.
The
UVS inductive resolutions on the vortices of Jupiter
Based
on the UVS
model, the nested polar vortex pair of Jupiter[w]
has had its cascaded vortex column pair symmetrically opened up
on different atmospheric layers to various latitudes of its nested
atmosphere at various altitudes; the nested atmospheric layers were
vortically compressed from the two poles toward the equator by the
cascaded vortical columns of its nested polar vortex pair.
. |
“By
visualizing the underlying structures and mechanisms, it intuitively reveals
the actualities of the mysteriously rendered natural phenomena.”
- UVS inspired -
The cloud bands of
Jupiter - Manifested by a pair of nested
polar vortices
Image
on right is a top view of Jupiter's south pole showing circular
cloud bands with the Great Red Spot among other vortices and storms.
In
the UVS worldview,
the cloud bands of Jupiter are the cascaded vortical structures
of its nested polar vortex pair, which are vortically warping around
the entire planet from its two poles.
The
cognitive paradox that mysteriously renders the formation of cloud
bands on Jupiter was thus meticulously resolved with its underlying
vortical structure and mechanism explicated. |
|
The
UVS research predicates the cloud bands on Jupiter are formed by its nested
polar vortex pair with its cascaded vortex columns opened to differentiated
extents on its nested atmosphere.
See
the UVS topics on "Polar
vortex" that elaborates on how the cognitive paradox of Earth's
polar vortex was resolved.
See
an externally linked topic on "Zones,
belts and jets" that elaborates on the cloud bands of Jupiter.
From
the UVS perspective, the cloud band of the Equatorial Zone (EZ),
is vortically formed on a higher cloud level as a result of a cascaded
vortex column pair of the nested polar vortex pair, which have had
opened up to the tropical region on both sides of the equator. This
cloud band overlays above all other cloud bands, which are also
vortically formed by the inner cascaded vortex column pair in a
paradoxical inverse manner.
This
cloud band of the Equatorial Zone formed on higher altitude, overlays
on all lower altitude layers of the wider and overlapping cloud
bands.
The
overlapping of wider cloud bands on lower altitudes caused by the
nested polar vortex pair of Jupiter, rendered the phenomenon of
symmetric cloud bands pairs on both hemispheres that appeared as
horizontal stripes at various latitudinal zones; the exposed regions
of the overlaying cloud bands appeared as the idealized belts
and zones[w] of cloud bands. |

Idealized
illustration of Jupiter's cloud bands. [s] |
With
the underlying vortical structure and mechanism for cloud band elucidated,
the nested polar vortex pair of Jupiter is thus visualized, and its observation
thus indubitably substantiates as the qualitative proof
that cloud bands on Jupiter, are formed by their cascaded vortex column
pair.
Note:
Cloud bands on Jupiter, Saturn, Uranus, and Neptune, are major unsolved
problems in planetary
science.
The
grounding for its
epistemic theories of truth:
The underlying vortical structure and mechanism of Jupiter's cloud
bands as explicated with its hypothetical construct based on the UVS model,
elucidated its delusional observations that render its misconceptions,
mysteries, and anomalies. Thus, its cognitive paradox was simply dispersed,
and all the related natural phenomena were then qualitatively analysed
in the conceptual framework of UVS by inductive reasoning for explicating
with their empirical evidence to predicate by abductive reasoning.
See
the UVS topic on "Overviews
of the UVS research" that elaborates on its visual grounded theory
for the evaluations of natural phenomena.
“I
have often made the hypothesis that ultimately physics will not require
a mathematical statement,
that in the end the machinery will be revealed and the laws will turn
out to be simple.”
-
Richard Feynman
.
The
planetary rings of Jupiter
Based
on the UVS model, the planetary rings
of Jupiter[w] are formed as a result of
some sections of the nested polar vortex pair at higher altitude
atmospheric layers, have had their vortex eyes opened to the extent
that they are flattened on the equatorial plane, and thus formed
as planetary rings. These vaguely visible outer atmospheric layers,
overlaid above the equatorial cloud band layer, were vortically
flattened as planetary rings.
See
the UVS topic on "The
mysterious planetary Rings" for an animated illustration
on how an atmospheric layer is being opened by its nested polar
vortex pair to compress it as flattened rings around its equator.
|

Planetary
rings of Jupiter. [s]
|
Heuristically,
the vaguely visible razor-thin planetary ring[uvs]
extended on the equatorial plane, formed by a flattened pair of polar
vortex opened to the equator, cuts onto the surface of the cloud band
of the equatorial zone, and thus drags on the cloud band. This effect
renders the phenomenon of butterfly-shaped interference patterns on the
westerly cloud band of the Equatorial Zone.
Note:
Despite the planetary rings of Satun have been observed 400 years ago,
the causality for planetary rings is still a mystery in astronomy and
astrophysics.
.
The
retrograde cloud bands of Jupiter
From
the UVS perspective, the polar vortex pair that forms the thinner cloud
band of the Equatorial Zone (EZ), overlays on the polar vortex pair that
forms the wider belt of brownish cloud band on lower altitude. The exposed
sections of the wider belt of brownish cloud band, thus appeared as the
North Equatorial Belt (NEB) and the South Equatorial Belt (SEB) by the
two sides of the Equatorial Zone cloud band.
As
could be perceived, the narrower cloud band of the Equatorial Zone
on higher altitude, are impelling two circular chains of cyclonic
satellite vortices in the lower altitude brownish cloud band at
its both sides in the exposed North Equatorial Belt and South Equatorial
Belt.
The
atmospheric layer in the Equatorial Zone and the atmospheric layer
in the North and South Equatorial Belt are apparently interacting
in a differential rotation.
These
two chains of cyclonic satellite vortex clusters, having merged
at the rims of the nested polar vortex on lower altitude with their
differential motions, thus render the phenomenon of the two easterly
retrograding cloud bands and retrograde jet streams as observed
in the exposed regions of the lower altitude brownish cloud band.
They
asymmetrically appear on both sides of the equator at the two sides
in the wider brownish cloud band, which underlies just below the
narrower cloud band of the Equatorial Zone. |

Voyager 1
approaching
Jupiter, showing the motion of atmospheric bands and the
Great Red Spot. [s] |
|
The
UVS research predicates the Jupiter's retrograde cloud bands are formed
by the differential motions in the chains of merged cyclonic satellite
vortex clusters.
Note:
The phenomenon of retrograde cloud bands on Jupiter defies the Coriolis
effect.
.
The
jet streams of Jupiter
Based
on unisonal
vortex mechanism[uvs],
the jet streams on Jupiter are manifested by the vortrices[uvs]
of the nested polar vortex pair of Jupiter; these are the ring
torus[m] structures of the nested polar vortex
pair.
The
UVS research predicates the jet streams on Jupiter are manifested by the
vortrices of the nested polar vortex pair of Jupiter.
See
the UVS topic on "Jet
streams" that elaborates on how all the jet streams on Earth
are manifested by its nested polar vortex pair.
With
the underlying vortical structure and mechanism of jet stream elucidated,
the empirical observations of jet streams on Jupiter substantiate as the
qualitative proofs that these jet streams are the ring torus
structures of its nested polar vortex pair.
Note:
Jet streams on Jupiter, Saturn, Uranus, and Neptune, are also major unsolved
problems in planetary
science.
Watch
a video clip on "Perpetual
Ocean" that illustrates amazing satellite views for vortices
manifested in the oceans of the Earth.
.
The
satellite vortices of Jupiter
Based
on the UVS
model, the ovals and storms on Jupiter[w]
are satellite vortices , which are impelled by the nested polar
vortex pair of Jupiter to intrinsically resonate in its nested atmosphere.
The
UVS research predicates the ovals and storms on Jupiter are coalesced
by satellite vortices manifested and impelled by the nested polar
vortex pair of Jupiter.
From
the UVS perspective, the cyclonic satellite vortex is impelled by
the westerly jet stream manifested by a segment of the nested polar
vortex with its prograde motion, and the anti-cyclonic satellite
vortex is impelled by the easterly jet stream manifested by a segment
of the nested polar vortex pair with its retrograde motion.
And
it is simply a fact that these vortices as observed on Jupiter,
are the satellite vortices of the Jupiter's nested polar vortex
pair. This observation is a qualitative proof for
the ovals and storms are intrinsically resonated satellite vortices,
and they are impelled by the jet streams manifested by the nested
polar vortex pair of Jupiter. |
Interior
image of Jupiter's south pole,
captured by the NASA's Juno probe. [s] |
See
an externally linked reports on "Mysteries
at Jupiter: NASA's Juno Probe Reveals Cyclones, Auroras & Surprises",
and "Scientists
Baffled by Perfectly Geometric ‘Polygons’ of Cyclones on Jupiter".
Polygons’ of Cyclones on Jupiter [s]
|
|

An
illustration of the unisonal vortex paradigm with nested vortex
formations of cyclones and anti-cyclones. |
|
From
the UVS perspective, the polygons of cyclones on Jupiter as observed by
the NASA's spacecraft Juno, are satellite vortices that are being formed
with differential vortical motion in a nested unisonal vortex; these polygons
of cyclones are vortically resonated to form around the dominating vortex
in a nested manner.
“If
it looks like a duck, swims like a duck, and quacks like a duck, then
it probably is a duck.”
-
Duck
test
.
The
polar aurorae of Jupiter
Based
on unisonal
vortex mechanism[uvs], the phenomenon of the
polar aurorae on Jupiter is rendered by an intensified plasmatic polar
vortex.
From
the UVS perspective, the pair of polar aurorae on Jupiter are vortically
impelled by its nested polar vortex pair to ionically glow.
The
illumination of an polar aurora is caused by electric current generated
by the dynamo
effect[m] in magnetohydrodynamics[w]
of its vortically formed plasma, which causes ionized matters to glow
by electric
glow discharge[w] in the gaseous atmosphere.
Aurora
on Jupiter. [s] |
A
false color image of Jupiter's polar aurora. [s] |
Polar
aurorae on Jupiter (false color images). [s] |
Heuristically,
Jupiter and Sun have striking similarities in many aspects for their vortical
nature, and thus they are very comparable in the UVS worldview.
The
observed polar aurora on Jupiter suggests Jupiter could be perceived as
a failed star; it merely did not have the sufficient vortically induced
dynamo effect and required properties for igniting its plasma glow enitrely
to lit up like the Sun.
And
if Jupiter somehow manages to lit up to glow like the Sun with its dynamo
effect, the satellite vortices formed on the jet streams of Jupiter could
manifest as the sunspots[uvs]
of Jupiter.
See
the UVS subtopic on "Polar
aurorae of gas giants" that elaborates on how polar aurorae are
induced and demarcated by their underlying plasmatic polar vortex pair.
.
The
Great Red Spot on Jupiter
From
the UVS perspective,
the Great Red Spot on Jupiter[w]
is an anticyclonic storm resonated in its anti-cyclonic satellite
free vortex, which is impelled by a retrograde jet stream of a nested
polar vortex in a nested atmospheric layer of Jupiter.
As
a result of being impelled by a westerly jet stream, the Great
Red Spot[w] spinning in
counter-clockwise direction, is an
anti-cyclone that forms on the South Equatorial Belt in the southern
hemisphere.
As
empirically observed, the Great Red Spot is fixated with the sidereal
rotation of Jupiter. This suggests that it is a persistent atmospheric
eddy[w]
of a fixed emergent structure underneath the cloud band, impelled
by the retrograde jet stream of its anti-cyclonic satellite free
vortex.
The
UVS research predicates the Great Red Spot is a persistent atmospheric
eddy of its anti-cyclonic satellite vortex.
Revamped. |
The
Great Red Spot on Jupiter. [s] |
See
the UVS topic on "Bermuda
Triangle" that illustrates on how the dragging effect of landmass
could cause an atmospheric eddy to form in the nested atmosphere of the
Earth.
See
an externally linked report on "ROTATION
PERIOD OF GREAT RED SPOT" that shows the Great Red Spot had revolved
with the rotation of Jupiter with only a slight fluctuation.
An
earlier analysis for the causality of the Great Red Spot that was
falsified with insufficient evidence:
From the UVS perspective, the
stability of the Great Red Spot is primarily rendered by orbital
resonance with three Galilean
moons[w]
in Laplace
resonance[w];
it is manifested by the composite torque-induced precession of its
prominent moons that are in orbital
resonance.
*falsified
The
UVS research predicates the Great Red Spot of Jupiter is primarily
impelled by the three Galilean moons in Laplace resonance.
*falsified.
The empirical observation as recorded in "ROTATION
PERIOD OF GREAT RED SPOT"[m]
on
page 80 had shown that the Great Red Spot is fixated with the sidereal
rotation of Jupiter. (E&OE: The hypothesis was falsified with
the assumption that this empirical observation on the rotation period
of Great Red Spot is correct.)
Note:
In the event if the rotation period of Great Red Spot is later found
out to be in fact rotating in any form of Laplace resonance, this
predication of UVS research could be deemed as generally vindicated.
[Evidently,
from a perspective on fixed reference frame at the center
of Jupiter, such that the Great Red Spot is viewed to be isolated
and has an orbital period of slightly more than 9.925 hour
(the sidereal rotation period of Jupiter).
This is as a result of the Great Red Soot is revolving with
a slight westward drift, which is caused by the easterly jet
stream that retrogrades in the South Equatorial Belt on Jupiter.
Therefore,
Ganymede (at orbital period of 171.7
hr), Europa (85.2 hr), Io (42.5
hr) and the Great Red Spot (assuming
its relative orbital period is 10.6 hr) would be in
a 16:8:4:1 ratio of orbital period of their
orbital resonance, or has the orbital ratio of 1:2:4:16 in
their Laplace resonance.
From
the UVS perspective, the torque-induced
precession[w]
from the three Galilean moons in Laplace resonance with cyclonic
motion, impels the anti-cyclonic Great Red Spot with a differential
rotation by their exchanging of angular momentum.
The
precession effect of the three Galilean moons in a cyclonic
motion Laplace resonance, could have maintained the stability
of the Great Red Spot as an anti-cyclonic vortex.]
*falsified |
The Laplace resonance exhibited
by three of the Galilean moons. The ratios in the
figure are of orbital periods.
[The
orbital period of Great Red Spot was assumed to be
10.6 hours. And this is a perspective from above the
South Pole.]
*falsified
|
|
There
was no empirical evidence as yet that the Great Red Spot revolves
on Jupiter internally at the orbital period of 10.6 hour, however,
this is a very reasonable proposal by considering its slight westward
drift (can
be empirically observed) caused by the easterly jet stream that
retrogrades on the South Equatorial Belt, which would have slightly
increased its orbital period of the Great Red Spot, and could have
increased it from 9.925 hours to 10.6 hours.
(*falsified:
There is empirical evidence available on the Great Red Spot did
not revolve at the orbital period of 10.6 hour.)
Paradoxically,
this resolution for resolving the mystery was accomplished by analyzing
the Laplace resonance of Great Red Spot and the three Galilean Moons
in an inside-out manner perceived with the ratio of orbital
period; analyzing in the outside-in manner perceived with
the ratio of number of orbits negates its resolution from being
discovered in plain sight. And the underlying mechanism that supposedly
impels the Great Red Spot has come from outside of Jupiter, it supposedly
comes from the torque-induced precession of the three Galilean moons
in orbital resonance; the causality is seemingly not from within
Jupiter that renders the stability of the Great Red Spot.
*falsified
|
With
credit to oldbrew from TALLBLOKE'S TALKSHOP for his post that links to
an archive on "ROTATION
PERIOD OF GREAT RED SPOT", which has a 135 year record for the
sidereal revolving period of the Great Red Spot, and it shows that the
Great Red Spot had revolved with the rotation of Jupiter with only a slight
fluctuation.
Glossary:
altitude |
- |
The height of a thing above a reference level, especially above sea
level or above the earth's surface. |
cyclonic |
- |
Describing
a direction of rotation that is counterclockwise in the Northern Hemisphere,
clockwise in the Southern Hemisphere. |
cognitive
paradox |
- |
A
category of paradox
with illusions that involve perception or awareness, such as relative
motion illusion, optical illusion, tactile illusion (aka touch illusion)
and the likes. |
differential
rotation |
- |
Different
parts of a rotating fluid object move with different angular velocities. |
easterly |
- |
A
storm or wind coming from the east, toward the west; westwardly. |
latitude |
- |
The
measurement, in degrees, of a place's distance north or south of the
equator. |
viscous |
- |
Having
the property of viscosity; sticky. |
vortical
singularity |
- |
A
four-dimensional spheroidal culmination of aether with vortical motion
that unisonally spawns its resonated nested vortical fractals in its
vortical paradigm. |
westerly |
- |
A
storm or wind coming from the west, toward the east; eastwardly. |
Image
and animation credits:
Image
of planetary rings of Jupiter - Selden's gallery of Celestia pictures
Idealized
illustration of Jupiter's cloud bands
- Uploaded by User:Erimus; Public Domain
Enhanced
interior image of the Jupiter's south pole - NASA/JPL-Caltech/SwRI/MSSS/Betsy
Asher Hall/Gervasio Robles SCOTT BOLTON - 3
Image
of aurora on Jupiter as viewed by Hubble - By NASA, ESA, and J. Nichols
(University of Leicester)
Image
of polygons’ of Cyclones on Jupiter
- By NASA; NASA’s Juno mission
A
false color image of Jupiter's polar aurora - NASA/ESA, John T. Clarke
(University of Michigan)
Image
of aurorae on Jupiter (false color) - From AURA/STScI/NASA/JPL
Images
and animations of Jupiter - From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
A
sketch of unisonal vortex - Vincent Wee-Foo
Animation
of cloud band of Jupiter - Animation by Vincent Wee-Foo created with
an image of Jupiter from NASA
Galilean
moon Laplace resonance animation - By Matma Rex, illustration transformed
by Vincent Wee-Foo
The
classified denotations with URL links for the individual words and specific
phrases denoted in the UVS treatise:
[uvs] |
- |
A
specific UVS topic or a source from the UVS treatise. |
[g] |
- |
The
definition for the word in the glossary list of the UVS treatise. |
[d] |
- |
The
general definitions for the word from an the Internet dictionary source. |
[w]
|
- |
A
specific topic of the free encyclopedia by Wikipedia. |
[m] |
- |
A
miscellaneous Internet source. |
[s] |
- |
The
Internet source for the inserted image or animation. |
The
inception of this UVS topic was on 27th July 2007 with ongoing updates
since.
This counter was reset on 27/09/2022
Disclaimers:
The treatise of Universal Vortical Singularity (UVS) in its epistemological
paradigm shift, is fundamentally unconventional. Its hypotheses grounded
on a generally unheard-of UVS model, bound to have shortcomings, such
as loose ends, errors, and omissions errors. Many details and assumptions
in its propositions have yet to be further researched, probed, evaluated,
validated, or verified. Its implicit explanations are for casual understanding
of the UVS topics presented in the UVS worldview, so if any term or statement
is offensive in any manner from whatsoever perspectives, is most regretted.
Links to other sites do not imply endorsement of their contents; apply
appropriate discretion whenever necessary. Also, the content of the UVS
topics, from time to time could be arbitrarily modified without any notice.
Viewing
tips: Despite the presentations of the UVS web pages has went through
much accommodation for their viewings on smart phones, they are still
not entirely friendly to these mobile devices. For the best experiences,
use a MS Windows based PC or computer system with Java enabled browser
for running its interactive applets.
(Such as Java
Applet of Moiré pattern,
JPL
Small-Body Database Browser, and
Planet
Finder.)
Copyright
information: This UVS web site is for non-profit purposes and not for
commercial use. Wherever possible, direct credits to the origins of the
works or images were provided, be it on
fair
dealings, with explicit permission from
their owners, or the materials were believed to be from the public
domain. |