. Based
on the UVS
model, the nested polar vortex pair of Jupiter[w]
has had its cascaded vortex column pair symmetrically opened up
on different atmospheric layers to various latitudes of its nested
atmosphere at various altitudes; the nested atmospheric layers were
vortically compressed from the two poles toward the equator by the
cascaded vortical columns of its nested polar vortex pair. |
“By visualizing the underlying structures and mechanisms, it intuitively reveals
the actualities of the mysteriously rendered natural phenomena.” - UVS inspired -
The cloud bands of
Jupiter - Manifested by a pair of nested
polar vortices
| Image on right is a top view of Jupiter's south pole showing circular cloud bands with the Great Red Spot among other vortices and storms. In the UVS worldview, the cloud bands of Jupiter are the cascaded vortical structures of its nested polar vortex pair, which are vortically warping around the entire planet from its two poles. The cognitive paradox that mysteriously renders the formation of cloud bands on Jupiter was thus meticulously resolved with its underlying vortical structure and mechanism explicated. |
The UVS research predicates the cloud bands on Jupiter are formed by its nested polar vortex pair with its cascaded vortex columns opened to differentiated extents on its nested atmosphere.
See the UVS topics on "Polar vortex" that elaborates on how the cognitive paradox of Earth's polar vortex was resolved.
 |
 |
| Looping animation of rotating cloud bands on Jupiter with the Great Red Spot and other storms. (See a larger full resolution image 7.51MB.) [s] / [s] | |
See an externally linked topic on "Zones, belts and jets" that elaborates on the cloud bands of Jupiter. From the UVS perspective, the cloud band of the Equatorial Zone (EZ), is vortically formed on a higher cloud level as a result of a cascaded vortex column pair of the nested polar vortex pair, which have had opened up to the tropical region on both sides of the equator. This cloud band overlays above all other cloud bands, which are also vortically formed by the inner cascaded vortex column pair in a paradoxical inverse manner. This cloud band of the Equatorial Zone formed on higher altitude, overlays on all lower altitude layers of the wider and overlapping cloud bands. The overlapping of wider cloud bands on lower altitudes caused by the nested polar vortex pair of Jupiter, rendered the phenomenon of symmetric cloud bands pairs on both hemispheres that appeared as horizontal stripes at various latitudinal zones; the exposed regions of the overlaying cloud bands appeared as the idealized belts and zones[w] of cloud bands. |
With the underlying vortical structure and mechanism for cloud band elucidated, the nested polar vortex pair of Jupiter is thus visualized, and its observation thus indubitably substantiates as the qualitative proof that cloud bands on Jupiter, are formed by their cascaded vortex column pair.
Note: Cloud bands on Jupiter, Saturn, Uranus, and Neptune, are major unsolved problems in planetary science.
The grounding for its epistemic theories of truth: The underlying vortical structure and mechanism of Jupiter's cloud bands as explicated with its hypothetical construct based on the UVS model, elucidated its delusional observations that render its misconceptions, mysteries, and anomalies. Thus, its cognitive paradox was simply dispersed, and all the related natural phenomena were then qualitatively analysed in the conceptual framework of UVS by inductive reasoning for explicating with their empirical evidence to predicate by abductive reasoning.
See the UVS topic on "Overviews of the UVS research" that elaborates on its visual grounded theory for the evaluations of natural phenomena.
“I
have often made the hypothesis that ultimately physics will not require
a mathematical statement,
that in the end the machinery will be revealed and the laws will turn
out to be simple.”
-
Richard Feynman
.
The
planetary rings of Jupiter
Based on the UVS model, the planetary rings of Jupiter[w] are formed as a result of some sections of the nested polar vortex pair at higher altitude atmospheric layers, have had their vortex eyes opened to the extent that they are flattened on the equatorial plane, and thus formed as planetary rings. These vaguely visible outer atmospheric layers, overlaid above the equatorial cloud band layer, were vortically flattened as planetary rings. See the UVS topic on "The mysterious planetary Rings" for an animated illustration on how an atmospheric layer is being opened by its nested polar vortex pair to compress it as flattened rings around its equator. |
|
Heuristically, the vaguely visible razor-thin planetary ring[uvs] extended on the equatorial plane, formed by a flattened pair of polar vortex opened to the equator, cuts onto the surface of the cloud band of the equatorial zone, and thus drags on the cloud band. This effect renders the phenomenon of butterfly-shaped interference patterns on the westerly cloud band of the Equatorial Zone.
Note: Despite the planetary rings of Satun have been observed 400 years ago, the causality for planetary rings is still a mystery in astronomy and astrophysics.
.
The
retrograde cloud bands of Jupiter
From the UVS perspective, the polar vortex pair that forms the thinner cloud band of the Equatorial Zone (EZ), overlays on the polar vortex pair that forms the wider belt of brownish cloud band on lower altitude. The exposed sections of the wider belt of brownish cloud band, thus appeared as the North Equatorial Belt (NEB) and the South Equatorial Belt (SEB) by the two sides of the Equatorial Zone cloud band.
As could be perceived, the narrower cloud band of the Equatorial Zone on higher altitude, are impelling two circular chains of cyclonic satellite vortices in the lower altitude brownish cloud band at its both sides in the exposed North Equatorial Belt and South Equatorial Belt. The atmospheric layer in the Equatorial Zone and the atmospheric layer in the North and South Equatorial Belt are apparently interacting in a differential rotation. These two chains of cyclonic satellite vortex clusters, having merged at the rims of the nested polar vortex on lower altitude with their differential motions, thus render the phenomenon of the two easterly retrograding cloud bands and retrograde jet streams as observed in the exposed regions of the lower altitude brownish cloud band. They asymmetrically appear on both sides of the equator at the two sides in the wider brownish cloud band, which underlies just below the narrower cloud band of the Equatorial Zone. |
The UVS research predicates the Jupiter's retrograde cloud bands are formed by the differential motions in the chains of merged cyclonic satellite vortex clusters.
Note: The phenomenon of retrograde cloud bands on Jupiter defies the Coriolis effect.
Based on unisonal vortex mechanism[uvs], the jet streams on Jupiter are manifested by the vortrices[uvs] of the nested polar vortex pair of Jupiter; these are the ring torus[m] structures of the nested polar vortex pair.
The UVS research predicates the jet streams on Jupiter are manifested by the vortrices of the nested polar vortex pair of Jupiter.
See the UVS topic on "Jet streams" that elaborates on how all the jet streams on Earth are manifested by its nested polar vortex pair.
With the underlying vortical structure and mechanism of jet stream elucidated, the empirical observations of jet streams on Jupiter substantiate as the qualitative proofs that these jet streams are the ring torus structures of its nested polar vortex pair.
Note: Jet streams on Jupiter, Saturn, Uranus, and Neptune, are also major unsolved problems in planetary science.
Watch a video clip on "Perpetual Ocean" that illustrates amazing satellite views for vortices manifested in the oceans of the Earth.
.
The
satellite vortices of Jupiter
Based on the UVS model, the ovals and storms on Jupiter[w] are satellite vortices , which are impelled by the nested polar vortex pair of Jupiter to intrinsically resonate in its nested atmosphere. The UVS research predicates the ovals and storms on Jupiter are coalesced by satellite vortices manifested and impelled by the nested polar vortex pair of Jupiter. From the UVS perspective, the cyclonic satellite vortex is impelled by the westerly jet stream manifested by a segment of the nested polar vortex with its prograde motion, and the anti-cyclonic satellite vortex is impelled by the easterly jet stream manifested by a segment of the nested polar vortex pair with its retrograde motion. And it is simply a fact that these vortices as observed on Jupiter, are the satellite vortices of the Jupiter's nested polar vortex pair. This observation is a qualitative proof for the ovals and storms are intrinsically resonated satellite vortices, and they are impelled by the jet streams manifested by the nested polar vortex pair of Jupiter. |
See an externally linked reports on "Mysteries at Jupiter: NASA's Juno Probe Reveals Cyclones, Auroras & Surprises", and "Scientists Baffled by Perfectly Geometric ‘Polygons’ of Cyclones on Jupiter".
|
From the UVS perspective, the polygons of cyclones on Jupiter as observed by a NASA space probe, are satellite vortices that are being formed with differential vortical motion in a nested unisonal vortex.
In a nested manner, these polygons of cyclones are the anticyclonic vortices resonated to form around its dominating cyclonic vortex.
“If
it looks like a duck, swims like a duck, and quacks like a duck, then
it probably is a duck.”
-
Duck
test
.
The
polar aurorae of Jupiter
Based on unisonal vortex mechanism[uvs], the phenomenon of the polar aurorae on Jupiter is rendered by an intensified plasmatic polar vortex.
From the UVS perspective, the pair of polar aurorae on Jupiter are vortically impelled by its nested polar vortex pair to ionically glow.
The illumination of an polar aurora is caused by electric current generated by the dynamo effect[m] in magnetohydrodynamics[w] of its vortically formed plasma, which causes ionized matters to glow by electric glow discharge[w] in the gaseous atmosphere.
Heuristically, Jupiter and Sun have striking similarities in many aspects for their vortical nature, and thus they are very comparable in the UVS worldview.
The observed polar aurora on Jupiter suggests Jupiter could be perceived as a failed star; it merely did not have the sufficient vortically induced dynamo effect and required properties for igniting its plasma glow enitrely to lit up like the Sun.
And if Jupiter somehow manages to lit up to glow like the Sun with its dynamo effect, the satellite vortices formed on the jet streams of Jupiter could manifest as the sunspots[uvs] of Jupiter.
See the UVS subtopic on "Polar aurorae of gas giants" that elaborates on how polar aurorae are induced and demarcated by their underlying plasmatic polar vortex pair.
.
The
Great Red Spot on Jupiter
From the UVS perspective, the Great Red Spot on Jupiter[w] is an anticyclonic storm resonated in its anti-cyclonic satellite free vortex, which is impelled by a retrograde jet stream of a nested polar vortex in a nested atmospheric layer of Jupiter. As a result of being impelled by a westerly jet stream, the Great Red Spot[w] spinning in counter-clockwise direction, is an anti-cyclone that forms on the South Equatorial Belt in the southern hemisphere. As empirically observed, the Great Red Spot is fixated with the sidereal rotation of Jupiter. This suggests that it is a persistent atmospheric eddy[w] of a fixed emergent structure underneath the cloud band, impelled by the retrograde jet stream of its anti-cyclonic satellite free vortex. The UVS research predicates the Great Red Spot is a persistent atmospheric eddy of its anti-cyclonic satellite vortex. Revamped. |
See the UVS topic on "Bermuda Triangle" that illustrates on how the dragging effect of landmass could cause an atmospheric eddy to form in the nested atmosphere of the Earth.
See an externally linked report on "ROTATION PERIOD OF GREAT RED SPOT" that shows the Great Red Spot had revolved with the rotation of Jupiter with only a slight fluctuation.
| An
earlier analysis for the causality of the Great Red Spot that was
falsified with insufficient evidence:
Note: In the event if the rotation period of Great Red Spot is later found out to be in fact rotating in any form of Laplace resonance, this predication of UVS research could be deemed as generally vindicated.
There was no empirical evidence as yet that the Great Red Spot revolves on Jupiter internally at the orbital period of 10.6 hour, however, this is a very reasonable proposal by considering its slight westward drift (can be empirically observed) caused by the easterly jet stream that retrogrades on the South Equatorial Belt, which would have slightly increased its orbital period of the Great Red Spot, and could have increased it from 9.925 hours to 10.6 hours. (*falsified: There is empirical evidence available on the Great Red Spot did not revolve at the orbital period of 10.6 hour.) Paradoxically, this resolution for resolving the mystery was accomplished by analyzing the Laplace resonance of Great Red Spot and the three Galilean Moons in an inside-out manner perceived with the ratio of orbital period; analyzing in the outside-in manner perceived with the ratio of number of orbits negates its resolution from being discovered in plain sight. And the underlying mechanism that supposedly impels the Great Red Spot has come from outside of Jupiter, it supposedly comes from the torque-induced precession of the three Galilean moons in orbital resonance; the causality is seemingly not from within Jupiter that renders the stability of the Great Red Spot. *falsified |
With credit to oldbrew from TALLBLOKE'S TALKSHOP for his post that links to an archive on "ROTATION PERIOD OF GREAT RED SPOT", which has a 135 year record for the sidereal revolving period of the Great Red Spot, and it shows that the Great Red Spot had revolved with the rotation of Jupiter with only a slight fluctuation.
Glossary:
| altitude | - |
The height of a thing above a reference level, especially above sea level or above the earth's surface. |
| cyclonic | - |
Describing a direction of rotation that is counterclockwise in the Northern Hemisphere, clockwise in the Southern Hemisphere. |
| cognitive paradox | - |
A category of paradox with illusions that involve perception or awareness, such as relative motion illusion, optical illusion, tactile illusion (aka touch illusion) and the likes. |
| differential rotation | - |
Different parts of a rotating fluid object move with different angular velocities. |
| easterly | - |
A storm or wind coming from the east, toward the west; westwardly. |
| latitude | - |
The measurement, in degrees, of a place's distance north or south of the equator. |
| viscous | - |
Having the property of viscosity; sticky. |
| vortical singularity | - |
A four-dimensional spheroidal culmination of aether with vortical motion that unisonally spawns its resonated nested vortical fractals in its vortical paradigm. |
| westerly | - |
A storm or wind coming from the west, toward the east; eastwardly. |
Image
and animation credits:
Image
of planetary rings of Jupiter - Selden's gallery of Celestia pictures
Idealized
illustration of Jupiter's cloud bands
- Uploaded by User:Erimus; Public Domain
Enhanced
interior image of the Jupiter's south pole - NASA/JPL-Caltech/SwRI/MSSS/Betsy
Asher Hall/Gervasio Robles SCOTT BOLTON - 3
Image
of aurora on Jupiter as viewed by Hubble - By NASA, ESA, and J. Nichols
(University of Leicester)
Image
of polygons’ of Cyclones on Jupiter
- By NASA
A
false color image of Jupiter's polar aurora - NASA/ESA, John T. Clarke
(University of Michigan)
Image
of aurorae on Jupiter (false color) - From AURA/STScI/NASA/JPL
Images
and animations of Jupiter - From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
A
sketch of unisonal vortex - Vincent Wee-Foo
Animation
of cloud band of Jupiter - Animation by Vincent Wee-Foo created with
an image of Jupiter from NASA
Galilean
moon Laplace resonance animation - By Matma Rex, illustration transformed
by Vincent Wee-Foo
The classified denotations with URL links for the individual words and specific phrases denoted in the UVS treatise:
[uvs] |
- |
A specific UVS topic or a source from the UVS treatise. |
[g] |
- |
The definition for the word in the glossary list of the UVS treatise. |
[d] |
- |
The general definitions for the word from an the Internet dictionary source. |
[w]
|
- |
A specific topic of the free encyclopedia by Wikipedia. |
[m] |
- |
A miscellaneous Internet source. |
[s] |
- |
The Internet source for the inserted image or animation. |
The inception of this UVS topic was on 27th July 2007 with ongoing updates since.
Disclaimers: The treatise of Universal Vortical Singularity (UVS) in its epistemological paradigm shift, is fundamentally unconventional. Its hypotheses grounded on a generally unheard-of UVS model, bound to have shortcomings, such as loose ends, errors, and omissions errors. Many details and assumptions in its propositions have yet to be further researched, probed, evaluated, validated, or verified. Its implicit explanations are for casual understanding of the UVS topics presented in the UVS worldview, so if any term or statement is offensive in any manner from whatsoever perspectives, is most regretted. Links to other sites do not imply endorsement of their contents; apply appropriate discretion whenever necessary. Also, the content of the UVS topics, from time to time could be arbitrarily modified without any notice.
Viewing tips: Despite the presentations of the UVS web pages has went through much accommodation for their viewings on smart phones, they are still not entirely friendly to these mobile devices. For the best experiences, use a MS Windows based PC or computer system with Java enabled browser for running its interactive applets. (Such as Java Applet of Moiré pattern, JPL Small-Body Database Browser, and Planet Finder.)
Copyright information: This UVS web site is for non-profit purposes and not for commercial use. Wherever possible, direct credits to the origins of the works or images were provided, be it on fair dealings, with explicit permission from their owners, or the materials were believed to be from the public domain.