clockwise revolving path.
If Venus is in retrograde rotation at all, it should take less than the approximately 224.7 days for its sidereal rotation period in its apparently perceived retrograde rotation; this is not the case. Critically, the apparently perceived retrograde rotation of Venus is a relative motion illusion rendered in its observational delusion.
In its transcendental perspective, Venus is cyclonically rotating in counter-clockwise direction in the Solar System reference frame with prograde motion. The cognitive paradox was thus meticulously resolved with its delusional observation elucidated.
UVS predicates that Venus is cyclonically rotating in counter-clockwise direction in its counter-clockwise revolving path around the Sun. Inspired in a forum discussion with Graham Burnett.
It is a fact that Venus takes approximately 243 days for its apparently perceived retrograde rotation (or approximately -243 days for its sidereal rotation period) , while it takes approximately 224.7 days to revolve around the Sun; Venus is rotating away in counter-clockwise direction with prograde motion. The fact that Venus rotates in counter-clockwise direction in its counter-clockwise revolving path around the Sun, as can be empirically observed from the external perspective of the Solar System, is a qualitative proof that Venus is cyclonically rotating with prograde motion.
Note: The negative sign for the sidereal rotation period of Venus, is merely a symbolic indication for its apparently perceived retrograde motion.
Voyager's observations revealed that the magnetic field is peculiar, both because it does not originate from the planet's geometric center, and because it is tilted at 59° from the axis of rotation. In fact the magnetic dipole is shifted from the center of the planet towards the south rotational pole by as much as one third of the planetary radius. This unusual geometry results in a highly asymmetric magnetosphere, .... Neptune has a similarly displaced and tilted magnetic field, suggesting that this may be a common feature of ice giants. One hypothesis is that, unlike the magnetic fields of the terrestrial and gas giant planets, which are generated within their cores, the ice giants' magnetic fields are generated by motion at relatively shallow depths, for instance, in the water–ammonia ocean. "
The above are excerpts from a topic on Uranus, from Wikipedia in around 2008.
The above proposition that suggests Uranus has an axial tilt of 97.77 degrees with inverse magnetic field in the invariable plane, suggests that the somehow tilted over Uranus is rotating in prograde motion; this perspective suggests Uranus in prograde rotation is merely tilted more than 90 degrees in the plane of the Solar System.
From the external reference frame of the Solar System, as can be asserted with its similar orientation for its magnetic south and north poles as compared with other planets in the Solar System, Uranus is in fact rotating in retrograde motion; its prograde motion is merely apparently perceived from the point of view of its tilted over axis.
Note: It later had been amended in the Wikipedia topic to conclude that Uranus is rotating in retrograde motion for its sidereal rotation.
See an externally linked topic on "North Magnetic Pole" that elaborates that the Earth's North Magnetic Pole is actually a magnetic south pole and the Earth's South Magnetic Pole is a magnetic north pole.
Based on the UVS model, the Earth with its moon in their primeval molten forms are coalesced from a local vortical group of interstellar clouds formed as a nested torus-shaped ring, and this ring was impelled by the steallar vortex of the Solar System to vortically revolve around the Sun. This nested torus-shaped vortical ring of interstellar clouds with precession effect vortically consolidate higher density materials toward its core, and vortically spreads lighter density materials toward its rim in their closed streamline. This hypothesis explains why the materials on Moon coalesced with the interstellar clouds in a satellite vortex carrying a spectrum of lighter density materials, is similar to the composition of Earth; the Moon could be evolved in the same nested vortical system in which the Earth was evolved from.
See UVS topics on "Jet streams" that elaborates on how an atmospheric jet stream in closed streamline is manifested by its underlying free vortex.
After the torus-shaped ring of interstellar clouds is compressed to a compact region in the ring with the vortical spin fusion resonanted from its precession effect, it renders the effects of clearing the neighbourhood, and thus coalesced the interstellar materials in the torus-shaped ring to form as a spheroidal Earth in its most efficiently balanced form. A vortically manifested torus-shaped ring that formed around the Earth and had also compressed to a compact region in its ring, had thus coalesced with the accreted interstellar materials to form as the Moon.
In this hypothesis, the Moon is vortically consolidated from a torus-shaped vortical ring of stellar materials that revolves in the vortical system of the primordial Earth, and its vortical mechanism could also explain why the sidereal rotation of Moon is tidally locked to Earth. The primordial Earth consolidated from stellar materials in its vortical ring that spiral to revolve around the Sun results in the rotating direction and the angular speed for the sidereal rotation of Earth.
UVS predicates that the primeval Earth with its Moon is vortically coalesced from a nested torus-shaped vortical ring of stellar materials formed around the Sun.
Note: Although further illustrations would be necessary to clarify this vortical mechanism, contemplating on the UVS model could elucidate this concept.
From the UVS perspective, most craters on Earth and Moon are remnants of molten matter vortices that were formed before their surfaces are stratified to become their crust layers; unisonal vortex mechanism can explain the numerous crater formations on primeval Earth and primeval Moon. Earth has a magma ocean underneath its crust and therefore formation of molten matter vortex would still be an ongoing cyclical process that could occasionally intensify as a result of a strong Solar System alignment effect.
The lunar surface is marred with numerous craters laced in basalt materials are evident that these are remnants of molten matter vortices. The surface of Earth is also marred with numerous craters in packs that are visible from space. Examine satellite image of Earth closely would reveal countless big and small craters by the hundreds all over the world, visible on main lands and sea beds as well.
See an externally linked topic on "Crater Map" powered by Geology.com that could show Earth is marred with numerous craters in packs.
In comparative studies, the gaseous surfaces of Jupiter and Saturn are laced with packed vortices that are still active, many of their moons are also marred with numerous craters in packs. Beneath the stratified surface for some of these moons such as Io, molten matter vortices are still active and therefore could manifest as volcanic activities and periodical earthquakes.
See a paper on "Jupiter and Io Observe Each Other" that suggests moon Io undergoes tides and earthquakes on a 42-hour cycle as it orbits Jupiter.
In the above thermal image of Saturn, literally hundreds of storm clouds encircle the pole, appearing as dark spots in this infrared spectrometer thermal image; these are vortically induced swirling motion that were manifested on the surfaces of its gaseous atmospheric layers.
Frome the UVS perspective, the Earth and its moon in their primeval molten forms would have been laced with molten satellite vortices similar to the gas giants, and after becoming stratified these vortices then became the craters as their remnants.
Based on the UVS model, Sun is coalesced by its stellar vortex, which is vortically impelled by its spheroidal unisonal vortex. In precession cylces, the Sun in barycenter motion exchanges angular momentum with all stuff encapsulate in the spheroidal unisonal vortex.
In the UVS worldview, the uniformly spread out comets revolving around the Sun in tilted elliptical orbits from the invariable plane, are formed by vortical consolidation of stellar materials in the harmonics of a spheroidal unisonal vortex with its two-axis spin.
UVS predicates that comets in Oort cloud revolving around Sun in uniformly spread out manner are vortically consolidated in harmonics of unisonal vortex.
have often made the hypothesis that ultimately physics will not require
a mathematical statement,
~ With special thanks to Allen Barrow (aka PoPpAScience of TOEQuest Forum) for his post #135 on protoplanet HL Tau b, this is strong scientific evidence for evolution of stars and planets are through vortex dynamics. In a concept of cosmic evolution (in physical cosmology aspect) on macro levels in Charles Darwin style, this image has important implications in many aspects for Universal Vortical Singularity. It is the missing link in factual astronomy observation as evidence that completes the vortical universe scenarios of Universal Vortical Singularity; the unisonal dynamics of vortical interactions that weave a chain of celestial events from a galaxy system to its star systems with their planetary systems in unisonal motion through a universal vortical system.
~ With special thanks to Graham Burnett (aka G_burnett of TOEQuest Forum) for his post on hyper-velocity star that evidently suggest a star achieving escape velocity and therefore dislodge from its main galaxy would end up in a supernova explosion.
~ With special thanks to Graham Burnett for his intellectual interactions on magnetism, magnet pole reversal of Earth and magnetosphere of Uranus. The discussion has also led to reveal on the apparent retrograde rotation of Venus is actually rotating cyclonically in counter-clockwise direction similar to other planets in the Solar System.
~ With special thanks to Anna Lorrina Mitchell (aka labelwench of TOEQuest) for her post #727 linking to "Space tornado" that evidently illustrates the vortical dynamics of a stellar jet observed with NASA's Spitzer infrared telescope.
~ With special thanks to Professor Christopher W. Hodshire from Western Michigan University for his email on highlighting a link on "Galaxy Cluster Spawns Stars Faster Than Any In Known Universe". In the UVS worldview, this is strong scientific evidence for the existence of a Cosmic Spheroid that vortically spawn stars, and then these stars vortically coalesced as a cluster of galaxies.
With special thanks to anonymous from Singapore for his email on highlighting
a link on "Supermassive
Black Hole’s Dizzying Spin Is Half The Speed Of Light",
reveals secrets of a dying star"
that evidently illustrates the spiral structure of the red giant star
R Sculptoris, the reports on "Never-Before-Seen
Stage of Planet Birth Revealed",
Telescope reveals true shape of Ring Nebula"
that reveals an unprecedented view of the nebula's three-dimensional nested
torus-shaped structure with spokes.
Some resonated remarks received that are relevant to Universal Vortical Singularity (aka UVS) for this UVS topic on "Evolve of stars and galaxies":
loved reading your research again. It does make me rethink and in some
cases, relearn my understanding of the cosmos.”
intriguing website full of enlightening concepts and analyses!”
“Objectively speaking, even in its present mostly qualitative form, UVS makes a significant contribution to the discovery of spiral nature of the universe. No person holds a complete truth about the nature of the universe, and UVS brings attention of scientists to an interesting path of solving this very challenging problem.”, “With great respect, Vladimir.” - Dr. Vladimir B. Ginzburg, mathematician, accomplished scientist, author of "Prime Elements of Ordinary Matter, Dark Matter & Dark Energy", "Spiral Grain of the Universe" and several other renowned books such as "Metallurgical Design of Flat Rolled Steels" for applied science, and holds over fifty U.S. and foreign patents, 28th Jun 2009.
“UVS is the future of science.” - Allen Barrow (aka PoPpAScience of TOEQuest Forum), 12th Dec 2008.
19th June 2007
Disclaimers: The treatise of Universal Vortical Singularity (UVS) in its epistemological paradigm shift, is fundamentally unconventional. Its hypotheses based on a generally unheard-of UVS model, are bounded to have shortcomings, loose ends, and errors. Many details and assumptions in its propositions have yet to be further researched, probed, evaluated, validated, or verified. Its implicit explanations are for casual understanding of the UVS topics presented in the UVS worldview, so if any term or statement is offensive in any manner or from whatsoever perspectives, is most regretted. Links to other sites do not imply endorsement of their contents; apply appropriate discretion whenever necessary. For whatsoever reasons, at times the viewing for some of its contents could helplessly experience text corruptions, disorganized content layouts, missing images, failed animations, and some external links simply had ceased to exist.
Viewing tips: Despite the presentations of the UVS web pages has went through much accommodation for their viewings on smart phones, they are not very friendly to smaller low resolution mobile devices. It is therefore recommended to access and view the UVS contents with a system device that at least has a larger high definition screen, such as a larger smart phones, an android tablet, or an iPad. For the best experiences, use a MS Windows based PC or computer system to browse with Internet Explorer or Mozilla Firefox that is Java enabled for its interactive applets. (Such as Java Applet of Moiré pattern, JPL Small-Body Database Browser, and Planet Finder.)
Copyright information: This UVS web site is for non-profit purposes and not for commercial use. Wherever possible, direct credits to the origins of the works or images were provided, be it on fair dealings, with explicit permission from their owners, or the materials were believed to be from the public domain.